It’s Fibonacci’s Bit - Seeding the Universe with 0 and 1 by Antony Ryan

Dear Anthony. Hello, and apologies if this does not apply to you. I have read and rated your essay and about 50 others. If you have not read, or did not rate my essay, The Cloud of Unknowing please consider doing so. With best wishes.

Vladimir

Hi Anthony -

It's very interesting to see the Cosmos expressed in a system based on numbers. You make this approach intriguing even to non-mathematicians. No small accomplishment.

The 'chicken and egg' relation of It and Bit you describe, echoes my own view of their correlation in a greater energy field.

I hope you'll be kind enough to read and rate my essay which accounts for many of the phenomena you describe, but more structurally - or in physical terms, if you will.

All the best,

John

The Higgs Vacuum, the Higgs boson, the seven extra dimensions and the fibonacci serie,limited to the five fibonacci numbers divisor of 240, Kissing number in 8d, and the 240 non zero roots of group E8.

mh = Higgs boson ; mVH = value of Higgs vacuum ; me = electron mass

1)

[math]

m_{h}=mVH\cdot P(2,l_{7})=126.177\: Gev

[/math]

2)

[math]m_{h}=mVH\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})[/math]

3)

[math]246.221202\, Gev\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})=126.177\: Gev[/math]

4)

[math]l_{7}=3.0579009561..=[(2\cdot(2\pi)^{7})/(16\pi^{3}/15)]^{1/9}[/math]

5)

[math]lenght\,7d\, ratio\: to\: l\, Planck=l_{7}[/math]

6)

[math]\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

7)

[math]1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot8=240\;240\pm1=(239,241)\,(twin\, primes)

[/math]

8)

[math](8^{6}-5^{6}-3^{6}-2^{6}-1^{6})+(8^{3}+5^{3}+3^{3}+2^{3}+1^{3})-\sqrt{8^{6}+5^{6}+3^{6}+2^{6}+1^{6}}-1..

[/math]

9)

[math]..-\cos\theta_{GUT}=\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

10)

[math]\theta_{GUT}=angle\: unification\, theories\: SU(5)

[/math]

Regards for everybody

Hi Anthony -

Thanks for stopping by my page and reading my essay. Your kind comments were most appreciated.

I only wish we could permit ourselves a more detailed analysis of each other's work - but there are so many works to read, and to rate, in order to make the contest as valid as possible for everyone.

Thanks again, Anthony - and best of luck in the contest!

John

Dear Antony I am very interesting in forms of koide formulas, for stong connections to electric chargue, the mass, and the square root of ratios of masses ( implications of existence of imaginary masses non observables)

Do you like let me read yours papers for this question?

I put here my paper for the masses of quarks obtained in koide form and solely with the sin and cos of Cabibbo angle. The formulas are very simple and very accurate

Thanks!!!

Simple Formulas that Generates the Quarks Masses

Authors: A. Garcés Doz

In this paper we present a very simple formulas that generate the quark masses as a very direct functions sine and cosine of the Cabibbo angle. The accuracy of the results are very big in relation to the latest experimental values.

http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0015

Hi Anthony,

If nothing can escape from behind the event horizon of a black hole, no photons nor gravitons so an outside observer cannot interact with what's inside, then to him all positions within the horizon would be physically identical. Though such a thing is possible in a mathematical space where all points are defined to be identical but for their coordinate numbers, this is impossible in a physical space where different points by definition are different physically, so the diameter of the event horizon cannot be non-zero so a black hole doesn't have an event horizon. I'm afraid that there's something wrong with general relativity, that part of it describes the physics of a fictitious universe (see my post at this thread).

I do, however, agree with your statement that ''It and Bit appear equally fundamental - a sort of ''chicken and egg'' relationship.''

The information as embodied in particle properties (which can be thought of as internalized rules of behavior, the expression of laws of physics) in a self-creating universe must be the product of a trial-and-error evolution. If 'its', particles, particle properties must be as much the cause as the effect of their interactions, of a continuous energy/information exchange, then information only can evolve, become information when molded into material particles and tested in actual particle interactions: only such information survives which enables its embodiments to survive, to manifest themselves as real particles. So you cannot have one without the other indeed.

Best, Anton