About the False Statements in Physics by V. Boikachov, I. Nikiphorov, A. Rysin, and O. Rysin

Andrei Rysin

Essay Abstract

There are the new approach to understanding of interrelation of the electromagnetic fields and gravitational fields which give a basis of our universe. It has been made on the basis of critic and the analysis of paradoxes in the field of nuclear physics, of quantum mechanics and of the theory of electromagnetic interaction. The development of physics without interrelation of the specified forces can go only on the basis of miracles and unreasonable the postulates, and it has led a physics how the science to the deadlock.The new theory have basis on relationships of cause and of effect and unites in itself all earlier known laws of physics and the quantum theory of a field. Authors managed to solve the problem of Einstein in association of electromagnetic and gravitational forces, but it has demanded reconsideration of many positions, both in the physicist, and in the mathematician and philosophy.It is clear the technique of calculation of the closed decisions in the theory about an electromagnetic origin of the so-called charged particles, as we has shown unequivocal communication of electromagnetic and gravitational forces. As we avoid all existing paradoxes and mistakes of the previous theories, it is possible to consider how the doubtless achievement of the new theory. Thus authors did not invent new kinds of the equations, and have shown logic of communication of already existing decisions in the physicist.

Author Bio

Rysin А.V.-radio engineer, has ended the Moscow institute of a radio engineering, electronics and automatics. The co-author of 5 copyright certificates, 3 scientific and technical clauses 3 of books. Bojkachyov V.N. the-candidate of engineering science, the senior scientific employee, has ended the Moscow aviation institute, 60 proceedings, 3 copyright certificates, 12 patents. Nikiforov I.K. the candidate of engineering science, the senior lecturer, has ended the Chuvash state university, 43 scientific works. Rysin O.V. the-radio engineer, has ended the Moscow institute of a radio engineering, electronics and automatics. The co-author of 3 copyright certificates, 3 books.

Download Essay PDF File

Jayakar Joseph

Dear Andrei Rysin,

I think the fallacy of existing physics begins with the atomic analogy we follow and the nature of particles we assume. Thus if we workout with a different paradigm of universe, there may be changes on our assumptions in the fundamental forces of nature, in that we may have to decline the weak and strong nuclear forces and may get interpreted differently. However, gravity and electromagnetism may be considered as same, but with different origin.

With best wishes,

Jayakar

Andrei Rysin

Dear Jayakar Johnson Joseph, I agree that weak and strong nuclear forces it is miracles as in interaction under known laws of physics they simply do not have a place, them it is simple not where to insert. Here therefore we also have gone on a way from simple to complex. Advantage of our theory is that we on the basis of Lorentz's transformations can explain a difference of masses between a proton and electron and a difference between electric and magnetic permeability. Other approach will not give interrelation.With best wishes, Rysin Andrey.

Ted Erikson

1st timer submission, not yet submitted, while reviewing selected works for End Notes.

Very interesting paper but got lost in the heavy math, but love your necessity of "opposites exist"!!

I see them as mass and energy, respectively, as the inscribed sphere, tangent to the face of a regular tetrahedron where sphere and tetrahedron surface-to-volume ratios are equal at ANY size, e.g. equivalent "activity" as free energy.

Comment? (may use in end notes)

Andrei Rysin

Dear Ted Erikson, we decide tasks which are following logic from knowing equations,as it find through experiences. This is alone path, which exclude mistakes.It is possible to speak through abstraction, but for practice it is not give result.

Steve Dufourny

Hello

I have several ideas for you.

1 the volumes

2 the number of the serie of uniquenss

3 forget the binar system :).It is better to insert the increase of density correlated with volumes.

4 insert the 2 other motions of light, so the spinal speed and the orbital speed, with c the linear speed , it is relevant for the principle of equivalence !

5 the fermions turn in opposite sense than bosons !

6 Dirac and Maxwell are in a bar, they speak about the Minkoswsi space time, do you think that they have seen the spherization ....quantum spheres....cosmological spheres....Universal sphere.

7 Eureka from Belgium !

Regards and good Good luck

Ted Erikson

Hmmm. Thank you. Will take your advice under consideration, but I have already ready to submit via an off-the-wall approach. I am suggesting experimental means for confirming logic. Even a preliminary definition of consciousness.

Steve Dufourny

You are welcome.

I totally agree, the experiments are the best friends of rational results.

I am happy to see the word sphere :)

In fact the secret is there, the spheres and their rotations.

Best Regards

Andrei Rysin

Dear Steve Dufourny. We gave text very short, but for full information you must read our books. Now we translate our book on english language, so you must wait, if you not know of russian language.

Steve Dufourny

Hello Andrey Rysin,

I wish you all the best.

Vladimir Rogozhin

Dear Andrew!

With great interest and attention to read your profound and wonderful essay. The main thing in it - new ideas. Thank FQXi that such a great event organized competition of global importance for basic science. We must all together to overcome the "trouble in Physics" ... Success in promoting your ideas! I am happy to put your essay a high rating for the new original idei.

Sincerely, Vladimir

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin