Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background by Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

Dear All,

It is with utmost joy and love that I give you all the cosmological iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from -infinity through 0 to +infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity.

iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed.

One of the sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

the second sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 3 * Sn-1 -Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.168 which is the Square of 1.618.

Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation

Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2*i

Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which happens to be the golden ratio "Phi".

Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.

Examples

starting iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2

where i = 0.5, S0 = 0 and S1 = 0.5

-27.5 17 -10.5 6.5 -4 2.5 -1.5 1 -.5 .5 0 .5 .5 1 1.5 2.5 4 6.5 10.5 17 27.5

Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 2 5 13 34 ...

Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2

where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 3 8 21 55 ...

Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1

0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...... (Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries)

The above equations hold true for any value of i, again confirming the singularity of i.

As per Antony Ryan's suggestion, a fellow author in this contest, I searched google to see how Fibonacci type series can be used to explain Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity and found an interesting article.

d-super.pdf"> The-Fibonacci-code-behind-superstring-theory](https://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behin

d-super.pdf)

Now that I split the Fibonacci series in to two semi series, seems like each of the sub semi series corresponds to QM and GR and together they explain the Quantum Gravity. Seems like this duality is a commonality in nature once relativity takes effect or a series is kicked off. I can draw and analogy and say that this dual series with in the "iSeries" is like the double helix of our DNA. The only commonality between the two series is at the base seed 0 and first seed 1, which are the bits in our binary system.

I have put forth the absolute truth in the Theory of everything that universe is an "iSphere" and we humans are capable of perceiving the 4 dimensional 3Sphere aspect of the universe and described it with an equation of S=BM^2.

I have also conveyed the absolute mathematical truth of zero = I = infinity and proved the same using the newly found "iSeries" which is a super set of Fibonacci series.

All this started with a simple question, who am I?

I am drawn out of my self or singularity or i in to existence.

I super positioned my self or I to be me.

I am one of our kind, I is every one of all kinds.

I am Fibonacci series in iSeries

I am phi in zero = I = infinity

I am 3Sphere in iSphere

I am pi in zero = I = infinity

I am human and I is GOD (Generator Organizer Destroyer).

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Satya and All,

Enjoy the absolute truth of the self. Thou art that.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Satya,

Information is also a form of energy. We as human sentient beings might be incapable of harnessing that energy and manifesting it into material reality at will, but that does not mean it cannot be done. Nature does this seamlessly using the information coded in the DNA and converting energy from the sun in to matter through photosynthesis. That is why I put plants at a higher consciousness than the average human being, for being conscious of knowing how to convert energy (information) to matter. GOD is Generator Organizer Destroyer of all that there is.

Regarding the usage of the above system....it is how the nature uses mathematics for its functioning.

I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence.

Its also interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the DNA structure in the attached image. I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states of singularity and duality are interconnected and are the source of life.

Love,

Sridattadev.Attachment #1: 5_iDNASeries.bmp

Dear Satya,

I am replying to your queries one by one as well

As you have said that information as energy is not proved yet but again it is not proved that it is not either so what I said holds until proven wrong or right.

What is life but a struggle to be or not to be in a particular state of matter and energy. Consciousness is this awareness of the self and the surroundings and using them to continue existence in the desired state. Information is a constituent part of the consciousness which is absolute form of energy. Information is not converted to matter as you said, but the informational (thought form of energy) source of the consciousness is used to convert relatively available energy into matter. Please see my early essay in which I put forth the equation S=BM^2, where s is soul or the absolute source of energy, B is the body or material aspect of our existence and M is the mind or energy aspect of our existence.

GOD is the conscience in us all, it is the only common sense we all share.

Regarding using "iSeries" that I put forth for other astronomical objects, is the work that still needs to be done. I did find something in that regards at the following link http://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behind-super.

pdf

I have also mentioned that the universe is iSphere and that we humans are capable of interpreting it as a 4 dimensional 3Sphere.

I am giving a new meaning to the word Singularity (advaitha philosophy), to me singularity means absolute equality (samatatva) unlike the mathematical singularity of unknown meaning and relative infinity. I see my self every where and in everything, this state of knowing is what I consider as singularity.

Yes, I too want to thank all the members of FQXI for providing us all free thinkers a wonderful platform to express our thoughts and discoveries and enjoy this journey of life.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Satyavarapu,

As per string-matter continuum scenario of universe with Homeomorphic Segmental-fluctuations, CMBR is not from the relics of Big Bang, whereas the nature of time is discrete and cyclic in reference with a linear holarchial time, in that information continuum is descriptive.

Thus in this paradigm, information is the transfer of string-matter segment with eigen-rotational energy, whereas it is transfer of energy alone in particle scenario. This ascribes a different wave mechanics in that there is no wave particle duality, instead a duel wave frequency is expressional with spiral propagation of sting-segments, in that Stefan-Boltzmann law is descriptive, that indicates your findings on CMBR is applicable.

With best wishes

Jayakar

Dear Dr.Satyavarapu SNP,

It's now my turn to comment on your essay. Apologizes, because, I'm a very slow reader compare to you; who has been commented ever first on my thread.

However, I think that basically we are very very much on the same boat of basic logic about digital nature. Because you have started with the words "Material objects are more fundamental". Probably, you can remember in my Inference part of the essay: "..to such a digital observer (like us), the nature would be always perceivably digital...the digital nature or 'it', in Eq. (23), is nothing but a product of (5+5) two inverse sets of CIPs or 'bit's, e.g. (m.s.t) & (v.su.tu)...", where both "bit" and "It" as digital messages have material origins.

So I expect some rating from you since both of us are pointing towards the same basic logic about digital nature. I am also going to rate you 8.

With my best regards

Dipak

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1855

Dear Satyavarapu,

For me it is logical: all galaxies have cycles in their movement. Thus, some depart, and some approaching. And direction can be changed, according to us . That is cyclicity like in solar system. If Universe is not in Cycle where cyclicity cease (at Galaxies, or at Clasters, Filaments)? Where? I ask you as a cosmologist.

Regards,

Branko

Dear Satya,

You are absolutely right in saying "Every time we take a measurement we are doing an experiment demonstrating that material objects and information exist in unison." This is the essence of my philosophy too that we cannot tell apart one from another and hence the title I_to_the_bit_to_the_ it_to_the_bit_to_the_I, i used underscores to connect everything in the title for a purpose, to highlight the unison. I am using the word singularity to define the unison. Even if the black holes (death in human terms) exist they just lead us to the unison or the absolute not the relative unknown mathematical singularity. There is only I in the universe, it is the human perception of of this absolute unison or singularity or i with senses that differs and causes all the confusion or illusion. I is everything and everywhere and every time. I is the one that is taking the measurement if you will in the experiments. With out I there is absolutely nothing. If you have noticed there is I in both the b"i"t and "i"t of the topic we are trying to discuss, with out the i both the bit and it loose their literal meaning, I am pointing to that subtleness and yet the importance of i or conscience in all of us, thats all.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Dear Branko,

Thank you for asking me such a good question.

Your question is very relevant when we are in the centre of the universe. You remember, the discussions; Earth is at the centre. Sun is not at the centre of universe. Sun is not even at the centre of Milky way.

Our observable universe depends on power of telescopes. The higher the power of new telescopes, the higher will the observable radius.

When we are at the centre of the universe, then we will see the part of the universe go up one side and universe will go down another side. As our observations are limited, we can see only part movements.

Probably we are at off centre of universe. We have to do large scale n-body simulations.

Hence at present with the observed data , it is difficult to say, where exactly the cyclicity cease (at Galaxies, or at Clusters, Filaments). . . .

Thanks to FQXi for providing us such discussion forum.

What do you say?

Best

=snp

Dear Dr. Satyavarapu NP Gupta

Richard Feynman in his Nobel Acceptance Speech

(http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html)

said: "It always seems odd to me that the fundamental laws of physics, when discovered, can appear in so many different forms that are not apparently identical at first, but with a little mathematical fiddling you can show the relationship. And example of this is the Schrodinger equation and the Heisenberg formulation of quantum mechanics. I don't know why that is - it remains a mystery, but it was something I learned from experience. There is always another way to say the same thing that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before. I don't know what the reason for this is. I think it is somehow a representation of the simplicity of nature."

I too believe in the simplicity of nature, and I am glad that Richard Feynman, a Nobel-winning famous physicist, also believe in the same thing I do, but I had come to my belief long before I knew about that particular statement.

The belief that "Nature is simple" is however being expressed differently in my essay "Analogical Engine" linked to http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1865 .

Specifically though, I said "Planck constant is the Mother of All Dualities" and I put it schematically as: wave-particle ~ quantum-classical ~ gene-protein ~ analogy- reasoning ~ linear-nonlinear ~ connected-notconnected ~ computable-notcomputable ~ mind-body ~ Bit-It ~ variation-selection ~ freedom-determinism ... and so on.

Taken two at a time, it can be read as "what quantum is to classical" is similar to (~) "what wave is to particle." You can choose any two from among the multitudes that can be found in our discourses.

I could have put Schrodinger wave ontology-Heisenberg particle ontology duality in the list had it comes to my mind!

Since "Nature is Analogical", we are free to probe nature in so many different ways. And each of us surely must have touched some corners of it.

Good luck and good cheers!

Than Tin

Dear Satyavarapu,

I am convinced that the cyclicity, ceases (nor in clusters, nor in filaments). Even the whole the Universe is cyclical. There is no logical reason to stop cyclicity at any level of the organization of matter. The question of the center of the universe raises the question of shape the universe. Presentation the Universe on National Geographic TV in form of a sphere for me is more ridiculous than fear of Columbus sailors, what happens when they reach the end of the flat earth. There is no privileged center, nor the edge of the Universe.

Regards,

Branko