Ioannis
It was a great pleasure reading you essay. I find much equivalence and some commonality, but have one objection. The assumption of the instant 'Big Bang'. I agree with your 'Cosmological Age' principle, which perhaps can still work with a function allowing for a 'process' of accretion and 'jet' ejection (recycling) over non zero time. The AGN 'black hole' IS then the new universe, re-ionized. This may not however be central to what I believe is a genius essay and conception, if my interpretations are correct, in which case I believe it is worth a top score.
We may all describe the same thing or event differently, and physics is no exception. I have proposed a 'real' (c) as well as 'apparent' (c+v) light speed, with paralells to your RCS and VCS, and similarly pointed out the importance to distinguish between observer frames. Particularly I identify Cartesian co-ordinate systems and point particles as invalid for mapping motion.
I even replied to a post recently that the maximum age of the universe is indeed also still very much at large. Our thoughts have much in common, all the more valuable perhaps for the different aspects. I would like to see if you can find those connections with my own essay, which derives unification, CSL and curved space time direct from a quantum mechanism, even consistent with a 'real' interpretation of Copenhagen, also discussed elsewhere.
I crammed too much in, so the implications of the kinetic logic are easy to miss, but I think you will see them, and greatly look forward to your comments. Just look under 'Jackson'. Many thanks.
And please do revert re the big bang.
Best wishes
Peter Jackson
