Thanks. I read Peters and cited many others here in mine. Shame so few seem to get read by so many. I beelieve th bondary mechnism, which I've read Peter characterise as a 'fluid dynamic coupling', is one of the biggest advances in physics for hundereds of yearsm, but here it site, on what is supposed to be a progressive foundational site, being virtually ignored.
I've read Peters last years essay too, and I think he must be either very frustrated or resigned at the lack of comprehension. There are many essays here dealing with esoterics, but this is the only big and verified breakthrough here, and where are we? Yours should certainly be far higher in the rankings. At least Peters essay is doing reasonably. Perhps it may be read by the right judge, who can droop assumptons. But I wonder.
Rich