Galaxy Anatomy: \"Darwin Spirals\" by Hope He and Jin He

Dear Hope and Jin,

I really enyoyed your essay. Well done on such a nice piece of work. It's the best one I've read so far. I liked the Darwin Spiral idea and also firmly believe in the necessity to understand these golden galaxy spirals. I *do* have an alternative solution for the conundrum, which is waiting to be approved and posted, fingers crossed. You should both be interested with luck. Cheers

Hi,

Your essay is interesting and enjoyable to read. But please explain how your essay addresses the theme of this competition: which of our basic physical assumptions are wrong? That was not made clear to me. Thank you.

jcns

Thanks!

Hi again, I've been thinking about the barred spiral galaxy formation conundrum and have realised that my essay has a solution for you. It has been recently been approved and posted incidentally. I propose that there is non-spherical 'hidden exotic matter' (HEM) at the centre of the galaxies as well as at the centre of stars. The additional force on the plane of rotation of a galaxy or star would require a HEM shaped like a rugby ball ready to be kicked. This assumes that the exotic matter gravitation effect is dependent on it's cross sectional area. Hence a star on the rotational plane 'sees' more of the galactic centre HEM compared to a star high above or below the plane. If this galactic centre HEM is 'squashed' from the sides so that it becomes more lozenged shaped, then this also gives a greater x-sectional area in just a single bar, radiating out across the rotational plane. This model therefore predicts that the bar in a barred spiral is rotating at the same rate as the galactic centre HEM.

I'm keen to hear what you may have to think about these revolutionary ideas.

Why do you say "This whole universe is definitely not of 'relativity'."? Is there some evidence or argument that is contrary to relativity?

The essay is quite clear in my eyes. Dr Jin He works for a chinese company which models galaxy formation. He says that the spiral galaxies "are easy" but the barred spirals remain an enigma. I think that he intuitively believes that the 'standard model' has a fundamental problem, which is why Hope and Jin have entered the competition. A fact that is missing from the essay is that *at least* two thirds of spiral galaxies are barred spirals. This really means that modern science doesn't have the ability to model spiral galaxy formation, even with the existing dark matter halo hypothesis. I have given an alternative solution which has the ability to solve the barred spiral enigma as well as the ice age enigma.

Nevermind. Your essay entry has been very useful to me, so thank you for that. I've even remembered that Mercury's precession can be accounted for by it's close proximity to the sun's exotic centre and irregularities. It's rise and fall about the ecliptic must take it into a region where it 'sees' a change in the sun's HEM cross sectional area imo.

Anyway, thanks again.

Oops, I made a mistake. Mercury's precession is due to the innermost planet's higher frequency of exotic matter debris impacts from supernovae throughout the Milky Way over time. The extra tides due to high orbital inclination is likely the delineator between the inner rocky planets and the outer gas giants. This extra tidal energy is the likely originator of the Great Red Spot for Jupiter and so on for the others.

Oops..or should the x-sectional rugby ball be on it's side? The Earth experiences additional tides during the glacial period and *not* the interglacial which is slightly counterintuitive. More tides pushes warm water and air to the poles from the equator. This has the strange effect of cooling the planet due to the accumulative albedo effect of the permanent snow and ice.

Dear Hope and Jin

Barred spirals were indeed unexplained in any secular or classical evolutionary theory, and a major bizarre anomaly, until quite recently, the enigma resolved courtesy of the discrete field model (DFM).

http://vixra.org/pdf/1102.0016v3.pdf

I should of course say that although web archived at vixra and the RAS this is still not yet published in a mainstream journal as reviewers reject anything that may be conceived as different from the current ruling paradigm. In fact the DFM derives the observed effects of SR direct from a quantum mechanism, but it is none the less unfamiliar.

To explain; after AGN (disc) accretion and (quasar) jetting the re-ionized matter lies in a line, or splayed butterfly shape (from spiral jets) ave some 2,000 light years long (1M at M87).

Due to intrinsic rotation in space the central 'virial' radius starts to rotate (Google Hawk) propagating matter at the circumference and 'trailing the arms. Inside this the remains of the jet arms form the bar, which rotates bodily, or in 'lock step', just like all spirals. This is on a NEW perpendicular axis to the old galaxy, explaining They then evolve into a full spiral, merge into a disc, accrete into a lenticular as the AGN grows, and the cycle restarts. I recently posted to Singh's essay blog I think why the cycle seems to be around 10-12Gyr. There are good NASA shots of Centuarus A undergoing the rapid accretion and jetting process. (Previously thought o be a collision!)

There are many other anomalies explained by this.

Some papers with previous interpretations but good evidence here, the first of intrinsic rotation;

Parra, F.I., Barnes, M., Catto, P.J., RPCtr. Th.Phys. Ox. CCFE. N.Fusion. 2011. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.4613.pdf

Zoltan H. Jimenez R. Bernardire.M. Constructing the cosmic evolution of quasars from the age distribution of local early-type galaxieshttp://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astroph/pdf/0610/0610723v1.pdf

Wold,I. et al. Host galaxies of luminous quasars population synthesis of optical off-axis spectra.RAS Vol.408,Issue2,pp.713-730. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408..713W

Benton R, Metcalf, A. Constraints on Small-Scale Structures of Dark Matter from Flux Anomalies in Quasar Gravitational

Lenses http://arxiv/pdf/1007/1007.1599v1.pdf

DeBuhr, J., Quataert E., Ma, C.P., Galaxy-scale outflows driven by active galactic nuclei. MNRAS accepted. 30.10.2011

Martini ,P., Weinberg D.H.., Quasar Clustering and the Lifetime of Quasars 2001 ApJ 547 12 doi:10.1086/318331.

Porciani, C., Magliocchetti P., Norberg P., 2004 MNRAS 355 Issue 3, p1010-1030.

I do hope that is all enlightening. There is much more of course. Main paper now in review for 3rd time!

Best wishes

Please do also read my essay and comment. Thanks

Peter

hope he

See my essay http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413

Specially post about the Universe as a logarithmic spiral.

Dear Jin He,

Your cosmic breasts discovery is breathtaking. The FQXi community loves this kind of science. Your community rating is much greater than mine even now but I expect you to go to the top of the rating list.

Good luck, Pentcho Valev

Dear Pentcho Valev,

Thanks for your kind words.

In fact I learned about varying light speed etc on internet during 2007 when I found your posts and I sill remember your name.

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Dears Hope and Jin,

I enjoied in reading your interesting Essay.

I am going to give you a score 10.

Cheers,

Ch.

Dear Hope and Jin,

I think your essay is interesting, although I don't know much about galaxies. I hope you will find the recognition you deserve.

Best regards,

Cristi Stoica