The Persistent Failure of a Two Substance Paradigm by Peter CM Hahn

[deleted]

Benjamin,

Thanks for your input. Your essay is extremely interesting, however, beyond my mathematical understanding.

I agree with your point 1 "Physics is more than mathematics". A working physical model of reality is absolutely essential, but seriously lacking in QM and GR. I prefer using the bottom-up approach, which has allowed me to develop Foamy Ether Theory. This theory describes a single-substance paradigm and is based on an actual working physical model. (I'm confident that you will find it interesting.) Perhaps your "quantum circuits" could be applied in modeling foamy ether structure!

Cheers,

Peter

[deleted]

Benjamin,

Looks like my link to Foamy Ether Theory is broken.

Here it is:

http://www3.telus.net/foamyether/

Peter

Sergey Fedosin

After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

[deleted]

On my site I present new unified, final theory (ToE) of the Universe which proves that all physical phenomena - mass, electric charge, electric field, magnetic field, gravity and gravitational field - are consequences of changes in local pressure and density of the ether. Ether, which fills infinite space of the Universe, is enormously dense, and contains enormous energy. Theory calculates all experimentaly measured values on subatomic, atomic and cosmic level.

address is http://www.vasiona.rs/en/

Please contact me if you have any questions.

« Previous Page