Model Mechanics: A Proposed Theory of Everything by Ken Hon Seto

Dear Ken Hon Seto,

I will give you high rating if you go through my essay and post your comments on it in my thread.

Regards and good luck in the contest,

Sreenath

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

Hi Ken,

I invite you to read my essay and also put a fair rating. I read with interest the study on your site. Regards, Vladimir

Ken,

I truly enjoyed your insight and innovative theory of Model Mechanics. Although you have a different approach than I do, I find your analytical findings inspiring and most worthy of merit.

I have visited your web site and have bookmarked it for future reading. I wish you good luck with your entry.

Best wishes,

Manuel

Dear Ken,

Thanks for your kind comments on my essay and also for rating it very highly. Just now I have also rated your essay accordingly with maximum possible points.

Sincerely,

Sreenath

Ken

Richard Feynman in his Nobel Acceptance Speech

(http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html)

said: "It always seems odd to me that the fundamental laws of physics, when discovered, can appear in so many different forms that are not apparently identical at first, but with a little mathematical fiddling you can show the relationship. And example of this is the Schrodinger equation and the Heisenberg formulation of quantum mechanics. I don't know why that is - it remains a mystery, but it was something I learned from experience. There is always another way to say the same thing that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before. I don't know what the reason for this is. I think it is somehow a representation of the simplicity of nature."

I too believe in the simplicity of nature, and I am glad that Richard Feynman, a Nobel-winning famous physicist, also believe in the same thing I do, but I had come to my belief long before I knew about that particular statement.

The belief that "Nature is simple" is however being expressed differently in my essay "Analogical Engine" linked to http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1865 .

Specifically though, I said "Planck constant is the Mother of All Dualities" and I put it schematically as: wave-particle ~ quantum-classical ~ gene-protein ~ analogy- reasoning ~ linear-nonlinear ~ connected-notconnected ~ computable-notcomputable ~ mind-body ~ Bit-It ~ variation-selection ~ freedom-determinism ... and so on.

Taken two at a time, it can be read as "what quantum is to classical" is similar to (~) "what wave is to particle." You can choose any two from among the multitudes that can be found in our discourses.

I could have put Schrodinger wave ontology-Heisenberg particle ontology duality in the list had it comes to my mind!

Since "Nature is Analogical", we are free to probe nature in so many different ways. And each of us surely must have touched some corners of it.

Good luck and good cheers!

Than Tin

Dear Ken,

A model worth looking at. In particular I will study more your mechanism for action-at-a distance. Will appreciate a look at my essay and rate if you like it.

Thanks,

Akinbo

Dear Ken,

I think you have been very brave to put your fundamental ideas out here. I was afraid to! I have a theory of everything, so enjoyed reading yours. I've partly unified the four forces and resolved the three paradoxes of cosmogony. For this reason I rate you top marks. I think you deserve to have more ratings and comments, and be read much more! Please take a look at my essay if you get chance - although not my main theory of everything, it is creating waves like yours seems to be - which is good.

Best wishes & kind regards,

Antony

Ken,

Thanks. I hope you can read and score my essay by the deadline if you haven't yet done so, and give me your opinion.

Please don't be put off as some have by the dense abstract, the essay itself is very readable with blog comments including; "groundbreaking, clearly significant, astonishing, fantastic job, wonderful, remarkable!, deeply impressed", etc.聽 I believe the ontology I construct is fundamentally consistent with model mechanics as well presented in your excellent essay, but am very interested in your own views.

Very best of luck in the final scoring. I believe and hope you agree mine is also worth a top score. Best wishes.

Peter

Dear Ken,

I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

You can find the latest version of my essay here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

May the best essays win!

Kind regards,

Paul Borrill

paul at borrill dot com

Hi Ken,

The link to your website doesn't seem to work. Do you have another place where it's posted.

Thanks,

Antony