Quantum information and Cosmology: The connections by Angel Garcés Doz

Dear, Wesley Wayne Hansen. In relation to the two papers that you you show me, I find them very interesting. I am aware of the last experiment was carried out between entangled states, for measuring the velocity of remote longline action, in the case of finite and greater than that of light, safe. The results give a lower limit of c1.38 x 10^4. The upper limit that I can make out, is 54446.7c

The big question, I like: that's the real big question, which you do in the second post, and intelligently.Do not worry about not having sophisticated mathematical knowledge, for it is more important and rigorous logical thinking, that is the one that leads to ask the questions that are important, the big questions, that the most advanced science can not answer. Look I'm going to expose a relationship, that from my point of view is amazing, it makes you think maybe, in relation to that big question that you have done, and how smart already. It is a relationship that, by chance is impossible to be casual, and less to the degree of accuracy. Notice. First the data: mass of Earth, electron mass, equatorial radius Earth, Planck mass and Newton's gravitational constant.

speed light in vacuum.

[math]M_{earth}(function\, of\: g=9.80665\: m/s^{2})[/math]

[math]

r_{E-earth}=6378137\, m[/math]

[math]m_{e}=9.10938291\cdot10^{-31}Kg

[/math]

Gn = 6.67428 x 10^-11

[math]m_{pk}=2.176437508\cdot10^{-8}Kg

[/math]

1)

[math]M_{earth}(g)=g\cdot(r_{E-earth})^{2}/G_{N}=5.97728\cdot10^{24}Kg

[/math]

And here comes the amazing!!!

[math](m_{pk}/M_{earth})^{2}\cdot8=m_{e}\cdot G_{N}/(c^{2}\cdot r_{E-earth})

[/math]

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-phys-constants.pdf

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf

The answer to your question: God created all things.Today the world, both the scientist, etc, this conceited of his knowledge. conceited of his intelligence, when actually know much less than you might think. The arrogance has clouded their intelligence.As psychoenergetical, I have to say, that yes, indeed I myself have had experiences that today's science can not explain. Specifically: premonitory dreams with details, things that have happened after. But all this as you well know, is ignored by official science, ridiculed, etc.

I do not care what I say now, can mean the stigma in this essay contest.This summer, quite possibly, in June there is a large-scale event that will lead to World War III.If you are interested in this little paper published in vixra, here I leave

http://vixra.org/abs/1202.0064

With best wishes

Totally agree: For this reason, I have proposed an experiment at large distances, with entangled particles, to verify the existence or not of a temporary delay in the change in the particle B, once the measurement on A. It would take distances on the order of 40,000 km, in order to measure a possible delay of about

[math]2.4\times10^{-6}s

[/math]

, at most.The distances that have been used until now, do not allow a measurement, because of the instrumental limitation current time measurement.For a distance between particles A and B, of 160 Km (I think is the greatest distance experiment performed so far, including entangled particles), the delay time would be approximately ( maximum )

[math]9\times10^{-9}s

[/math]

. While that for current measurement apparatus, would mask the reliability of the measurement, for these times to be less than the extent of accuracy of the instruments.The last experiment conducted last year, allowed to set a lower limit of

[math]1.3\times10^{4}c

[/math]

. The upper limit, according to my calculations would

[math]\exp(\alpha^{-1}/4\pi)c=54446.74c

[/math]

1/Alpha = 1/fine structure constant at zero momentum = 137.035999073

regards

Dear Hoang, you are pointed the most important thing of this essay: "nformation was created and governance by one the Deity is also not too ridiculous."

Exactly: God created all things, include information.

See above in my responses one phisyco-mathematical fourmula that proof your assertion

Thank very much

Dear James: I have read your essay and you target the most important question of science: "Where did information come from to form

our universe from nothing? Does its beginning offer any proof?"

I could respond in many ways, but I think this I offer is of great beauty

The name of God in Hebrew: YHWH, whose numerical value for each of its letters is:

10565 Y=10 H=5 W=6 H=5

This number contains in itself all the features of the universe.

I will give several examples

1) Omega_b = barion density of universe. In my essay I demonstrate the calculation of this value

[math]\Omega_{b}=240-\exp(5+\ln^{2}(2))

[/math]

[math][\exp(\sqrt{3-\Omega_{b}})]\cdot\pi\cdot e\cdot\varphi\cdot\alpha^{-1}=10565

[/math]

[math]\alpha^{-1}=inverse\: fine\: structure\: constant=137.035999073

[/math]

[math]\varphi=(1+\sqrt{5})/2=golden\: number

[/math]

[math]e=that\: is\: the\: base\: of\: the\: natural\: logarithm

[/math]

Zero = infinity

1 and 0, 10 was divided into two (yes, no, one, zero, positive negative: duality) = 5

5 +1 = 6

5 +0 = 5

10565

10+5+6+5=26 ; the famous number of dimensions of string theory

2)

[math]\ln\ln(10565)/10=\sin^{2}\theta_{w}

[/math]

[math]\theta_{w}

[/math]

is the mixing angle electro-weak

3)

[math]2\cdot\ln(m_{Pk}/m_{e})=\sqrt{10565}+(\ln(10565)-9)+\exp\exp-(17/10)

[/math]

mpk= Planck mass ; me = electron mass

17= 1+0+5+6+5

regards

Indeed, it is much more important than what physicists can not even imagine.For example, in the sequence stairstep, which gives the famous number 163, obtained by the algorithm I have given, it can be seen, as I pointed out the results of each stair, and they are:1,5, 14, 39, 103. This sequence has two very important properties:

a) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)] / Pi + 12 = ln (mh / me)

mh = mass higgs boson = 126.17 Gev ; me = electron mass

b) exp(1)= aprox mpk/m_seven_dimensions ; mpk = Planck mass

exp(5) = mpk/mGUT ; exp(14)= very aprox mpk/sqr(e²/Gn) ; e = electric chargue

exp(39) = very aprox mpk/mVH ( integer part) ; mVH = value equivalent mass Higgs vacuum

exp(103) = very aprox ( integer part ) = mpk/me

c) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)]-1 = Omega(b) + Omega(dm)

Omega(b) = baryon density; Omega(dm) = density dark matter

d) (1/5²)+(1/14²)+(1/39²)+(1/103²) = 4.585376261 x 10^-2 (very aprox = Baryon density )

Best wishes & congratulations on your great essay

Angel

I wrote in your post essay the links of my work for koide formulas

I am very interesting in read your papers about koide formulas , neutron, proton, electron

I am very excited to read

Thanks very much, dear Antony

Regards

Dear Patrick your essay have points of great interest

Especially the factor expansion of the universe in the short time of epoch of inflation

This number, efectivaly can be treated to amount of information, similary of treatament of it in your essay

In my essay I have demonstrated that this pure number is exactly:

L(alpha) x EXP(EXP([Pi^2]/2))

Where L(alpha) = adimentional radius of inverse fine structure constant at zero momentum

L(alpha) = 3.30226866215...= sqr( 137.035999073/(4Pi))

Important to observe that: (Pi^)/2 = Factor volume sphere 4d

On the other hand: this number seems have connections with the order of Monster group

Order Group M = 2^46 x 3^20 x 5^9 x 7^6 x 11^2 x 13^3 x 17 x 19 x 23 x 29 x 31 x 41 x 47 x 59 x 71 = 8.08017425 x 10^53

OGM/10^7 ~ your number UBs

OBSERVE THIS :

[{In(10^7)-10}/10 + (163/6)]^-1 + 137 ~= 137.035999073

Your formula for the ratio proton mass to electron mass impressive

You can improve it with : -1/(8Pi +1) + 1/(4(Pi^2))^2

With this improviment you have mp/me = 1836.152675664

Codata value: 1836.15267245

The Universe macroscopically is 4d , but near the planck scale are seven dimensions more, warped in circles. This is my humble opinion deduced from my researchs

Thanks you very much

Regards

I read his essay and rate it

His essay is a mental prospecting physical sense of the information. I agree with the main points of their development, but for me it is also necessary to translate these ideas into equations correctly describe physical phenomena directly or indirectly observable.

Must always, in any discipline, a deductive-inductive logical analysis, complemented by a physico-mathematical scheme. I wish you the best of luck in the contest. thank you very much for your comment