Jim,
Have you got around to take a look at the " Yin and Yang " theory ? You might find some directions in that theory.
Good luck and best wishes,
Raymond
Jim,
Have you got around to take a look at the " Yin and Yang " theory ? You might find some directions in that theory.
Good luck and best wishes,
Raymond
Raymond,
I found your essay truly original and imaginative. A most noteworthy effort. You made me think 'what if?'
I would like to run some questions by you via email if I may? You can email me at msm@physicsofdestiny.com at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
Manuel
Manuel,
Thanks for your comments and I shall be writing to you soon.
Regards,
Raymond
Well done Raymond for your philosophical essay! If you like philosophy you may wish to view the judgement in the case of Atomistic Enterprises Inc. vs. Plato & Ors delivered on Jul. 28, 2013 @ 11:39 GMT.
Best regards,
Akinbo
Hi, Akinbo,
Thanks for your comment and I shall take up your suggestion !
Best regards,
Raymond
Many thanks Raymond!
best wishes,
Antony
Dear Raymond,
We are at the end of this essay contest.
In conclusion, at the question to know if Information is more fundamental than Matter, there is a good reason to answer that Matter is made of an amazing mixture of eInfo and eEnergy, at the same time.
Matter is thus eInfo made with eEnergy rather than answer it is made with eEnergy and eInfo ; because eInfo is eEnergy, and the one does not go without the other one.
eEnergy and eInfo are the two basic Principles of the eUniverse. Nothing can exist if it is not eEnergy, and any object is eInfo, and therefore eEnergy.
And consequently our eReality is eInfo made with eEnergy. And the final verdict is : eReality is virtual, and virtuality is our fundamental eReality.
Good luck to the winners,
And see you soon, with good news on this topic, and the Theory of Everything.
Amazigh H.
I rated your essay.
Please visit My essay.
Raymond,
You didn't respond to my post above but I hoped you may get the time to read my essay before the deadline. Some were put off by the dense Abstract but please don't be, Georgina was but commented how readable the essay was.
The critics reviews in the blogs include the superlatives; "groundbreaking", "clearly significant", "astonishing", "fantastic job", "wonderful", "remarkable!", "deeply impressed", etc. Now in it's last few days! I'd love your view on my radical and almost infinite recursive 'ying-yang' universe.
Very best wishes.
Peter
Raymond,
Apologies, now suffering information overload, I see you did do so! A quick search function on block posts would be a brilliant time saving tool!
Very best of luck for a late charge.
Peter
Raymond,
Apologies, now suffering information overload, I see you did do so! A quick search function on block posts would be a brilliant time saving tool!
Very best of luck for a late charge.
Peter
Amazigh,
Thanks for your heads-up and I shall read your essay ASAP !
Good luck,
Raymond
Peter,
Thanks to all 3 postings. Messages are acknowledged and wishing you good luck and every success in all your endeavours !
Raymond
Raymond,
Nice essay. Not the run of the mill stuff. Deserves a higher place. So does mine perhaps, but really only a bit of fantasy.
Regards.
Richard
Dear Raymond,
I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.
I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.
You can find the latest version of my essay here:
http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf
(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).
May the best essays win!
Kind regards,
Paul Borrill
paul at borrill dot com
Richard,
Thanks for your comment ; I want to take a good looking into your essay. Could I have the name of your essay and the date of its submission ?
Regards,
Raymond
P.S., your email address, too !
Dear Paul,
I would do just that and thanks for your heads-up.
Regards,
Raymond