Use of other languages than English might here be justified only in special cases, e.g. if one refers to a paper that was written in languages like Latin, Italian, French, Dutch, or German which are using the same letters and are more or less understandable to every Englishman while translations are not always available or their content is lossy.
Wladeju rucckim jazykom (I understand Russian), nonetheless I would like to ask for excusing my refusal to comment on the essay. I will merely take the opportunity to discuss the expression paradigm the author used in the title.
Thomas Kuhn popularized the word paradigm by introducing the term paradigm shift in 1962 when Einstein's 1905 papers were accepted by the majority. While the remarkable progress by Columbus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Leibniz, Newton and others actually deserves the denotation paradigm shift, there are many experts who doubt that Einstein's relativity is correct.
My essay primarily only questions Einstein's denial of the obvious to everybody separation between past and future. However, I found out that an experiment was inconclusive which gave rise to a theory by Lorentz and its subsequent modification by Einstein. See my Fig. 5 .
Eckard Blumschein