Perhaps it is not obvious that getting the "root" signals (a set of points on an (n-1)D shell) from all of the signals (a set of points on an nD ball) is a matter of ignoring noise and phase distortion. Came up with a toy "wavelet" reconstruction of the continuous signal to show how this "dimensional reduction" is straightforward and natural (even for toy models). Will add it in soon. I got a job in construction! Should be indoors. Bonus.
Looking around at all the comments from the past two weeks... Like I kind of hinted at a month or two ago: if this particular essay contest was not a psychology experiment, it should have been.
LOL. Outdoors!
Some discussion about the black hole entropy and gauge redundancy:
`Introduction to Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime and the Hawking Effect' by Ted Jacobson
`How empty is the black hole interior?' by Lubos Motl
`String Theory returns to symmetry' by Philip Gibbs (see comment about "gauge redundancy" of signal-states).
`What Would Weyl Do?' by Blake Stephen Pollard
I only include the following link because it talks about the "happyon". Uh huh:
v5 Added section on noise and phase distortion, touched up other areas. Not quite done.Attachment #1: 4_shannon.pdf
v6. Cleaned it up. Added a few more references. Mentioned the distinction between the signal space and the message space.Attachment #1: 5_shannon.pdf
v7. Added some more references (Foundations of Physics is free to view for now, so that's nice), touched a few things up.Attachment #1: 6_shannon.pdf
v8. Spell chek.Attachment #1: 7_shannon.pdf
v9. Added some discussion of signal-to-noise ratio and temperature.Attachment #1: 8_shannon.pdf
v10. Tried to make the discussion of temperature more coherent.Attachment #1: 9_shannon.pdf
Hello,
Tell him that a young belgian has found several relevances imrpoving the universal automata. The fractal is from the main central sphere, the biggest volume of the serie of uniqueness. The lattices disappear in the perfect contact. it is the same for our cosmological fractal and its number of spheres. If the space between cosmological spheres disappear, we have the same relativistic logic. It is relevant considering the encoding of evolution and my equations about the mass energy equivalence. The volumes of spheres more their motions(linear,orbital, spinal) are very relevant considering the universal proportions and derivations and integrations. The universal automata is on the road ....of a pure spherization.
Regards
Looking through the work of A Khrennikov. Emailed them... asked for comments, suggestions, criticisms.
Hello,
I didn't know the works of A.Khrennikov
I see also on google that Mr Khrennikov has made several experiments proving the indivisibility of a single photon.
It seems relevant. I ask me what is a single photon.In my line of reasoning correlated with my theory of spherization in 3D. The serie of uniqueness is also for a single photon. The serie of spherical volumes decreasing from the main central sphere can answer to several doubts.I beleive simply that we have uncompleteness due to our limits of evolution, indeed we are still young at the universal scale. We are far of our walls separating this infinite light without motion , time and dimension and the physical sphere in evolution with its intrinsic physical cosmological spheres and quantum spheres. The serie of uniqueness is very intriguing. A photon probably possesses this serie, this fractal. But we are far. The indivisibility is just a relative perception. In fact it is indivisible for our physicality, but not for an extrapolation of our mind.
The informations can be correlated with volumes and the rotations. The main central sphere like the main code, the biggest spherical volume.
Regards
I can sense the force in you. :)
:) thanks ,fortunally I have this force,this faith you know.It helps a lot when the sufferings are numerous. I am tired morally speaking but I have faith in this universal sphere and in this infinite light. We are jedis and the future is incredible....
I have seen the linnaeus university. I like the works of Linnaeus,Von linné in french. You know I have classed a lot of things. It is in classing that I have found my theory of spherization. It is in classing the mass that we can see the generality of dynamics of evolution. The amino acids are fascinating. The secrets of our Universal sphere are wondeful in fact when we analyze the pure generality.
They build these spheres of light in fact, they optimize , they improve the universal sphere.
Thank you for your kind words :)
v11. Minor touches. Contemplating adding something in about a shell of n qubits being modeled as a string of n 2^n classical bits, decided against it. Just added a link to fuzzball black holes instead. Pretty much it for now.Attachment #1: 10_shannon.pdf
It's all good. I do appreciate you coming by to leave comments on my page. In fact, you're the only one to make a direct comment on what I'm writing about -- the others are just passive-aggressive sourballs.
I do gotta love it when people give me heat for not including 50000 references to papers that are likely buried behind a paywall... when my argument is based on the notion that people are REALLY TOO BLOODY CHEAP TO PUT A REFERENCE TO SHANNON'S ORIGINAL WORK IN THEIR OWN PAPERS.
Jeeze, or maybe they're not too cheap. Maybe the controversy really does exist, and people weren't referencing this stuff like they should have been because they really had no idea about it. I sure have read a lot of stuff on black holes, and this stuff here is not exactly yelled from the rooftops by everyone... so... what's the deal, people?
Ahh, maybe it's because Shannon's dead and no one thought that anyone would notice. Oh, it's fun being a sourball.
