The Latent Weight - Result of a Spin of a Massive Body and a Source of Superfluous Energy by Jacob Bitsadze

Jacob

So as I understand it, the central idea is that the equations for rotary and linear motion have different forms. Hence constant speed of rotation results in centrifugal forces, whereas constant linear speed is not associated with forces.

The centripetal acceleration of a rotating body is not used in determining the kinetic energy, because this acceleration is perpendicular to the instantaneous rotary motion, i.e. for a rigid body there is no motion in the centripetal (radial) direction, only in the tangential. Also, you implicitly note that the tangential speed of a rotating body is highest at its outer surface and zero at the centre. Thus not all the mass in a rotating body is as effective at storing energy as in the linear case.

I'm not sure I understood you correctly, but you seem to infer that these differences are exploited in perpetual motion machines. Your proposed experiment does not seem to be a perpetual motion machine, but rather an apparatus to check whether there is a different angle of inclination (your 'corner of a deviation'?) for hanging weights that are orbiting, as opposed to hanging spinning orbiting weights. Have you done the test and what did you find?

You touch on a deeper question: Why it is that a body with linear speed will sustain that motion indefinitely (in the absence of any resistance)? And likewise a rotating body will sustain its angular velocity. I suspect there is a deep philosophical question in there. What really is mass?

Thank you

Dirk

Dear Dirk

I am very grateful to you for attention and an estimation.

You have understood the theory basically correctly.

The philosophy of weight is not clear even to great physicists.

As speak, The Higgs-Field resists to other elementary fields and thus create inert weight. But this resistance is not rigid but dynamical. Therefore the body has inertia.

But the weight creates the gravitation. Means, at interaction of Higgs-Boson with others bosons it should be created the graviton. Or graviton should exist independently itself and to create the weight as a result of an attraction...

Gravitational and Inert weights are equal precisely -it is proved experimentally.

Means Higgs -boson is itself a graviton.

Otherwise the weight of an attraction should differ from inert weight.

...

It is difficult for me to understand this confusion....

But let's compare already facts in evidence and formulas...

At linear movement the body has only weight (m)

At rotary movement the weight becomes the moment of inertia. That is the weight of a body is multiplied on a square of his radius.

If we shall consider philosophically, is it correctly to multiply weight on his parameter?

At rectilinear movement, the weight of a body is not multiplied on his length, width or volume...

You speak that kinetic energy of a flywheel is less, as linear speeds in the center of rotation has less. But kinetic energy is result of a impulse. The total moment of a pulse of rotating body is equal to zero. Means, the flywheel should not have inertia and kinetic energy... But it has inertia...

So it is necessary to take into account centrifugal acceleration instead of a moment of impulse in dynamics of a rotating body.

I did not carry out experiments. I work on underpaid work and I do not have superfluous financial assets. But in 2001 Tariel Kapanadze has appropriated one of variants of my mechanical generator and has lead successful experiment.

But experiment of Chas Chambell is more known. You can look them on a you-tube if you will type in search: Mechanical Generator Kapanadze or the generator of Chas Chambell

Gratefully

JacobAttachment #1: To_Dirk.doc

Hello Steve

Exellent. Let's cooperate. If there is equation of Bose-Einstein, why there should not be formula of Byzer- Dufourny?

But your equations do not correspond to a principle of equivalence of weight and energy. You do not take into account the relativistic factor.

Rememeber please the equations of relativistic gravitation and weights.

Best RegardsAttachment #1: To_Steve.doc

Jacob,be transparent.My equations are logic and rational. If you do not understand them, so don't insist with this equivalence proinciple.If you have studied sciences, me also.Not need of course about what is a rotation and a motion like a mass or a light or an energy.if you do not see the generality of my works, so don't insist. I have studied my foundamentals ok !!!

Now prove in live where there is a problem with my general theory and works.In fact I beleive that you are still one of these copycats.

In fact don't copy a thing totally unknwon for youi and don't insist about things totally unknown also. Learn your foundamentals please, after we shall speak perhaps more rationally.

ps I play like you play with me......

ps 2 an Byzer duduf equation yes ....

ps3 the factor of relativity, yes of course you are going to explain what is the GR relativity where the mass curves space and the SR where c is constant and max.

I have taken into account this relativity, that's why for your information that the universal spheres does not turn and that our central quantum spheres turn at a kind of maximum.The energy , the mass and the light are explained in its pure generality.So what is the probelm, you test my sciences, not need of that. I know where I go, how I go and why I go.

If you are still one of these pseudo copycats wanting several funds and recognizings.if you are still one of these strategists, ...so let me ex^plain you that It is not important for me these comportements. It shows simply their lack of knowledges and competences.There are simply not generalits respecting the real searchers, general furthermore.

In fact these kinds of persons are frutrated and their team are pseudo teams of business and marketing, that is all. Why they try so ? because it is the human nature and its stupidities. Because they like the opulences and the monney, the stupidities.....you think that these kinds of persons utilize their monney for the creation of jobs or for a harmonization of global systems.No they prefer the sad road of unconsciousness.And what I must say amen to them, it is that. Yes of course.and what afetr a nobel prize for these pseudos.You do not imrpove pseudo teams, you steal simply. Return at school aznd learn from my sciences, all the days I give a course in live, it is well no?

Regards and SPHERICALLY YOURS of course with humility

the Universal sphere without s , it does not turn so it is the maximum mass !!!! The volumes are not the probelm.So don't insist about the steps of E.and stabilities.

still one thing EUREKA ....tell it to your friends .

Steve,

I do not understand, what I have stolen from your theory..

I have not understood in general, what is such O cubed. S - means the area as I know. I have thought, that you have simply joked of my formulas, as have written a zero cubed.

I study physics myself and I do not know complex features. I anywhere did not meet variable O and the more so cubed.

Can you will tell where it is possible to read your theory. Maybe I can understand it!?

Steve.

I could not find your theory.. There are only comments.

Do you have the web-site where there is a theory and the information about your inventions?

From one sight your formula causes doubts. It is too much cubes, too much speeds.

Thus speeds are designated not by such symbols.

What do you name spin speed? - angular speed?

It seems to me that you have stolen my theory. :)))) -- You have taken my formula P = mV3 (cubed) then multiplied it for other speeds -- orbital speed cubed and spinal speed too cubed. :)))

Good Luck

On mine, if the weight is defined with Higgs-field, then a graviton it is not necessary. It is possible to explain gravitation with variety of Higgs-Boson. As assert, Higgs-Boson can accept any charge as plus so a minus. It can be absolute without a charge depending on circumstances.

Thus Higgs-field can provide both an attraction and inertia simultaneously. The curvature of space of time is only different density of a Higgs-field.

I know English not so well Steve. Therefore I do not understand nonliterary English in perfection. Excuse if I shall understand something incorrectly.

I cannot spy in your computer. I do not understand such questions.

Bitsadze -- it is the real Georgian surname. On English it is translated as the dissolute man. Likely my ancestors very much loved wine and women.:)))

Many think, that it is a pseudonym that is means sad and bit. Therefore for English-speakingers I subscribe Bizer or Byzer. It is the name of an ancient Georgian tribe which was well-known for the metallurgy. As speak in legends, they have started to do the first steel and nonferrous metals.

But in official documents and competitions I am obliged to write my surname like in the passport.

I earlier very well knew higher mathematics. So good, that I deduced new formulas sometimes at examinations.

Also I very well knew German and normally spoke on English. But because of illness of a brain I have forgotten all complex things..

But I can understand well philosophy of the physical phenomena. I have understood your logic, that any movement has the energy. The planet goes in 3 directions - tangential, orbital, and besides hi has centrifugal acceleration. All these speeds and acceleration should be summarized.

But how and in what proportions -- is there is a question.

Regards

No , I am not mad, I am right, I dislike the bad strategies of discriminations,

I pray for these poor souls.Mr Basudeba Mishra, well said about the meditations, but you know we loose our contemplations, how can be an universal mind in this global society.

You know, I will work with the first concrete proposition. BRICS or OTAN ....

Ps you know Europe is not very well.If you knew the psychological states of my region. The corruptions still and always.I f you knew how I have suffered due to bad people.But I continue even with people against me.I think that it is due to the hate, the unconsciousness, the stupidity, the bad, the vanity. In fact it is always the same probelm, the hormons and its meanders of irony. A real universalist never will fall down on the entropical arrow of times. The asians have a lot to give to this planet.I like their philosophy.India and China can save this world with USA .But are they ok to harmonize together this planet. The real secret is this respect in the high spheres. The rest seems vain after all. These high spheres can change this planet really and rationaly.

Mr Basudeba Mishra, take your responsabilities.And we shall sort the good and bad people :)siddartha Gottam Buddah sees in a fly of a bee, the hopes of a flower above the sufferings of human babies.

We loose our contemplations !!!

I don't fear to die Jacob, and I will continue, their only one solution is to kill me.

I don't fear you know. Even after my death, I will continue.These persons shall pay for all their sufferings implied by their stupidities.

They can laugh, they can discriminate, they can make what they want in fact.they can be masochists, or this or that.I will continue, alive or dead.

They can say lies .....

The corruption and the sadism are erros. You know, they can also say lies about my works. They can also saying the ridicule. It is me who will laugh on the entropical arrow of times.

You know Jacob, it exists real thinkers, and it exists the pseudos, these frustrated, the sadists, the masochists.....they are already finished.

The politic is not the probelm, the stupid persons yes. The corrupted bureaucracy is everywhere.But don't forgett hat it exists good persons everywhere.They shall save this planet. They shall harmonize this planet.

An universal person of faith never looses ! With or without the approvements of these pseudo humans. They are just poor souls, poor minds, poor spirits.

The stealers are like the liers, future looser simply.Let's pray for their poor soul.They are in fact lost in the meandersd of this society.They are just bad educated !!! They have just suffer and they have not ubndersttod the real universal message.And what? The pseudos , the masochists, the sadists, them are just already finished.They can travel in private airplane, they can buy all what they want you know.That will not change their redemption you know.

I am going to go in USA soon, I will utilize the media, and I will show to the world what is my theory.If they think that they can with their pseudo maths, let me laugh .I know better the maths than them.What they do not know is that maths are one of my passions.I classed the numbers at the age of 9 or 10, they are really bad fallen you know in all humility.In fact they have thought that my sciences were limited, now they see that it is them the limiteds. They can try with the criminal bureacrcy, but even like that, they shall loose !

Spherically yours and eureka from belgium, the real one!

I invite the pseudo to make surf in extradimensions ahahah

ps2 I know a very interesting person in sweden,; the dr naima Benali, she knows my theory and my project,if you knew the number of persons knowing my theory everywhere on this planet.The revolution is already begun.

REVOLUTION SPHERIZATION

I wish you success!

But it is better to create a website and put there all the math. Otherwise no one would believe only one formula. In addition, the formula should be written according to international rules. Otherwise, the all will think that your orbital velocity - O - is zero.

Solitude is the lot of geniuses. for a society to believe you, you need to make the explicit experiment. In my opinion to verify your proposed formula fits my machine ...

If you can build them with your friends, it will be very good. Other technical solutions can be found on my website:

http://technogeo.ucoz.com/load

I prefer here Mr Jacob,

Indeed you are right. It is well said. I will go soon in USA.I will see how are the relevances of the Institute of Advanced Studies. I d like speak with Mr Witten and Mr Guth and their friends. I am persuaded that we can make interesting convergences.

ps you know the socialism is not really a good thing when I see the pseychological states of people here in my region.In fact it is a balnce which is important between the creations of jobs and the social security. Of course my country has the best social protection, but be sure that it is not a solution.Be sure that it is bizare the effects on psychologics.The salaries are very weak here and the prizes very high.

In fact don't imagine that belgium is cool, be sure itis not so cool. We are 380/km² and all is already created and if you knew the responsabilities of these socialists and how they act ???? It is not really well you know. I have suffer a lot here due to this system Jacob. You think that it is easy to create an enterprize here.In fact the corrupted take all the funds or the socialist governments. It is bizare this bad governance.I am disgusted by my country.I love it but I am disgusted.

Thanks

Regards

There is one Georgian saying. To translate it precisely - it is impossible, but the sense is approximately such: "be happy as far as possible - according to circumstances. "

Diogen lived in a barrel but was quite happy. You likely know, what he has asked at Alexander the Great.

To work in research institute in the USA and to receive the Nobel Prize is certainly very perfectly.

But it is not necessary to be killed - if it will fail.

I have not understood in what context you speak about murder. If you will stay home somebody will kill you?

I do not think that someone wants to kill you. But in any case, to live under fear is not the best decision. The fear does not solve any problem.

True man should be always ready to war and death! :)

If somebody wants to kill you spit on them. They are dung. The worthy person never will want to kill you. And stupid dung never will understand that by means of murder it is impossible to destroy the person. The chemical body is one of your substances. If you will lose a chemical substance others will stay to live. Some from them will live eternally.

Except for that not-chemical bodies can revenge very easily. It is one of advantages of death.

But simply to die - is silly. Learn KaRaTe, buy the weapon and defend.:)))

Hunger doesn't say "Stale bread" and cold doesn't say "Old coat" (Georgian saying)

A word and a stone let go can not be called back. (English saying). Take care.

Dear Jabob Bitsadze,

I have taken a look at your essay. I think you begin with some interesting questions. There is a problem in cosmology, which is there seems insufficient mass in galaxies for gravity to hold them together. For which dark matter has been suggested as a solution. So finding some extra unaccounted for mass would be helpful.(I don't think gravity is due to curvature of space-time merely due to the presence of a mass but the disturbance of the environment of space when massive bodies progress along their universal journey. For a planet that journey can includes rotations as well as orbits and progressions with star system and galaxy. I think inertial mass is due to an -alteration- of the default motion).So the deficiency of mass may be due to not taking into account the universal motion of the objects, (the extra inertia). I don't know how exactly cosmologists calculate the mass of galaxies.

There is a difference between rest mass and mass of a moving object. The faster it is moving the harder to alter its course, it appears heavier (due to the resistance of the environment to the change in my opinion) but the rest mass stays the same, the amount of object itself is not altered. IMHO the seeming increase in mass is not a property just of the object but the object environment relationship. I know a spinning gyroscope is harder to move than a non spinning one. There is a continued steady alteration from the default course when an object is spinning at constant speed so the (one off )resistance of the environment is added ( but in this scenario too the amount of object itself is not altered). I don't think it will -continue to gain mass- just because it is spinning, as this new relationship is steady and not changing. (Unless the deposition of material onto the surface due to gravitational attraction is considered).

I don't know if you will consider any of those musings, which fit with my own explanatory model rather than mainstream physics, relevant or will think that I am missing the point of your essay, I may be. I am not a qualified physicist and not best qualified to comment on your mathematics, so I skimmed over it- and it was a large part of the essay. I may have missed out on a lot of helpful explanation. Your essay is unusual in that most other essays do not suggest an experiment. The experiment does not look too difficult to set up and perform. Have you tried it and got any interesting results? It ends abruptly.

I hope you get more interest in your essay and helpful feedback. Good luck.

Dear Georgina

I am very grateful to you for attention. Unfortunately I have no financial assets for carrying out of the described experiment. As the vacuum chamber is necessary for this device to exclude influence of Magnus-force . Official physics refuse to carry out this experiment. They name my formulas incorrect. But they cannot prove the criticism neither theoretically nor practically.

But I prove my correctness with VERY SIMPLE COMPARISON: At linear movement the body has only weight - m . But at rotation the weight is multiplied on a square of his radius -mR(2). And other dimensions have no value. If the flywheel will have length of 5 kilometers, its weight is multiplied only on a square of his radius.

If it is correct, so the weight of linearly moving body should be multiplied on his length, width or volume.

So itself rotary movement is incorrect, instead of my formulas... On the contrary, my equations take into account this incorrectness.

The equations are displayed here incorrectly. You can look the CORRECT EQUATIONS in the attached file.

As this theory is confirmed with experiments.

For example Тariel Кapanadze has changed an arrangement of pulleys in my generator and has lead the successful experiment. In his variant the effect of the lever is directed against centrifugal acceleration, but the generator works.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90W00Yt_PLk&feature=player_embedded

Generator of Chas Chembell has the same inefficient proportions and besides many superfluous details, but works.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QD2Whs_LxA&feature=player_embedded

And in my variants the effect of the lever promotes centrifugal acceleration, but I have no money to their construction.

As to the theory. The increase of weight is a conditional term. According to the Theory of the Relativity the Weight and Energy are equivalent. Even more - the weight is one of forms of energy. Therefore the weight increases at movement.

E=mc2 either means E=m0c2 for an object at rest, or E=mrelc2 when the object is moving.

Thus exists two kinds of the "increased" weight mrel :

longitudinal --

and cross-section --

Where -- the relativistic factor.

The increase in weight depends on a direction of the force enclosed to it.

.

If force is directed perpendicularly to movement -- . ..

And if in parallel --

In a rotating body force should be directed in parallel to his linear speed. Otherwise force will brake rotation.

In my formulas of rotation linear speed is cubed just as in the theory of a relativity the relativistic factor ascends in a cube.:))) ... And it is quite correct, because centrifugal acceleration is very real factor.

The kinetic weight is taken into account in gravitation too:

Under this formula gravitation depends not only on inert weight of rest, but also from speed and a direction of movement of this weight.

So it is possible to take into account also weight of rotation which should exist because of centrifugal acceleration.

The main theme of my article consists that, if the weight is equivalent always and everywhere then centrifugal acceleration should be equivalent to usual acceleration. But centrifugal acceleration is not taken into account in equivalent formulas.

For example the formula of Newton F=ma for a rotating body is M=Iε . Where I - the moment of inertia, and ε - only angular acceleration. During stable rotation this formula is not meaningful, as angular acceleration is equal to zero. Hence force becomes equal to zero too. But this is absurdity.... In that case the body should not rotate. But it rotates - because there is a centrifugal acceleration.

Therefore I suggest that in this formula together with angular acceleration to write down centrifugal acceleration.

Also it is necessary to take into account the centrifugal acceleration in the formula of kinetic energy of a flywheel.

As centrifugal acceleration can be considered as a special case of the relativistic spin .

ﾧ  - Tensor of a full pulse of system.

ﾧ

ﾧ  - total 4-speed of system

ﾧ  - Tensor of Levi-Civita.

Because of dissymmetricity of Levi-Civitas tensor, the 4-vector of a spin is always perpendicular to 4-speed Precisely so the vectors of centrifugal acceleration and linear speed of a flywheel are perpendicular.

In such system of the readout , in which the total pulse of system is equal to zero (i.e. during rotary movement about the axis), spatial components of the spin coincide with a vector of the moment of a pulse, and a component of time is equal to zero.

Component of time it is equal to zero in my formula

m V3 / R..

Thus a spatial component of the spin "recovers" a "dead" pulse and erects linear speed in a cubic degree.

At linear movement, a component of time t is kept, but the spin do not exist at all.

m V2 / 2t

BEST REGARDSAttachment #1: To_Georgina.doc

very well, Steve.

I like a poem Mayakovsky.

my amateur translation is:

in this life is not hard to die.

live in the world is much more difficult.

must first transform lives for the better.

after doing can sing a new life

so all success to you!