Scaling Laws in Particle Physics and Astrophysics by Rudolf Muradyan

Rudolf Muradyan

Essay Abstract

In 1973 dimensional scaling laws were developed for understanding high energy behavior of hadrons scattering at large fixed angels. The Part I of this essay is devoted to examination of this relation. In the part II of essay the Spin/Mass universal scaling laws are analyzed for cosmic bodies such as planets, stars and galaxies on the basis of generalization of the Regge-Chew-Frautschi string like relation to the two- and three-dimensional objects.

Author Bio

I worked for many years in Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna, Russia), Yerevan Physics Institute and Byurakan Observatory (Armenia). Now I am living in Pasadena, CA and affiliated with Pasadena City College.

Download Essay PDF File

[deleted]

Hi Dear Rudolf,

You have trust 3quark composition of hadrons due to experiments pointed to presence of its internal structure and form factor. Well, however the same facts may confirm other model as well that you may find in the end of mine work.

link text

Your style of narration is nice. Yes gnahatum em qo gorce.

I hope on your answer.

[deleted]

Dear George,

I remember, that some time ago I tried to one of your equations, using MATHEMATICA.

It will be interestin to know, how yoyr model describe real experimental data about, say, large angle proton-proton scattering at high energies?

Thanks,

Rudolf

[deleted]

Sorry, i don't know the empirical methodology of calculation to your question.

Bayc Dzes chanachoxneric mekn asac vor duq kargin mard eq ....

Sergey Fedosin

Dear Rudolf,

You describe the Chew- Frautschi conjecture for hadrons with the conclusion that it is necessary to use the conjecture at the level of star and galaxy too. I explain the Chew- Frautschi conjecture at the end of §12 of the book: The physical theories and infinite nesting of matter. Perm: S.G. Fedosin, 2009-2012, 858 p. ISBN 978-5-9901951-1-0. Some quantum relation for the Solar system are described in the article Similarity of matter levels. All these results follow the Theory of Infinite Nesting of Matter which is the subject of my essay.

Sergey Fedosin

[deleted]

Hi, Dear Jayakar,

It will be interesting to know how the Quark counting rules looks in your theory?

Sincerely,

Rudolf

[deleted]

Dear Sergey Fedosin,

Could you be so kind to send me by email (rudolfmm@gmail.com) some details about your approach to the Chew-Frautschi conjecture?

Thanks beforehand,

Rudolf

Jayakar Joseph

Thank you for the reply dear Rudol Muradyan,

Experimental validation for the existence of string-matter needs quantitative analysis of isotropically spin-correlated quarks in energy gradients.

With best regards,

Jayakar

Benjamin Dribus

Dear Rudolf,

This is very interesting. It is striking that a simple scaling law would have such a wide range of validity. I wonder how dark matter comes into this, though; it seems like the question of how one explains the dynamical anomalies usually attributed to dark matter would make a large difference to the angular momentum estimate. Also, I'm glad you pointed out that the quark counting rules have been re-derived from string theory; I wasn't aware of that. Take care,

Ben Dribus

[deleted]

Hi dear Benjamin,

It was pleasure to read your kind feedback.

I have feeling, that some "hidden" angular momentum with quantum-mechanical origin can eliminate the need of Dark matter hypothesis.

May be sometime we could discuss it in more detail.

Plese give me your email address.

Best regards,

Rudolf.

rudolfmm@gmail.com

Benjamin Dribus

Dear Rudolf,

It's a pleasure to meet you! My email address is bdribus@math.lsu.edu. By the way, if you would like to know why I am interested in problems of scale, I have an essay here too: On the Foundational Assumptions of Modern Physics. My background is mostly mathematical, and I am sure you will find my ideas speculative, but I am still learning. Take care,

Ben

[deleted]

Very interesting article from India

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1209/1209.3765.pdf

[deleted]

See my discussion with George Ellis

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1337#addPost

Sergey Fedosin

After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is [math]R_1 [/math] and [math]N_1 [/math] was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have [math]S_1=R_1 N_1 [/math] of points. After it anyone give you [math]dS [/math] of points so you have [math]S_2=S_1+ dS [/math] of points and [math]N_2=N_1+1 [/math] is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have [math]S_2=R_2 N_2 [/math] of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be: [math]S_2/ N_2>S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] (S_1+ dS) / (N_1+1) >S_1/ N_1 [/math] or [math] dS >S_1/ N_1 =R_1[/math] In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points [math]dS [/math] then the participant`s rating [math]R_1 [/math] was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process.

Sergey Fedosin