Dear Mikalai,
Contests FQXi - is primarily a new radical idea. "The trouble with physics" push ... In your essay deep original analysis in the basic strategy of Descartes's method of doubt, given new ideas, new concepts and conclusions One of them:
«Fundamental particles have an internal spin characteristic. While spin is internal, rotation in physical 3D space changes relative spin orientations. This we take as a clue, that a spatial order between particle events is an accomodation of spin relationships. Here some more work needs to be done to establish exact mathematical framework.»
It is extremely important: «exact mathematical framework». In an interview with the magazine "Expert" Nobel Laureate in Physics David Gross expressed as a problem of identifying the "general framework structure" of physics.
http://expert.ru/expert/2013/06/iz-chego-sostoit-prostranstvo-vremya/
Your mathematical structure may be a "general framework structure?"
Constructive ways to the truth may be different. One of them said Alexander Zenkin in the article "Science counterrevolution in mathematics":
«The truth should be drawn with the help of the cognitive computer visualization technology and should be presented to" an unlimited circle "of spectators in the form of color-musical cognitive images of its immanent essence.»
http://www.ccas.ru/alexzen/papers/ng-02/contr_rev.htm
In the russian version of a article: «The truth should be drawn and should be presented to" an unlimited circle "of spectators.»
In an interview with the experimental mathematician Ludwig Fadden said that "mathematics closes physics» (Ludwig Faddeev interview in the magazine "Expert" - "The equation of the evil spirit" http://expert.ru/expert/2007/29/faddeev/ )
Do you agree with Alexander Zenkin and Ludwig Faddevym?
Please look also my essay and essay FQXi 2012 related to the ontological justification of "Absolute generating structure"
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1796
http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1362
I think your original essays on the basis of active discussion and your thorough answer should be rated much higher.
Best regards,
Vladimir
ideabank@yandex.ru