Dear hoang cao hai:
For many years, I have grappled with this problem, and in any acceptable solution, there must be an application, a model, a prediction, a use, etc. I strongly feel that "growth" as opposed to "motion": is being ignored. Light velocity is a maximum for motion, i.e. ":energy".. An analogical maximum for growth might also be evident for mass...or maybe a minimum?
Your essay, in words identify the real problems of physics...and philosophy. You are correct to begin the study at ground zero, i.e. a "beginning". But, to logically assess any start, there must be evidence which obviously is impossible. (we weren't there).
So, it seems that the best one can do is assume the success of quantum theory, i.e. "probabilities" is promising. In my End Notes, I show a tentative and simple model that identifies probabilities as being related to "space dimensions", i.e. 0-D,1-D,2-D,and 3-D and recently discovered that a "frequency" correction causes extrapolations to 3... or 4-D!! Time is definitely involved with probability. Infinite time can cause anything to occur..
Perhaps those more intelligent and better mathematically inclined can make better sense of it, or destroy the approach. Either way.I would be pleased. I am getting too old to worry about it anymore.
To Seek Unknown Shores
聽聽 http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1409
