On Whether or Not Non-Gravitational Interaction Can Occur in the Absence of Gravity by Shawn Halayka

v10. Tried to make the discussion of temperature more coherent.Attachment #1: 9_shannon.pdf

Hello,

Tell him that a young belgian has found several relevances imrpoving the universal automata. The fractal is from the main central sphere, the biggest volume of the serie of uniqueness. The lattices disappear in the perfect contact. it is the same for our cosmological fractal and its number of spheres. If the space between cosmological spheres disappear, we have the same relativistic logic. It is relevant considering the encoding of evolution and my equations about the mass energy equivalence. The volumes of spheres more their motions(linear,orbital, spinal) are very relevant considering the universal proportions and derivations and integrations. The universal automata is on the road ....of a pure spherization.

Regards

Looking through the work of A Khrennikov. Emailed them... asked for comments, suggestions, criticisms.

Hello,

I didn't know the works of A.Khrennikov

I see also on google that Mr Khrennikov has made several experiments proving the indivisibility of a single photon.

It seems relevant. I ask me what is a single photon.In my line of reasoning correlated with my theory of spherization in 3D. The serie of uniqueness is also for a single photon. The serie of spherical volumes decreasing from the main central sphere can answer to several doubts.I beleive simply that we have uncompleteness due to our limits of evolution, indeed we are still young at the universal scale. We are far of our walls separating this infinite light without motion , time and dimension and the physical sphere in evolution with its intrinsic physical cosmological spheres and quantum spheres. The serie of uniqueness is very intriguing. A photon probably possesses this serie, this fractal. But we are far. The indivisibility is just a relative perception. In fact it is indivisible for our physicality, but not for an extrapolation of our mind.

The informations can be correlated with volumes and the rotations. The main central sphere like the main code, the biggest spherical volume.

Regards

I can sense the force in you. :)

:) thanks ,fortunally I have this force,this faith you know.It helps a lot when the sufferings are numerous. I am tired morally speaking but I have faith in this universal sphere and in this infinite light. We are jedis and the future is incredible....

I have seen the linnaeus university. I like the works of Linnaeus,Von linné in french. You know I have classed a lot of things. It is in classing that I have found my theory of spherization. It is in classing the mass that we can see the generality of dynamics of evolution. The amino acids are fascinating. The secrets of our Universal sphere are wondeful in fact when we analyze the pure generality.

They build these spheres of light in fact, they optimize , they improve the universal sphere.

Thank you for your kind words :)

v11. Minor touches. Contemplating adding something in about a shell of n qubits being modeled as a string of n 2^n classical bits, decided against it. Just added a link to fuzzball black holes instead. Pretty much it for now.Attachment #1: 10_shannon.pdf

It's all good. I do appreciate you coming by to leave comments on my page. In fact, you're the only one to make a direct comment on what I'm writing about -- the others are just passive-aggressive sourballs.

I do gotta love it when people give me heat for not including 50000 references to papers that are likely buried behind a paywall... when my argument is based on the notion that people are REALLY TOO BLOODY CHEAP TO PUT A REFERENCE TO SHANNON'S ORIGINAL WORK IN THEIR OWN PAPERS.

Ahh, maybe it's because Shannon's dead and no one thought that anyone would notice. Oh, it's fun being a sourball.

Hey everyone, let's pillage the dead! Yarr... LOL. Ok, I'll quit. :)

You know Mr Halayka,

I play also like a child. You know what ? You are still surprised by the human nature and its bizare comportments without universality You ?. The world is sick Mr Halayka but fortunally it exists people of well. It is the most important. The earth is a beautiful planet, but unfortunally only a minority is aware of this truth. That's why probably we have all these chaotical parameters. I don't understand the high spheres. They have a big responsability for the harmonization of parameters of interactions between mass.

Thanking you

Jedi,

I'm not really surprised by humans, actually. I knew to expect a whole lot of learned behaviour on display here that would go to show how the death drive and the God archetype are critically "important" aspects of theoretical physics.

I seriously wonder if this essay contest would have made for a great psychology experiment -- throw all the crackpots into a pile and watch them fight like dogs and treat each other like they've been treated by professionals (no names named, but the lesser pros make lists on how to objectify / falsely classify people for fun and sport).

If it's an industry based on love, like some FQXi'ers proclaim, then it's definitely a love that's in the closet, so to speak. Instead, all I'm seeing are cocky mathematicians with no game, making fun of the possibility of alien life because they have absolutely nothing useful to do or say.

... And then there are the "philosophers" who mistake noise for multiverse, while simultaneously spewing out death-filled nonsense about how religion is based on ignorance. Yeah, there's no professionally-generated death drive or God archetype going on there...

One consolation is that I will no longer have to sit and shake my head at those so-called professionals who sit around asking "who's the next Einstein?". The next Einstein has already lived and died -- it was Shannon.

At least one big fish at FQXi knows this, which I suppose is why they're asking the right question: "who's the next Shannon?". I dunno who the next Shannons are, but I wanna read what they have to say.

Oh yeah, a big hello to Professional Stalker Ibbitson. Am I being crude enough for you?

Feel free to leave your replies in a new thread if you like, so they don't get buried. Some people don't like that, because it makes multiple conversations hard to track, but clearly we won't have that problem here. :)

I left a reply for you below.

I'm not sure what the spheres are, or what the high spheres are. I don't have a grasp on the world like that. Consider a giant flaming meteor racing across the atmosphere; consider a microbe clinging to that rock, stripped clean by the friction while clutching on -- that roughly approximates my grasp on the world.

In case there's still room for debate: I'm more Sith than Jedi, but unlikely times makes for unlikely allies, I guess.

Haha, maybe I'm being too close-minded. Maybe there's an alternative Universe where I can crack open the first chapter of The Information and read all about how Shannon is the founder of quantum gravity, because HE IS.

All we had to do was have one positive, non-prejudicial essay contest, but we couldn't even do that, could we? And people say that I'm crude. LOL. Humans.