Good morning Peter,
Yesterday night, I replied thanking you for kind words and encouragement it gives me to devote time to PicoPhysics. May be I missed Submit button.
You are right; any model that assumes us at the centre of anything is retrograde. In PicoPhysics world, any model that thinks in terms of center of universe is retrograde itself. Galileo moved center from earth to near sun. The universe, he was concerned about, was sun and planets. In my childhood, I was taught this picture planets moving around sun as universe. In time of Galileo that itself was a big achievement. It made possible for Newton to conceptualize inertia and enunciate to us universe in a very different context (static, kinetics and dynamics) of inertia, force, energy as capacity to do work. We can only imagine his struggle & difficulty in accepting concept of inertia which goes against much of intuitive human learning. PicoPhysics face similar difficulty in accepting Konservation.
In Picophysics, center of the universe in a sense is the location of observer, except for this no center exists. From this center as origin, 3-D space extends in all six directions. Here we have a an unfulfilled requirement - integration of Pythagoras theorem.
3-D space is well integrated into PicoPhysics. But Euclidean Geometry still exists separate from PicoPhysics. Once we are able to integrate Pythagoras theorem into Unary law - 'Space contains Knergy' we would have covered one of the two remaining milestones.
The last milestone to cover is natural units of measure. We have plank's constant and speed of light as natural units of measure. We need a third natural unit of measure. The candidate at this time is electronic charge and Hubble's constant.
Electronic charge as natural unit of measure: Charge of electron, looks to be an ideal candidate as natural unit of measure. It exists in multiple units across whole range of particles and matter. It is not found to exist in parts (except some exceptions that will need to be addressed). However, when we look towards its usefulness it's mass - the electronic mass and radius appears to be equally significant. In this regard, hubble's constant is cleaner but intuitively much more difficult to grasp as a natural unit of measure. We have to choose between the two.
Thus PicoPhysics still requires some work to be completed, before being presented as an alternative to mainstream physics.
The objective of PicoPhysics is integration rather than prediction. However, it does have some predictions that are different from mainstream physics. One important among them is:
Inverse square law: In mainstream physics, presence of source of inverse square law fields such as charge, affects whole of 3-Dimensional space. In PicoPhysics based on infinite order analysis (infinite math - a component of PicoPhysics) does not allow that. This leads to prediction that the affect of charge can not be felt when it falls below a certain level. The same will apply for gravitation. Thus gravitation field also is contained in space as is all inverse square law fields.
The essay 5-D universe is conceived to have a judgement on acceptability of intuitively true statement 'space contains energy' as the fundamental law of nature. But we find the interpretations of E=MC2 as simultaneity equation (that we have used since 1965) is questionable. Mainstream physicist differentiates between mass and energy as exemplified by Higgs Boson as particle contributing to mass of universe.
We are encouraged by response that signifies some thinking minds were able to connect with the heading '5-Dimensional Universe'.
Thanks and Best Regards
Vijay Gupta