Peter,
Thank you for reading my paper and for your comments. Do have a look at my papers. Yes, I ran out of space, but my goal was to show the true nature of the current models and how we can begin to start actually theorizing about the physical world. We will, and we must go beyond these observer-based models. No one has ever tried to defend these models against the criticisms I've raised.
The QED paper may be of particular interest to you as it deals with the issues you discuss in your paper. It shows that all "single photon" experiments are based upon a false hypothesis, as you've asserted.
Dark matter particles are the atomistic fix for our inadequate models of gravity--the Newtonian and Einsteinian. There are many problems with any theory of these particles. I'm interested in what evidence you believe exists for actual baryonic dark matter particles--evidence that cannot possibly be explained by spatial mechanisms such as I've proposed. I go into more detail about these mechanisms in the paper "Implications of Flowing Space" linked above, but you should read the paper on the flowing space theory of gravity first to see how well it fits and explains the facts about gravity.
Best wishes,
Henry