What Meaning To Give Percentages of 75% and 25%, Values Which Encounters When Studying the Components of the Universe: Dark Energy, Dark Matter, Baryonic Matter and Radiation? Is This a Coincidence o

[deleted] · Oct 5, 2012

Conclusion :

I believe that science does not work according to the number of points which we receive, or from our popularity to convince others to vote for us.

Of course, to win the contest, this could play a role, but not to influence the scientific veracity.

I also believe that the promoters of this contest are conscious of the limits of this form of notation, and they provided a mean to remedy for this.

It would not be desirable for them to highlight a work which is going to turn out in pure opinon, and to drop the other which may to convey a real foundation.

But as we can not change the rules, We must rely on our good star, and their good judgment.

In my soul and conscience, I gave a sincere notes to the works which I was able to read and understand, and which I find that they convey ideas close to my approach to the foundations of nature.

When I found this contest on the Internet, there were no more than five days to apply. During this time, I had to write the article, my first in my life, and especially to translate it into English on time.

I arrived there in disaster.

Some have criticized the quality of writing of the article, and I agree with them. I'm working on a remodeled, widened and improved article.

And those who are interested in this way of research have only to contact me.

And good luck to all...

EeAmazigh HANNOU · Oct 5, 2012

(It's Me and not Anonymous)

Conclusion :

I believe that science does not work according to the number of points which we receive, or from our popularity to convince others to vote for us.

Of course, to win the contest, this could play a role, but not to influence the scientific veracity.

I also believe that the promoters of this contest are conscious of the limits of this form of notation, and they provided a mean to remedy for this.

It would not be desirable for them to highlight a work which is going to turn out in pure opinon, and to drop the other which may to convey a real foundation.

But as we can not change the rules, We must rely on our good star, and their good judgment.

In my soul and conscience, I gave a sincere notes to the works which I was able to read and understand, and which I find that they convey ideas close to my approach to the foundations of nature.

When I found this contest on the Internet, there were no more than five days to apply. During this time, I had to write the article, my first in my life, and especially to translate it into English on time.

I arrived there in disaster.

Some have criticized the quality of writing of the article, and I agree with them. I'm working on a remodeled, widened and improved article.

And those who are interested in this way of research have only to contact me.

And good luck to all...

EeAmazigh HANNOU · Oct 5, 2012

Dear Sergey,

Thank you for the clarification.

See my conclusion here after.

Good luck !

EeAmazigh HANNOU · Oct 5, 2012

Cher Yuri,

ne vous inquiétez pas,

Lisez ma conclusion ci-dessous.

Et bonne chance.

Translation :

Dear Yuri,

do not worry,

Read my conclusion below.

And good luck ..

[deleted] · Nov 12, 2012

Very recently there have been unexpected advances in understanding dark energy. In fact if the claim of the Egyptian Scientist M. S. El Naschie is correct, then there is no more a mystery regarding dark energy. El Naschie's solution is disarmingly simple and was presented at two conferences which were almost entirely devoted to his work. The first was held in Bibliotheca Alexandrina early October 2012 and the second was in Shanghai a week or so ago. On both occasions El Naschie presented a revision of Einstein's theory leading to an equation very similar to that of Einstein's namely Energy equals mass x the square of the speed of the light. However unlike Einstein's equation, the result is divided by 22. His explanation of 22 is as follows: As in the old string theory of strong interaction, space time of relativity should have been considered 26 dimensional. Taking 4 only is what Einstein did and that is how he got his famous result. Nevertheless Einstein ignored 22 dimensions. This is a scaling factor following Nottale's theory as argued by El Naschie. Even in simpler terms, he reasons that Einstein knew only one elementary messenger particle namely the photon. He knew nothing about the other 11 messenger particles of the standard model which were not known in 1905. Adding 11 super partners it turned out that Einstein did not know about an additional 22 elementary particles. These are the particles needed to explain the missing dark energy. In this way El Naschie was able to show that 95.5% of the energy of the Universe is missing. Alternatively this energy was never there to start with because space time is a fractal and although it looks puffed up it boils down to very little similar to cotton candy. In addition the compactified 22 dimensions are the cause for the negative pressure which increases the acceleration of the Universe's expansion. He claims to have tested his theory using 25 different methods including Witten's M-Theory and reached the same result. Even more importantly this result agrees completely with observation. In other words mathematics and physics have been substantiated by measurement which led last year to the award of the Nobel Prize to the 3 team who obtained this incredible measurement and data. Click on this link to get more info re the above (under news) http://www.msel-naschie.com/ and also http://mohamed-elnaschie.blogspot.com/.