Dear Sir,

Everybody is talking about it. But is not dark energy an oxymoron? Energy is only indirectly perceived through its interactions. Only because it is smooth and persistent and non-interacting, it cannot be called dark energy. If it interacts with others to be perceivable, it cannot be dark. If it does not interact, it cannot be energy. Its characteristic resembles a background structure. In this connection kindly note that:

Transverse waves are always characterized by particle motion being perpendicular to the wave motion. This implies the existence of a medium through which the reference wave travels and with respect to which the transverse wave travels in a perpendicular direction. In the absence of the reference wave, which is a longitudinal wave, the transverse wave can not be characterized as such. All transverse waves are background invariant by its very definition. Since light is propagated in transverse waves, Maxwell used a transverse wave and aether fluid model for his equations. Feynman has shown that Lorentz transformation and invariance of speed of light follows from Maxwell's equations. Einstein's causal analysis in SR is based on Lorentz's motional theory where a propagation medium is essential to solve the wave equation. Einstein's ether-less relativity is not supported by Maxwell's Equations nor the Lorentz Transformations, both of which are medium (aether) based. Thus, the non-observance of aether drag (as observed in Michelson-Morley experiments) cannot serve to ultimately disprove the aether model. The equations describing spacetime, based on Einstein's theories of relativity, are mathematically identical to the equations describing ordinary fluid and solid systems. Yet, it is paradoxical that physicists have denied aether model while using the formalism derived from it. They don't realize that Maxwell used transverse wave model, whereas aether drag considers longitudinal waves. Thus, the notion that Einstein's work is based on "aether-less model" is a myth. All along he used the aether model, while claiming the very opposite.

Further, only energy (potential/internal or kinetic/external) makes matter interact. By itself, matter is not interacting - hence dark. Matter has the characteristic of accumulation around a point - as is supposed to be in a black hole. Energy flows from higher concentration to lower concentration carrying information and leading to perception.

Regards,

basudeba

    Leo,

    Nice work. Counter-Intuitive to our usual understandings but pretty straightforward and well communicated through imagery. Do you feel like this model resolves the Pioneer Anomaly to your satisfaction?

      Dear Basubeba,

      I recently finished my review on the historic progress on my Quantum FFF theory and dark matter en energy.

      see:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leo_Vuyk

      I think this is the right answer.

      Dear John,

      Yes in my perspective, the Pioneer anomaly is originated by a fully new unexpected phenomenaa a copy of what I call galaxy Anchor Black Holes:

      Stellar Anchor black holes.

      see my blog article:

      New paradigm Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) outside Galaxies, the origin of dark matter Halos with point sources see:

      http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.nl/2009_10_15_archive.html

      see the text: with image of the sun:

      "At the same time we may assume that our sun is the remnant of an open star cluster, better: our solar system is the remnant of an open star cluster created by two "STELLAR ANCHOR BLACK HOLES" (SABHs) and the result of a former Herbig Haro object!!"

      This NEW black hole model is even the base for my explanation of the so called pioneer anomaly, bacause it influences the whole gravity system around the sun.

      See perhaps also:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Leo_Vuyk

      See perhaps also the image of the sun here:

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/8715616120/

      And other Flikr sets subjects to click on :

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/

      5 days later

      Leo,

      Great to see such a well illustrated presentation, but as an Architect myself I would appreciate that far more than pages of maths!

      Robert is not entirely correct about plasma being 'visible'. It has a refractive index n of 1 so a zero EM cross section. It also has high coupling potential and no loss of G potential. When combining to form molecular gas it does become more 'visible' spectroscopically (I'm also a Fellow of the RAS by the way). I see no real problem with DM as Robert suggests, although it should be from fermion conjugate pair production more that ionized gas, as our iono/plasmaspheric shock. My last three essays discus the (dark) matter and plasma in some detail.

      Very well done. It's a poor comment on the approach to scoring that you are languishing at the wrong end of the list. I'll certainly be giving yours the significantly better score it deserves when it comes to marking. Almost forgot, I've also studied and discussed 'Black Holes' in detail which are Active Galactic Nuclii (AGN's) not the nonsensical entities most theoretical physics treats them as. There are some excellent links in my past essays.

      I do hope you'll read and score mine. You may not fully understand it if you haven't studied optics but I'm sure (hope!!) that won't affect your view of it's value! Do comment or ask questions.

      Very best of luck in the competition.

      Peter

        Recent developements arouns Quantum FFF theory.

        The Splitting Dark Matter- Black Hole- Big Bang and the Cyclic Multiverse.

        http://vixra.org/abs/1306.0065

        Authors: Leo Vuyk

        According to Quantum FFF Theory, the FORM and MICROSTRUCTURE of elementary particles, is supposed to be the origin of FUNCTIONAL differences between Higgs- Graviton- Photon- and Fermion particles. As a result, a NEW paradigm of splitting-, accelerating- and pairing Black Hole seems to be able to accelerate itself by a -Zero Point Energy driven-self created plasma tails ( by a new Quantum Fluctuation process), to form dumbbell systems, of two or even more black holes. Inside Nebula these dumbbell systems are called Herbig Haro systems. Inside the early universe however these systems are observed as dumbbell shaped radio lobes at both sides of early galaxies (Faint B3 radio galaxies). Recent cosmic observations of the infra red and x-ray background radiation of the universe by Chandra and Spitzer space telescopes (CIB and CXB), suggest that even direct after the big bang ABUNDANT black holes already existed. This can be interpreted as a support for a Black Hole splitting Big Bang and a Black Hole pairing Big Crunch before, thus there is reason to propose a cyclic Universe. In Quantum FFF theory, the chirality of the universal vacuum lattice is proposed to be the origin of negative- or positive charged black holes and the origin of the formation of matter over anti-matter around negative charged black holes as in our universe seems to be the case. The chirality of the oscillating Higgs vacuum is supposed to be the origin of preferred Positron attachment with three different shaped monopole Gluon/photons for easy Quark formation without a lot of particle annihilation back into the Higgs vacuum. At the same time, the possibility of a chiral universal vacuum is reason to support the idea of a super symmetric raspberry shaped multiverse, with multiversal copy universes, instant entangled down to all quantum systems.

        So the name of the game is:

        The Splitting -Dark Matter Black Hole Big Bang- and the Cyclic Multiverse.

        http://vixra.org/abs/1306.0065

          My latest example of pairing black holes as the start of open star clusters.

          This time around the center of Andromeda, according to Qauntum FFF theory.

          see attachment.Attachment #1: pairing_Bhs.jpg

          Dear Hoang,

          The answer to it from bit or bits from it, is described in the FqXi program as follows:

          What IS information? What is its relation to "Reality"?

          How does nature (the universe and the things therein) "store" and "process" information?

          How does understanding information help us understand physics, and vice-versa?

          My essay is based on my theory called: Quantum Function Follows Form theory:

          SEE FIGURE 4:

          information is stored in the FORM and merging possibilities of particles.,

          i GIVE YOU SOME COMPARABLE IMAGES ON THE ATTACHEMENTS.Attachment #1: Particles_W_and_Z.jpg

          fOR MORE VISUAL INFORMATION OF FORMS RELATED TO REALITY, SEE:

          http://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/sets/

          Hello Leo,

          I really enjoyed your essay. I too explore geometry to give fundamental answers. I particularly like your illustrations. The CMBR one is very topical and up to date. Please take a look at my essay too.

          Best of luck,

          Antony

            Hi Antoni,

            Thank you for your supporting words.

            My latest geommetrical explanation is focussed on the magnetic monopole field consisting out of TWO different photons. see attachment.

            se also my geometrical proposal for the atom nucleus, based on magic number geoemetry.Attachment #1: Curled_magnetic_monopole_vectors.jpg

            Something went wrong with the 2e attachment. about the nuclear structure and magic number relation

            This is the principle of Higgs (TORUS) transformation into all other particles .

            The lectron and Positron are each otherse mirror images .

            Theu are simple propellers with a lefthand or righthand pith as you can see.

            TWO electrons or positrons can "hook propeller arms"side by side and become a COOPER PAIR!Attachment #1: zaterdag_6_oktober_2012_3.jpg

            Thanks Leo - I will take a look over the coming week - best wishes,

            Antony