Understanding the Structure of the Universe, A Basic Structural Toolkit by Paul N Butler

Paul Butler

Dear Ioannis,

It is good that you desire further communication. I am not sure how to get a face to face meeting. I don't get to Greece at this time. Do you get to the United States of America? That is where I do my work here at this time. Yes it is too bad man's language is so confounded. It makes things so difficult. If one team is much better than the other, wouldn't the ball always be moved by the better team toward the poorer team's part of the terrain instead of staying in the center of the terrain? Of course, I am not sure what game you are talking about, so I may be completely wrong on that. I think that most people have problems being understood at one time or another. The nature of the language structures and lack of a set common meaning basis is partly responsible. As an example, when a fifth vector transfer is made there is a standing wave sensor pattern that travels in front of the data that is to be transferred. It is called the time fly. If it is altered by interference, it sends information to the standing wave processing unit behind it about the pattern of the interference. The processor then alters the data, so that it will be restored to its original content by the interference as it passes through it. The processor then changes itself in a similar manner. After the interference has been passed, the processor restores the time fly to its original standing wave sensor pattern. Of course there can be several layers of such structure because you could be the data stream and would not likely want to be changed from the way you are. Time flies are like the wind that precedes the data stream and can be altered by other intersecting winds. I have heard that in some primitive civilizations that have heard something about it, but do not really understand it, they think of the time fly as a small flying insect that likes the wind. I have even heard that there is one particularly backward civilization that thinks that time itself flies like the wind when it is really just the wind that flies and as it does it generates a time period. That was a sci-fi joke that illustrates how the same word pattern can be looked at in different ways. Or was it?

May things go well for you,

Paul

Paul Butler

Dear Hector,

Teasing can add spice to life, especially if you can find someone else that knows how to participate in a way that is not negative and can open up thought possibilities that might not otherwise be seen or accepted. I usually try to pass on some valuable information for those who can comprehend it. There are many types of symmetries in the world and many symmetries within each of many of these types. What particular symmetries are you interested in breaking. Men like to break things apart and analyze the pieces. It can often be more useful to start with nothing and build things up instead. After all, that is how the world came into being in the first place. I see from my research that you are interested in mathematics and computer applications of it. You might like path flow structuring concepts. Of course, you also might want to take on the more ambitious task of generating the math to describe a matter particle's fourth and fifth vector standing wave interrelationships and the interaction relationships between matter particles. There are symmetries involved there. I try to not break them, however, as that could create very messy situations that are hard to clean up. Sadly there are some that like to make messes for their gain to man's detriment that must be stopped at the appropriate time, but full judgment time must be provided to them. I am sure that you can understand that if man was going from world to world destroying the local populations, so he could take over worlds for himself, you would not want to see man destroyed without first being given the opportunity to change his ways. The Fifth Vector Structural Council does not take the destruction of an entire life structure lightly. Such things will be stopped one way or the other at the proper time, however. There is a Sci-Fi moment for you; at least it looks like one.

Mysteriously,

Paul

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

Paul Butler

Dear Sergey;

It is good that you desire for the contest to be fair. My purpose for entering it is not to win the prize, as I suppose is the goal of most who enter it, however (although it could have value if it brought attention to or encouraged acceptance of the concepts given). My purpose is to transfer information to man, so that in the future, man can continue to exist and to have life of abundance. Man's ability to perceive and understand the information provided and to fill in the blanks that I have purposely left in its presentation and to use it to develop the necessary technology in the time that is available to do so are the variables of concern to me. No man can rig that contest, but the rewards of winning it can be great and many can win because there are many offshoots from the basic concepts and many of them will generate advancements worthy of a Nobel Prize. I have observed that some of the concepts that have been provided have been incorporated to some extent in some of the papers that have been submitted by others in this contest. This is a positive development. It seems that most have a hard time accepting that all things can be composed of motion, so a common thread in some papers is to imagine some medium through which motion travels as a part of space or existing in space. Motion, however, (by definition) travels through empty space with no need of a medium through which to travel. It should not be too difficult at this point in time to accept that motion composes all things because man has already come to understand that things that look solid and appear to be standing still are composed of molecules that are continually moving and they are made of atoms that also move and the atoms are made of sub-atomic particles that move around in the atoms. It should not be too hard to consider that the particles are composed of motions also. I know that it takes time to get used to new concepts even if they are extensions of current understandings, so I see such papers as a good beginning of acclimation.

Even if I was interested in winning the prize money, I could not win the main $10,000 prize because I do not have the local professional and/or academic credentials, so I would be limited to just the last $1000 prize possibility. This is a much greater inequity in the way that the contest is designed than the problem that you mention because even if someone submits a paper that provides new concepts that will completely change life in this world for the better for all, he could not win the main prize if he developed the concepts separately from professional or academic resources. A person with such abilities should be considered greater than those who require such resources to develop the concepts that they present, but instead he would be treated as a lower class person to be excluded or at best to be minimalized to the lowest level of reward for his labor. Maybe you could take up the cause and work to change this fault also. I don't really expect man to understand all the positive implications of the information that I am presenting for some time and by then I probably won't be here to receive any reward for it anyway. I guess they could give it to my children or their children depending on how long it takes them to figure it out. More likely others who first figure out the value of the concepts will get the credit and I am not against that because the benefit of them to the betterment of life for man is the real value (prize) of the concepts provided.

May you be successful in making the contest better for all,

Paul

« Previous Page