Not know if you have read my essay. In the essay, I show, that must exist four solutions for positive total energy. And these solutions all involve energy and momentum components, imaginary. The existence of these unobservable states, virtual, giving the minimum value of Heisenberg uncertainty.

Similarly, this implies the wave-particle duality. This dual state, while not measured, explains the double path followed by an electron, for example, in the experiment of the slit.

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (imc^{2}+pc)(-imc^{2}+pc)=E_{1}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (imc^{2}-pc)(-imc^{2}-pc)=E_{2}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (mc^{2}+ipc)(mc^{2}-ipc)=E_{3}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E^{2}=m^{2}c^{4}+p^{2}c^{2}= (-mc^{2}+ipc)(-mc^{2}-ipc)=E_{4}^{2}

[/math]

[math]E_{T}=\sqrt{E_{1}^{2}+E_{2}^{2}+E_{3}^{2}+E_{4}^{2}}=2E

[/math]

[math]E_{T}=\sqrt{E_{1}^{2}+E_{2}^{2}+E_{3}^{2}+E_{4}^{2}}=2E\rightarrow min(2\triangle p\triangle x\geq\hbar)

[/math]

Note, as the solutions are paired Terms of positive-negative energy, and negative-positive momentum

fulfilled:

[math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}

imc^{2}-pc & -imc^{2}+pc\\

imc^{2}+pc & -imc^{2}-pc

\end{array}\right)=0[/math]

[math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}

mc^{2}+ipc\; & mc^{2}-ipc\\

-mc^{2}+ipc\; & mc^{2}-ipc

\end{array}\right)=0[/math]

An example, found experimentally, the quantum entanglement. This effect is where the key to quantum mechanics. It is recognized that the change in the particle interlaced, to measure her mate is independant of the distance and occurs instantly. But this last assertion is an assumption, not been demonstrated either experimentally or mathematically. On the contrary, if it is allowed that virtual particles exceed the speed of light, in their ephemeral existence. But what happens to a virtual graviton?

A virtual graviton, which has a typical energy of 1.5 x 10^-43 J

This implies, that his time of existence, according to the uncertainty principle, it would:

[math](\hbar/2)/1.5\cdot10^{-43}=351557484\, s[/math]

At this time, at least can travel a distance of: c351557484= 1.05 x 10^17 m

In other words, the perturbation produced in space-time, to perform the measurement on particle A, is transmitted, meaning through grid quantified spacetime, the particle B

After doing experiments with such long distances such as those between one satellite-laboratory and laboratory on earth could possibly measure the change delay.

Generally, the existence of mathematical singularities in physical theory; often tell us that the theory is incomplete. I am referring to a zero time in changing the particle B

But as nature exibe extraordinary behavior; must be demonstrated both theoretical, and experimentally.

Finally: an example of the existence of these dual virtual states, is the Casimir force. Force produced in the vacuum between two conducting plates

[math]\frac{F_{c}}{A}=\frac{\hbar c\pi^{2}}{240d^{4}}

[/math]

Regards

Mr. Doz,

In the above you state, "This effect is where the key to quantum mechanics. It is recognized that the change in the particle interlaced, to measure her mate is independant of the distance and occurs instantly. But this last assertion is an assumption, not been demonstrated either experimentally or mathematically."

William Tiller and Walter Dibble have experimentally demonstrated "information entanglement" in excess of 6,000 miles and have developed a theoretical framework, including some rather novel Fourier Transforms, which accounts for their empirical evidence. They refer to their framework as a "new" quantum physics, Psychoenergetic Science. Perhaps you would find their White Papers informative: http://www.tillerfoundation.com/White%20Paper%20VIII.pdf and http://www.tillerfoundation.com/White%20Paper%20VII.pdf.

William Tiller received his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Toronto, spent five years in the R&D department of a fortune 500 corporation, 35 years as an active professor at Stanford University before becoming Professor Emeritus, he's published over 250 scientific papers (dealing mostly with solid state physics) in peer-reviewed journals, holds six patents, etc. Why the orthodox scientific community continues to ignore his work with Psychoenergetic Science is a great mystery - to me personally!

With regards,

Wes Hansen

Mr. Doz,

You know, another thing, many of the essays in this contest come to the same It from Bit = Bit from It conclusion that you do. I don't have the mathematical sophistication necessary to fully appreciate your argument but I am sympathetic to your position. The question I have posed in previous comments elsewhere on the forum is this:

Many scientists like to point to simulations like the Game of Life and Tierra as demonstrating how true complexity can evolve from a few simple rules but every one of these simulations start with an ancestral pattern, where did the ancestral pattern underlying our very existence come from?

With regards,

Wes Hansen

Dear, Wesley Wayne Hansen. In relation to the two papers that you you show me, I find them very interesting. I am aware of the last experiment was carried out between entangled states, for measuring the velocity of remote longline action, in the case of finite and greater than that of light, safe. The results give a lower limit of c1.38 x 10^4. The upper limit that I can make out, is 54446.7c

The big question, I like: that's the real big question, which you do in the second post, and intelligently.Do not worry about not having sophisticated mathematical knowledge, for it is more important and rigorous logical thinking, that is the one that leads to ask the questions that are important, the big questions, that the most advanced science can not answer. Look I'm going to expose a relationship, that from my point of view is amazing, it makes you think maybe, in relation to that big question that you have done, and how smart already. It is a relationship that, by chance is impossible to be casual, and less to the degree of accuracy. Notice. First the data: mass of Earth, electron mass, equatorial radius Earth, Planck mass and Newton's gravitational constant.

speed light in vacuum.

[math]M_{earth}(function\, of\: g=9.80665\: m/s^{2})[/math]

[math]

r_{E-earth}=6378137\, m[/math]

[math]m_{e}=9.10938291\cdot10^{-31}Kg

[/math]

Gn = 6.67428 x 10^-11

[math]m_{pk}=2.176437508\cdot10^{-8}Kg

[/math]

1)

[math]M_{earth}(g)=g\cdot(r_{E-earth})^{2}/G_{N}=5.97728\cdot10^{24}Kg

[/math]

And here comes the amazing!!!

[math](m_{pk}/M_{earth})^{2}\cdot8=m_{e}\cdot G_{N}/(c^{2}\cdot r_{E-earth})

[/math]

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-phys-constants.pdf

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf

The answer to your question: God created all things.Today the world, both the scientist, etc, this conceited of his knowledge. conceited of his intelligence, when actually know much less than you might think. The arrogance has clouded their intelligence.As psychoenergetical, I have to say, that yes, indeed I myself have had experiences that today's science can not explain. Specifically: premonitory dreams with details, things that have happened after. But all this as you well know, is ignored by official science, ridiculed, etc.

I do not care what I say now, can mean the stigma in this essay contest.This summer, quite possibly, in June there is a large-scale event that will lead to World War III.If you are interested in this little paper published in vixra, here I leave

http://vixra.org/abs/1202.0064

With best wishes

  • [deleted]

If you think logically, the question comes down to this: so that, for example, a cell, which presumably comes from an evolutionary process, presumably; necessarily live in the external environment must know in advance external parameters; as terrestrial gravity, atmospheric pressure, temperature window; topology of the environment, etc, etc.This is completely impossible that something that does not exist yet know, for the wheel of fortune of evolution has knowledge before it exists, of these parameters, because if you do not know can not live.The theory of evolution, allow me to smile at me, is the most anti-scientific theory of all time.No claims on any side you look

5 days later
  • [deleted]

"Not know if you have read my essay. In the essay, I show, that must exist four solutions for positive total energy. And these solutions all involve energy and momentum components, imaginary. The existence of these unobservable states, virtual, giving the minimum value of Heisenberg uncertainty."

The essay was read and the question of scientific method compliance remains... testability.

Math provides possible worlds, the lab supplies the actual world.

    Totally agree: For this reason, I have proposed an experiment at large distances, with entangled particles, to verify the existence or not of a temporary delay in the change in the particle B, once the measurement on A. It would take distances on the order of 40,000 km, in order to measure a possible delay of about

    [math]2.4\times10^{-6}s

    [/math]

    , at most.The distances that have been used until now, do not allow a measurement, because of the instrumental limitation current time measurement.For a distance between particles A and B, of 160 Km (I think is the greatest distance experiment performed so far, including entangled particles), the delay time would be approximately ( maximum )

    [math]9\times10^{-9}s

    [/math]

    . While that for current measurement apparatus, would mask the reliability of the measurement, for these times to be less than the extent of accuracy of the instruments.The last experiment conducted last year, allowed to set a lower limit of

    [math]1.3\times10^{4}c

    [/math]

    . The upper limit, according to my calculations would

    [math]\exp(\alpha^{-1}/4\pi)c=54446.74c

    [/math]

    1/Alpha = 1/fine structure constant at zero momentum = 137.035999073

    regards

    25 days later

    Dear Angel

    Very admire your calculations, resulting in "it from bit = bit from it." I have a slightly different result is "it = bit from bit = it"

    at :http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1802

      Dear Hoang, you are pointed the most important thing of this essay: "nformation was created and governance by one the Deity is also not too ridiculous."

      Exactly: God created all things, include information.

      See above in my responses one phisyco-mathematical fourmula that proof your assertion

      Thank very much

      16 days later

      Angel,

      If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

      Jim

      Dear James: I have read your essay and you target the most important question of science: "Where did information come from to form

      our universe from nothing? Does its beginning offer any proof?"

      I could respond in many ways, but I think this I offer is of great beauty

      The name of God in Hebrew: YHWH, whose numerical value for each of its letters is:

      10565 Y=10 H=5 W=6 H=5

      This number contains in itself all the features of the universe.

      I will give several examples

      1) Omega_b = barion density of universe. In my essay I demonstrate the calculation of this value

      [math]\Omega_{b}=240-\exp(5+\ln^{2}(2))

      [/math]

      [math][\exp(\sqrt{3-\Omega_{b}})]\cdot\pi\cdot e\cdot\varphi\cdot\alpha^{-1}=10565

      [/math]

      [math]\alpha^{-1}=inverse\: fine\: structure\: constant=137.035999073

      [/math]

      [math]\varphi=(1+\sqrt{5})/2=golden\: number

      [/math]

      [math]e=that\: is\: the\: base\: of\: the\: natural\: logarithm

      [/math]

      Zero = infinity

      1 and 0, 10 was divided into two (yes, no, one, zero, positive negative: duality) = 5

      5 +1 = 6

      5 +0 = 5

      10565

      10+5+6+5=26 ; the famous number of dimensions of string theory

      2)

      [math]\ln\ln(10565)/10=\sin^{2}\theta_{w}

      [/math]

      [math]\theta_{w}

      [/math]

      is the mixing angle electro-weak

      3)

      [math]2\cdot\ln(m_{Pk}/m_{e})=\sqrt{10565}+(\ln(10565)-9)+\exp\exp-(17/10)

      [/math]

      mpk= Planck mass ; me = electron mass

      17= 1+0+5+6+5

      regards

      5 days later

      Dear Angel,

      Excellent ideas presented here. Very much along the lines of a theory I'm working on elsewhere. Like the use of Descartes' theorem. Also you concluded similarly to me that Bit is as fundamental as It - two sides of the same coin. Hope you get chance to take a look at my Fibonacci sequence based essay too.

      Best wishes & congratulations on a brilliant piece,

      Antony

        I already read your good essay, and rate it with 7

        The fibonacci numbers are more fundamentals that physicists think

        A very interesting example: the fine structure constan as a direct function of

        The golden mumber, phi; that is:

        [{[{(2 x phi^3 - 7)^4}/7] 21}/6 - 3 (163/6)]^-1 137= 137.03599907366175228= inverse fine structure constant at zero momentum

        163= 1^2 1^2

        1^2 2^2 =5

        1^2 2^2 3^2 = 14

        1^2 2^2 3^2 5^2 = 39

        1^2 2^2 3^2 5^2 8^2 = 103

        1,1,2,3,5,8. All consecutive fibonacci numbers divisors

        Of 240 ==> group E8

        And 1 ==> U(1) , 2 ==> SU(2) , 3 ==> SU(3)

        5 ==> SU(5) GUT

        [2 x In(mpk/me)] [ alpha^-1] = 240 = Kssing number 8D

        Regards

        Hello Angel,

        Thanks for reading and rating it - much appreciated. I think too that Fibonacci sequence must be more fundamental than thought, as they pass through zero, which is as fundamental as I can possibly imagine anything to be.

        Best wishes & congratulations on your great essay,

        Antony

        Indeed, it is much more important than what physicists can not even imagine.For example, in the sequence stairstep, which gives the famous number 163, obtained by the algorithm I have given, it can be seen, as I pointed out the results of each stair, and they are:1,5, 14, 39, 103. This sequence has two very important properties:

        a) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)] / Pi + 12 = ln (mh / me)

        mh = mass higgs boson = 126.17 Gev ; me = electron mass

        b) exp(1)= aprox mpk/m_seven_dimensions ; mpk = Planck mass

        exp(5) = mpk/mGUT ; exp(14)= very aprox mpk/sqr(e²/Gn) ; e = electric chargue

        exp(39) = very aprox mpk/mVH ( integer part) ; mVH = value equivalent mass Higgs vacuum

        exp(103) = very aprox ( integer part ) = mpk/me

        c) [(1/1) + (1/5) + (1/14) + (1/39) + (1/103)]-1 = Omega(b) + Omega(dm)

        Omega(b) = baryon density; Omega(dm) = density dark matter

        d) (1/5²)+(1/14²)+(1/39²)+(1/103²) = 4.585376261 x 10^-2 (very aprox = Baryon density )

        Best wishes & congratulations on your great essay

        Angel

        5 days later

        Thanks Angel,

        Likewise! I wish I could handle mathematics as fluently as you. The links you've shown are strong, certainly don't seem coincidence. I used the Koide formula along with the simplex geometries to relate the mass of the proton, neutron and electron from an expected 1/2 value to a result of 0.49999994.

        I like this sort of way numbers relate to the real world!

        Nice work!

        Antony

        I wrote in your post essay the links of my work for koide formulas

        I am very interesting in read your papers about koide formulas , neutron, proton, electron

        I am very excited to read

        Thanks very much, dear Antony

        Regards

        4 days later

        Hi Angel,

        Impressive formulae !

        I have noticed that you talk about surfaces in your essay (holographic principle), you might be interested in looking at my essay, I also think that the universe is kind of holographic.

        You seem to like formulae to describe the universe, so do I. You might want to check out my 3d Universe Theory. I think that if you play with the 8Pi-1 you will find a lot more. Let me know what you think.

        Cheers,

        Patrick

          Your abstract looks very interesting..

          I was drawn here by a comment you left on Yuri's page, but it looks like the content in your essay is exceedingly cool. I'll have to read and comment. Feel free to do the same for my essay. I wish you the best of luck.

          Have Fun!

          Jonathan

          p.s. - You should check out the FQXi Forum page for

          Dimensional reduction in the sky

            Dear Patrick your essay have points of great interest

            Especially the factor expansion of the universe in the short time of epoch of inflation

            This number, efectivaly can be treated to amount of information, similary of treatament of it in your essay

            In my essay I have demonstrated that this pure number is exactly:

            L(alpha) x EXP(EXP([Pi^2]/2))

            Where L(alpha) = adimentional radius of inverse fine structure constant at zero momentum

            L(alpha) = 3.30226866215...= sqr( 137.035999073/(4Pi))

            Important to observe that: (Pi^)/2 = Factor volume sphere 4d

            On the other hand: this number seems have connections with the order of Monster group

            Order Group M = 2^46 x 3^20 x 5^9 x 7^6 x 11^2 x 13^3 x 17 x 19 x 23 x 29 x 31 x 41 x 47 x 59 x 71 = 8.08017425 x 10^53

            OGM/10^7 ~ your number UBs

            OBSERVE THIS :

            [{In(10^7)-10}/10 + (163/6)]^-1 + 137 ~= 137.035999073

            Your formula for the ratio proton mass to electron mass impressive

            You can improve it with : -1/(8Pi +1) + 1/(4(Pi^2))^2

            With this improviment you have mp/me = 1836.152675664

            Codata value: 1836.15267245

            The Universe macroscopically is 4d , but near the planck scale are seven dimensions more, warped in circles. This is my humble opinion deduced from my researchs

            Thanks you very much

            Regards