This is the principle of Higgs (TORUS) transformation into all other particles .

The lectron and Positron are each otherse mirror images .

Theu are simple propellers with a lefthand or righthand pith as you can see.

TWO electrons or positrons can "hook propeller arms"side by side and become a COOPER PAIR!Attachment #1: zaterdag_6_oktober_2012_3.jpg

Thanks Leo - I will take a look over the coming week - best wishes,

Antony

4 days later

Leo,

If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

Jim

    Thank you dear Leo Vuyk, for your replay.

    I think the fundamental structure you have ascribed in your Alternative standard model is 1-D string segment rather than 0-D point like particle and this indicates that the structure of Higgs boson assumed is a closed string defined from a state of transformation. Thus your theory is well in accordance with the string-matter continuum that we propose. Whatever may be the scenarios we discuss, the information paradox seems to be due to the observational limitations on Information continuum, in that the observational information is probabilistic rather than realistic, and thus our real-time observations with nature have constrains with our existing mathematical capabilities.

    In this regard we have some arguments and conclusions in my essay that is posted recently. You may be interested on this in mutual benefits to have further developments.

    With best regards,

    Jayakar

    Dear Jim,

    I wrote before about my recent proposal for the dark matter origin of UFO dust particle dump and JAL Boeing battery explosion in the next article on Vixra

    http://vixra.org/pdf/1306.0218v1.pdf

    Dark Matter UFO Dust Particles or Quantum Knots in the LHC at CERN ?

    Quantum FFF ( Function Follows Form) theory states, that the vacuum is seeded with fast oscillating massless dual Higgs particles, coined Dark Energy of 126 GeV. recently found by the LHC at CERN. Now I try to describe the similarities between the characteristics of energetic Quantum Knots found inside Silicon discharge experiments in the laboratory and so called UFOs (Unidentified Falling Objects) described as "Dust particles" created "somehow" alongside the accelerated proton beam of the LHC, causing beam disruption and automatic beam dumps.

    For the JAL Boeing 787 battery explosion See:

    Figure 8, An other example of Quantum Knot heated globules found on an exploded battery.

    Suggestion for the origin of external stainless steel globules found on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner APU

    battery damage jan.7.2013 at Boston airport. Discharge Quantum Knot black holes seem to be able to

    melt stainless steel! Melting point of stainless steel is 3000 degree C! ( Globule diameter 30-120

    mu.meter)

    Hi Leo,

    I enjoyed your vixra essay. Some original ideas. Quite plausible!

    I'll keep an eye out for your future work!

    Best wishes,

    Antony

    Hi Antony,

    Thank you very much for your reaction.

    I hope you are able to understand that your Fibonacci approach is not mine, caused by my 12 dimensional torus shaped Higgs particle.

    My information system is based on these 3 hinges at the convertible torus, with 4x rotaional freedom each.

    The propeller shape of fermions which is the result, is also reason for a different fermion black hole relation. with three horizons around the black hole. see attachment.Attachment #1: 1_Triple_BH_Horizons_1.jpg

    4 days later
    5 days later

    Certainly a different approach around Fibonacci, but still original and imaginative. :o)

    Leo,

    Had a quick look though your vixra paper amidst all the essays. Interesting and nicely illustrated. Also much commonality with my 2010 paper (as an astronomer and FRAS as well as an Architect); http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0016 I'm please to have agreed with most of your conclusions. The only one I've found no evidence for is the identical handed raspberry, but do agree to a Chiral antimatter bias there, and certainly almost identical existences temperally as the recycling has probably gone on uncountable times, so logically deriving a form of 'life after death'!

    I describe a fractal galactic scale version in the above paper and track down how long ago. We should be in our second iteration this universe around.

    I hope you did get to read and score my essay. I don't recall any comment yet. If not; a little nudge now. Having finished 7th in the last two and been ignored I'd really like to finish top 3. I also hadn't scored yours so am very pleased to now as I feel it is very well researched, written and illustrated and should be rather higher.

    Best wishes.

    Peter

    Thanks Antony,

    In the meantime I gathered most posters into two Vixra aarticles:

    Poaters for the large scale and small ( quantum) scale.

    zee:

    http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

    In the meantime I made two new Vixra articles gathering most of my poster pictures for the small scale and the large universal scale.

    see

    http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

    Hello Leo,

    Nice essay you got there with a lot of potential solutions to cosmological problems. My own essay is on a different topic so I don't know if you will be interested. But you can take a look since you mention the geometry of some basic particles. A good rating from me should be expected.

    Best regards,

    Akinbo

    Breaking NEWS: The universe seems to contract indeed at some places.

    Scientists have started to look more carefully at the structure of the universe by analysing light from galaxies such as Barnard's (pictured). They have observed that rather than moving apart as expected, some distant clusters of galaxies actually appear to be caught in a space current, much like a river

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2366087/Expert-claims-massive-tilting-universe-admit-NO-idea-is.html#ixzz2Zltf9HSU

    11 days later

    Dear Leo Vuyk:

    I am an old physician and I don't know nothing of mathematics and almost nothing of physics,

    But maybe you would be interested in my essay over a subject which after the common people, physic discipline is the one that uses more than any other, the so called "time".

    I am sending you a practical summary, so you can easy decide if you read or not my essay "The deep nature of reality".

    I am convince you would be interested in reading it. ( most people don't understand it, and is not just because of my bad English).

    Hawking in "A brief history of time" where he said , "Which is the nature of time?" yes he don't know what time is, and also continue saying............Some day this answer could seem to us "obvious", as much than that the earth rotate around the sun....." In fact the answer is "obvious", but how he could say that, if he didn't know what's time? In fact he is predicting that is going to be an answer, and that this one will be "obvious", I think that with this adjective, he is implying: simple and easy to understand. Maybe he felt it and couldn't explain it with words. We have anthropologic proves that man measure "time" since more than 30.000 years ago, much, much later came science, mathematics and physics that learn to measure "time" from primitive men, adopted the idea and the systems of measurement, but also acquired the incognita of the experimental "time" meaning. Out of common use physics is the science that needs and use more the measurement of what everybody calls "time" and the discipline came to believe it as their own. I always said that to understand the "time" experimental meaning there is not need to know mathematics or physics, as the "time" creators and users didn't. Instead of my opinion I would give Einstein's "Ideas and Opinions" pg. 354 "Space, time, and event, are free creations of human intelligence, tools of thought" he use to call them pre-scientific concepts from which mankind forgot its meanings, he never wrote a whole page about "time" he also use to evade the use of the word, in general relativity when he refer how gravitational force and speed affect "time", he does not use the word "time" instead he would say, speed and gravitational force slows clock movement or "motion", instead of saying that slows "time". FQXi member Andreas Albrecht said that. When asked the question, "What is time?", Einstein gave a pragmatic response: "Time," he said, "is what clocks measure and nothing more." He knew that "time" was a man creation, but he didn't know what man is measuring with the clock.

    I insist, that for "measuring motion" we should always and only use a unique: "constant" or "uniform" "motion" to measure "no constant motions" "which integrates and form part of every change and transformation in every physical thing. Why? because is the only kind of "motion" whose characteristics allow it, to be divided in equal parts as Egyptians and Sumerians did it, giving born to "motion fractions", which I call "motion units" as hours, minutes and seconds. "Motion" which is the real thing, was always hide behind time, and covert by its shadow, it was hide in front everybody eyes, during at least two millenniums at hand of almost everybody. Which is the difference in physics between using the so-called time or using "motion"?, time just has been used to measure the "duration" of different phenomena, why only for that? Because it was impossible for physicists to relate a mysterious time with the rest of the physical elements of known characteristics, without knowing what time is and which its physical characteristics were. On the other hand "motion" is not something mysterious, it is a quality or physical property of all things, and can be related with all of them, this is a huge difference especially for theoretical physics I believe. I as a physician with this find I was able to do quite a few things. I imagine a physicist with this can make marvelous things.

    With my best whishes

    Héctor

      Dear Leo,

      I've lost a lot of comments and replies on my thread and many other threads I have commented on over the last few days. This has been a lot of work and I feel like it has been a waste of time and energy. Seems to have happened to others too - if not all.

      I WILL ATTEMPT to revisit all threads to check and re-post something. Your thread was one affected by this.

      I can't remember the full extent of what I said, but I have notes so know that I rated it very highly.

      Hopefully the posts will be able to be retrieved by FQXi.

      Best wishes,

      Antony