Hubble Redshift Despite Universal Contraction is possible. by Leo Vuyk

FIRST SIGN OF DARK MATTER IN THE LAB.

If we look at figure 11 and 12 you may observe the open silicon channels left behind by What I CALL:

EVAPORATING QUANTUM KNOTS OR DARK MATTER BLACK HOLES.

For more quantum FFF and cosmo architecture, see:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/

Leo,

Your opening sentence of the abstract is:

. . .It is well accepted that the Hubble redshift is a sign for Universal expansion. . .

What about Blue shifted Galaxies? An estimate says its count may be as high as 37%. How will you explain this huge percentage of Blue shifted Galaxies in a totally expending universe? We should simply neglect them is that?

Best

=snp

SNP,

My postulate is that dark matter black holes influence the light passing by.

Second

that Our Milky way is equipped qith massive Glaxy anchor black holes (GABHs) in double configuration. ( see image:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8615111826/in/photostream

)

As a result the distribution of blue shifted galaxies will be found outside these double cone areas and also outside the MW equator plane.

Third:

The distances to these blue shifted galaxies should be not very lerge.

Dear snp

In addition to my former comment:

Based on the idea of double cone shaped galaxy Anchor black holes as the origin of redshifted galaxies, it seems to be a logic conclusion, that lensed quasars will show the fingerprint if these double cone configuration of spiral galaxies.

If our line of site coincides with the lensing spiral galaxy plane, we may expect to observe a "Einstein crossed" lensed quasar. Otherwise we may observe an Einstein ring.

For more info see:

http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

The graphics used in this essay are breathtaking. Unfortunately, reality is unique. As I have pointed out in my essay, BITTERS, the Universe only deals in absolutes. Expanding is not an absolute. Red Shifts and Blue Shifts are not absolutes. It might be a good time for the astronomers to learn that each observation made through a telescope is unique, as is each observation of a spectroscope. Unique observations are meaningless of themselves and noting the date, time, and supposed fixed position of the observation adds nothing to the quality of the observation. You would never say, here is expanding, or now is expanding, or reality is expanding would you?

Thanks Joe,

did you observe more than one image? in the series called

"No Giant Central Galaxy Black Hole?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/72157633148982901/

see perghaps also merger Galaxy M82 as example of external Dark matter black holes in double cone geometry.

Hi Joe,

you wrote:

"It might be a good time for the astronomers to learn that each observation made through a telescope is unique, as is each observation of a spectroscope."

Yes because at the micro scale all atoms in the telescope are in motion!

however the blueshift of galaxies does not change very much over time right?

I forgot last message to attache the M82 picture with the galaxy's anchor black hole distribution (external dark matter)Attachment #1: M82_with_GABHs_2x.jpgAttachment #2: M82_star_formation_in_overdrive_2011_and_BHs.jpg

Leo, this is a nice essay. I like the use of visual imagery to demonstrate your points about form.

Could your redshift ideas have anything in common with the essay by James Burton?

Thanks Philip,

As far as I know, James Burton has focussed on the redshift by gravity lensing effect related to dark matter.

My proposal is that the vacuum dilution or thinning around dark matter (black holes) and the increase of the vacuum Planck scale itself is the origin of the redshift.

So the photon transport medium structure ( the vacuum lattice) is diluted and increasing by dark matter influence.

See attachments:

The vacuum lattice as a photonic information transport medium by dual oscillating vacuum particles temporarily coined Higgs..

You may use of course all my Flickr images see:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/Attachment #1: dark_matter_BH_diluting_of_the_vacuum_lattice.jpgAttachment #2: vacuum_lattice_and_particle_wave_duality.jpg

Philip,

For more details of my architectural proposal I made the next shortlist;

New Physics by the architecture of Quantum FFF (Function Follows Form)Theory.

Characteristics:

1: The clear MICROSTRUCTURE or the 3D FORM of elementary particles, (also called 3D-Preons) made out of convertible Higgs particles, is responsible for "Bound states of Fermions" and composite Quarks.

2: The Higgs is supposed to be energetic oscillating, it is the origin all particle motion and spin states and Dark energy (125 Gev) inside a truncated tetrahedron shaped chiral vacuum lattice. The lattice chirality (left or right handed) is the origin of our material universe. Higgs particles are zero point "Planck Oscillators" the origin of the Casimir force, waiting to be harnessed as free energy.

3: NOTHING SUCKS IN PHYSICS, Gravitons act with less pressure on Fermions than the Higgs vacuum (dark energy) and everything is ENTANGLED by INSTANT communication between at least two anti-copy UNIVERSES or MULTIVERSE, being entangled since the big bang.

4: Black holes of all sizes (down to ball lightning) do not emit gravitons, they feel only Casimir Gravity of the vacuum oscillations so they are massless but counter intuitively the origin of dark matter and producers of all Hydrogen by electron and Positron pairs as horizon fluctuations and repell all Fermions at the BH horizon.

5: The Multiverse is Pulsating by two phenomena, A; vacuum (Higgs) eating new paradigm dark matter black holes (causing the Hubble redshift) and B: by universal expansion caused by the oscillation force (Dark energy) of the Higgs vacuum lattice.

FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM in Quantum FFF-Theory. The Microstructure of elementary particles, is supposed to be the origin of FUNCTIONAL differences between Higgs- Photon- and propeller shaped Fermion particles. Something SMALL is missing in mainstream physics: a NEW splitting and pairing MASSLESS BLACK HOLE,the origin of all dark matter, Ball Lightning Micro Comets , Comets, Sunspots up to Galaxy external Anchor Black Holes and the Big Crunch of the CP symmetric pulsating raspberry shaped multiverse.

The multiverse is a huge pinball machine, with dark energy in the form of linear oscillating double Higgs pins as the origin of photonic collision products with the propeller shaped Fermions as balls. All forces are the result of this entangled Pin-Ball interaction. The 125GeV Boson recently found in the LHC is not a single but a double massless 3rd generation Higgs boson linear oscillating in tandem as opposing boxer engine pistons in a chiral truncated tetrahedron lattice. The 125GeV energy is the base for universal dark energy, the frequency is the base for local time and the length a base for the Planck scale. (Twin Higgs, Dual Higgs, Duplex Higgs, or Tandem Higgs) AS A RESULT, Free energy devices and electron-muon decay levitation is proposed. An unstable Higgs vacuum seems to be present around all black hole horizons by observed H2 production and annihilation radiation created by pair production of positrons and electrons. (Instability of the Higgs field) see: http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/LeoVuyk

Dear Leo,

The astounding graphics used in your essay are computer generated. They are perfectly executed and that is a problem. One real Universe can only be occurring absolutely, and perfection is not an absolute. We can therefore conclude that your essay has nothing to do with reality. It would not be beyond the skills of a computer programmer to monitor the scores of the essays published so far in this competition. That computer programmer could then easily write a program that could produce a perfect essay that would perfectly include all of the necessary information about it and bit.

Dear Leo,

You said, . . . First: My postulate is that dark matter black holes influence the light passing by. . .

Dark matter concept came from mismatch of Star circular velocities in a Galaxy. If you properly calculate them using the mutual Gravitational influence of Stars, Galaxy centre and the External Galaxies, they will come properly.

Black hole is mathematical singularity and dont have any physical entity. Galaxy centres, which are assumed to be Black holes have diameters of about few Parsecs to Hundreds of Parsecs, trillions of times larger than Blackhole diameters. These Galaxy centres can be called DENSEMASSES.

. . . .Second

that Our Milky way is equipped qith massive Glaxy anchor black holes (GABHs) in double configuration. ( see image:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8615111826/i

n/photostream

)

As a result the distribution of blue shifted galaxies will be found outside these double cone areas and also outside the MW equator plane. . . . .

Do you mean to say there is difference between top and bottom cones in your above mentioned diagram? What is the difference? What is difference between outside cones and inside cones? You mean the Blue shifted Galaxies outside cones come near and the Red shifted Galaxies which are inside the cone and which are at a far distance will go away?

. . . . Third:

The distances to these blue shifted galaxies should be not very lerge. . . .

According to your theory how many Blue shifted Galaxies exist? Blue shifted Galaxies exist at larger distances also...what do you say?

Dear snp,

Thank you for your reaction.

Your first question: These Galaxy centres can be called DENSEMASSES?

answ:

I realize that for professionals it will be hard to change an old paradigm about GIANT central black holes.

However My new paradigm black hole is reason for external located Giant black holes in double cone shape and a what I call a "WHITE HOLE" in the galaxy centre as the origin of vacuum vector field polarization .

For the white hole see:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8615315975/in/set-72157633194972754

See also: two Chandra images of M82 with external x ray point sources (GABHs) grouped into two double cones more or less perpendicular oriented to each other.

Interestingly, also the Chandra team reported that M82 has only medium sized black holes in its center. See under arrow [A] in the next figure.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8672492330/in/photostream

Your 2e question: difference between top and bottom cones?

Answ:

I do not remember that I made that difference.

My picture is that the dark matter distribution around and inside our own galaxy influences ( increase) strongly the redshift

My quantum FFF model says that the raspberry shaped multiverse is a pulsating mechanism.

So if we see now large numbers of blue shifted sources, the you may argue that our universe is in the CONTRACTION PHASE ALREADY if we are able to find enough blue shifted sources spread over the hemispheres.

SECOND: Dark matter black holes in and outside all galaxies and many stars are the origin of redshift influence of background sources passing by these galaxies and galaxy clusters. Light rays that not have to travel along these dark matter areas are not influenced by it. They will show a blueshift in a contracting universe..

SO sources that are far away have statistically more chance to be redshifted than nearby sources.

See ;Merging spirals into Lenticular- and Elliptical galaxies.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8614005013/in/photostream/

Your 3e questionz; Blue shifted Galaxies exist at larger distances also...what do you say?

Answ.

See before; SO sources that are far away have statistically more chance to be redshifted than nearby sources.

THIS is supposed to be the origin that distant sources have statistical more redshift.

But this can NOT be interpreted as the acceleration of universal expansion.

For more on the Quantum FFF model:

http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Dear Snp,

For the contraction phase in a bouncing multiverse see perhaps my Vixra essay called:

New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, lead to

a Bouncing CP symmetrical Multiverse, and new experiments.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1209.0092v1.pdf

Indeed also computer graphics could be described in computer language.

However most of my graphics are based on the use of ink and pen .

see attachmentsAttachment #1: Quantum_gravity_S.jpgAttachment #2: Origin_of_synchrotron_radiation_S.jpg

Dear Leo,

I did not get any answer for my question from your replies. . . . .

. . . . . According to your theory how many Blue shifted Galaxies exist? Blue shifted Galaxies exist at larger distances also...what do you say? . . . . . .

Dear snp,

Sorry I was not aware of that.

After a period of inflation in my theory the universe(multiverse) is contracting as a whole.

SO ALL GALAXIES SHOULD BE BLUE SHIFTED.

Nxt reply I will show you the eppropriate grafic.

See the "PUSATING RASPBERRY MULTIVERSE"

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/72157633110603216/