The Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, Based on a Massless but Energetic Oscillating (Non SM Higgs) Vacuum Particle System by Leo Vuyk

Leo Vuyk

Essay Abstract

This essay presents some features of a non Standard Model philosophy called the Quantum Function Follows Form model (Q-FFF). It is assumed that the different Functions in nature are based on Form differences of real particles with different internal and external structure and that the Higgs is the origin of all basic singular particles by its convertibility. Quarks are supposed to be compound particles with one, two or three electrons or positrons as a base merged with one or two real Gluons. In the Q-FFF model, mass is interpreted as the capacity of real shaped and spinning Fermions to produce gravitons, as the resulting (form) information products of collisions with an alternative (non-Standard Model) Higgs vacuum lattice system. Consequently the Higgs system itself can have no mass, it is supposed to be the transportation device for graviton- and other photonic information. Thus the Higgs mass found in the LHC at Geneva of 126 GeV, is interpreted as pure oscillatory energy of real "new Higgs" vacuum particles. The new Higgs particles are supposed to be convertible by an internal rotational structure they are responsible for the creation of "Something" out of "Nothing" and a counter balance for all forces in nature.

Author Bio

Leo Vuyk studied at the Technical University of Delft grade : Engineer (Ir, = Msc) in 1971 (architecture). Interests: Quantum- and Astro physics, Philosophy.

Download Essay PDF File

[deleted]

Not up to date. Does nature recognize fancy mathematics? My essay is perhaps overly simplified, but addresses the real problem of Physics. Wherein lies "consciousness"? Very murky, but emergentism (growth) and panpsychism (memory are properties suggested that aligns them with probabilities of a 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D geometric world.Activity of sphere and tetrahedron are identical in model proposed. See:

To Seek Unknown Shores

聽聽 http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1409

[deleted]

Thanks Ted,

However:

I think that there is complete symmetry if the big bang produced "fully entangled CP symmetric copy universe bubbles at a long distance"

Entangled even down to the Planck scale.

Then our universe is not any more unique and even humans have to deal with a shared consciousness with our anti-matter copy brothers and sisters over there ( inside the raspberry shaped multiverse)

[deleted]

Support for the primordial Black Hole evaporating Big Bang.

Millions of galactic Black holes found by WISE.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/news/wise20120829.html

Black Hole 'Bonanza': Millions Found by NASA Space Telescope called "Galactic hot DOGs"

Sergey Fedosin

Dear Leo,

Please see last post at my page about Higgs and other particles.

Sergey Fedosin

[deleted]

Dear Sergey,

What is the date or name of the last post you are pointing at?

Sergey Fedosin

It is last post at the page:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1410

Author Sergey G Fedosin replied on Sep. 19, 2012 @ 19:00 GMT

Sergey Fedosin

After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

[deleted]

Thanks Sergey for your 1.0 rating, the highest!

Yes all particles are nested in some way according to my Q-FFF theory.

The Higgs is the only 2D particle the rest is 3D and often nested (merged ) with other converted Higgs particles.

so the multiverse is based on only Higgses converted or not.

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin