James,
One of my mentors, a retired professor of electrical engineer, former editor of one of the IEEE journals, and active reviewer of IEEE article submissions up to three months preceding his death (Jan 2011), told me what had to happen first, and I quote, "To get recognition by engineers-physicists-mathematicians, your paper has to be referred to by a "Big Shot" in one of the papers he/she writes."
I have sent emails to individuals that I thought had significant influence in theoretical and mathematical physics, such as Lee Smolin, John Baez and others, hoping they would read my email and access the paper. This has not happened.
Garrett Lisi visited conferences where the significant players congregated and discussed his E8 theory with specific individuals, plus he could present his theory in the language that they understood.
Until one of the significant players learns that there is a mathematical method to define base units of measure, nothing will happen. I would have liked to have made the following statement in my paper:
"Every intelligent species in the universe, after identifying the methodology to define the base units of measure, created a set of scientific units of measure based upon the concepts in the methodology."
I knew I couldn't get such a statement through peer review.
Everyone assumes that SI units are an acceptable way to define a set of units. Even though the CCU recommends that all base units be defined in terms of physical constants, they know of no other way to define the core base units, a length and unit of time, that is, define the size of a length, and use the Earth second as the basis for the size of a "duration of time."