Yuri

I did not understand your response post of 23rd. My last years essay was a top 10 finalist but not a winner (a crime perhaps?). Fair? and expert? I don't now, but the Solution, of course.

I just noticed your comment elsewhere; "We live in a universe that was born from a previous universe." which is entirely consistent with the recycling implicit in the essay and the Discrete Field Model, (and with my end notes this year).

The mechanism leading to this is as my current essay, unifying SR and QM consistent with Ken Wharton's view of re-mapping maths, but using non 'point' particles. The re-ionization mystery is explained by the 'rebirth' of galaxies via AGN quasars and their superluminal jets. The CMBR evidence suggests just a larger scale version of this for the universe.

I hope you will understand the kinetics and mechanism and score my essay, as I will yours, allowing that you are writing in a foreign language.

Very best wishes.

Peter

  • [deleted]

No atoms of space and time, there are only atoms of space, which name is Planck's constant or spin.Integer and half-integer.Even and odd.Yang and Yin.

Hello,

144 billions , I believe that it can be relevant for the maximum volume.So the begining of the contraction. This oscillation, unique is relevant. The cycle is unique.I see the max volume at 125 billions and the perfect equilibrium at 250 billions. So it is the begining of this eternal physicality.

The radius is relevant considering the maximum volume before the contraction.

The critical point of density before the contraction becomes relevant at my humble opinion.

Regards

The periodicity and the frequences appear when the uniqueness is understood.

  • [deleted]

144 is the twelfth Fibonacci number, and the largest one to also be a square,[1] as the square of 12 (which is also its index in the Fibonacci sequence), following 89 and preceding 233.

I deeply believe in the anthropic principle.

The fibonacci serie is just a serie of numbers. My calculations , them are based on evolution. I have compared several spheroids, foundamental of our physical Universal sphere. If we take the spherization like a foundamental of optimization.So we can link with several spheroids in evolution. The brain is fascinating in this line of reasoning with all its quantum entangled spheres and its rotations. If we make a simple graphic. We can see a correct oscillation of spherization.

The Fibonacci numbers are not sufficient. Like all series of mathematicians. That said, the primes are very intriguing when we distribute them inside a sphere in evolution.

I am also in agreement with both of these principles, the anthropical and entropical principles. In fact it is a little if I said that this infinite light above our physicality has created a project of optimization with spheres.The Universal sphere in spherization. The aim is the eternity in fact, a little if I said that we create the future universal perfect eternal sphere, perhaps it is the meaning of the paradise.The fact that this light is infinite above our walls is relevant considering the evolution. The future universal sphere is on the road of the physical infinity in fact. It is fascinating.

The primes numbers can help,with the 1 the begining of this physicality.

Regards

  • [deleted]

Also interesting when we compare the numbers 137 and 144 in the binary system.

137 (10001001); 144(10010000)

From the art point of view have something to ponder.

I don't know well the binar codes you know.

But why do you think that they are relevant these numbers ?

Why do you think that they can be inserted with this max.volume ?

  • [deleted]

See my submission http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0014

I prefer that you explain here if it is ok for you.

I don't like reading the arxivs and vixras.:)

ps the art is a pure creation where the foundamentals are respected.

Regarsd

  • [deleted]

No big deal, only 2 pages

I prefer no.

I beleive that you are a friend of Lubos Motl. You know the strings can converge but frankly the spheres in 3D are more more more foundamental than these simple strings.That said the 2d convergences are relevant. But can we play with numbers like we want. I think that there are limits , like for all !

The probelm with the m theory and the 11 diemnsions is that the system of uniqueness and the quantization are not respected. Like the evolutive point of vue. That said, it is relevant for the computing and the creation of forms.When the coordonates are correctly inserted. The 3D universality, this Universal sphere, it is more than these defromations due to the variables or superimposed dimensions(which are all in 3D , don't forget ). So the cause of mass, is not explained. Now the oscillations can be relevant. But for that, the volumes must be inserted considering I am repeating the serie of uniqueness.tHE ROTATIONS ARE ESSENTIAL ALSO LIKE THE SERIE OF VOLUMES DECREASING.

The correpondances, convergences can be made. Even for the 3D computing also for the pictures. It is even relevant for the ads/cft correspondance.The branes also can be synchronized.If the serie of uniquenss , universal for the two scales, is inserted with determinism about the quantization of mass.It becomes very relevant for correct simulations.

ps to all, who can ecplain me what is the BFSS Model please ?

Regargs

  • [deleted]

1.Lubos is not my friend.On the contrary, he is my enemy.

http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/07/archives-vixraorg-against-arxivorg.html

2.I haven't idea what mean BFSS Model.

:) an enemy?. but you know the hate is not good for health. Me I have not enemy but perhaps that for them, yes,I don't know, it is not improtant.The most important is to be universal.

The fact to have enemies has no real meaning for me youi know. The forgiveness is an essential parameter you know. I beleive strongly that thr secret is there, the universal love. The rest is vain. An enemy is not an enemy in this line of reasoning. I beleive simply that perhaps the simple probelm between both of you is the vanity. Perhaps that the arrogance of scientists imply a simple play of competition. It explains probably why a lot of scientists do not like to be critized. The syndrom of the searcher probably. I think that the vanity and the arrogance are more important inside the sciences community than inside a schools of young children.Perhaps that in growing we loose our innocence of child.

Make the peace with him :) like a child makes at school. hop in the hands. :)

BFSS model is Banks, Fischler, Shenker and Susskind (BFSS), it is correlation with Matrix theory. in 11 dimensions of supergravity.the steps of high and low energies can be classed. I beleive strongly that the serie of uniqueness must be inserted with the convergences with the rotating spherical volumes.My equations help for the steps of energies. The pure thermodynamics and heat are proportional with the rotations and the volumes of entangled spheres.the groups of uniqueness are finite and precise, implying a specific finite quantum number.This number is the same that our cosmological number in its pure finite serie, the finite universal group.

Regards

  • [deleted]

Appendix 4 Solution of cosmological constant problem

Theory: Cosmological constant is 10^94 g/sm^3

Practice: Cosmological constant is 10^-28 g/sm^3

Planck constant h=10^-28 g x sm^2/sec in 2D space embedding in 3D space

Only right value is experimental value.

  • [deleted]

Note.In the 2D space Pauli's principle is not valid.There is no need introduce the concept of "color".

  • [deleted]

Does God play Dice?

Yes,but when He play, always falls the same 3:1

    • [deleted]

    Another interesting point of view.

    Despite my assertion of continuity of time, need to admit: Every cycle of the Universe is a discrete unit.

    As promised, a few comments:

    1) If you try to find hidden relations using numerology, you have to be careful about selection effects. If there are no relations between particle masses, you may still find a few relations by considering at a large enough number of particles.

    2) I think that there are no fundamental dimensionful constants. So, I would side with Micheal Duff in that article you cite written by Okun, Veneziano and Duff.

    3) About cyclical universes, I would say that the evolution laws of any universe will make it effectively eternal. I.e. even if the universe evolves in away that gives rise to some state only once and would never return to that, you can use the evolution laws to identify any future state with past states. This is yet another reason (not mentioned in my essay) why I reject the concept of a physical universe :) .