Dear Vasily,
I read carefully your essay, and an additional question taps my mind.
According to you what is the fundamental constituents of the Universe: energy, information, ...
and what information is not?
and what energy is not?
Thank you.
See my essay : http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1552
All the best with your essay!
Dear Mabrouk, information (structure) and energy-fundametal′nye components in the universe. Metaphysics means that the universe has a scope of abstractions. Idea-abstract object containing a mathematical model. Environment space activates thought in information (structure) and energy. This happens in the universe is moving stuff and energy. Man has a consciousness, which also activates the thought in information and energy. Consciousness-transcendental component.
Translation native. I can see that the translation is not accurate. In the first sentence, after the word Universe is the word-substance. The substance has a structure and energy.
We understand each other. Your esse I read. PDF file in browser or interpreter does not perevedeš′.
It looks like the translation is not correct. Esse have not read. English I don't know. In the browser, and an interpreter is not able to read.
Dear Vasily,
Thank you for your answer.
And my best wishes!
Hi Vasily,
I liked your essay, and I don't think that you should worry about the translation. I wonder about life and information a lot, and I learned some things from your essay. Thank you. I gave you a good "community rating". Ignore the "public rating" -- it's nonsense.
- Shawn
Thanks To Shawn. I believe that the United States is interested in metaphysics.
It was a translation of Bing Translator. Now translate Google Translator. Thank you Shawn. I believe that the United States has an interest in metaphysics.
In my opinion, Google correctly translated.
Exercising create thoughts. After studying mathematics and physics and received a metaphysical education, we conclude that there is little in physics mathematics. Mathematics emerged as a method of using the figures and numbers that are used to display quantitative states of matter. Isaac Newton created something new formula. The formulas contain characters displayed qualitative states. F =-F contains the abstract concept of mass. p = mv contains the concept of substantial weight. F = ma contains the concept of mass physical. These formulas are abstract. Abstract quantity can not be, it can be literal. The formula E = mc2 is literal. The formula E = hv abstract. According to the formula
E = mc2 you can make atomic bombs. This formula has no educational value, it is in school textbooks do not need. In the full thermodynamic formula M.Plank in which he found the quantum of action, provided information on the abstract sphere having for awareness and education value, replace with nothing. Physics necessary abstraction.
Some Canadians too. ;)
Some misunderstanding happened somehow written anonymous. This is my comment.
Hi Vasily,
Did you read Lorraine Ford's essay "The Universe Is Not Like a Computer"? I think it is related to your comment. Anyway, the essay is fascinating to me.
- Shawn
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.
Thanks Sergey. I understand that affects the rating. It's not about the number of participants, and the evaluation of the exposed participants. One man put 1 or 8 people put on 1 rating will be 1. This is logical. Additionally, uchstniki may have limited evaluation. Perhaps not everyone is given the right to put 10. Someone can put 3, someone 7, someone 10. I understand.
Good forum. Abundance of analytical information. Thoughts occur. Even write a new article.
