I_to the_bit_to the_it_to the bit_to the_I by sridattadev kancharla

Hello Sridattadev,

That was a lovely essay. But I was confused where you said 0 = infinity. Perhaps you may read my essay also and rate.

Best regards,

Akinbo

Dear Sridattadev,

A very short article but many relevant issues.

I have a simple but difficult question, I think: what is reality?

Is there one or more ?

Thank you and good luck.

Please visit My essay.

Thanks Sridattadev

love

Wilhelmus

Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for appreciating my essay.

Interesting video with prime numbers in DNA.

Numbers and eDuality are in all things.

I rated your essay accordingly to my appreciation.

Respectfully, and good luck.

Please visit My essay.

Dear Sridattadev,

Again me. Your fundamental equation is

zero = i = infinity

(but i can be 1, any number, you say).

just because your maths are not sophisticated enogh.

I use Grotendieck's formalism of "dessins d'enfants" (child's drawings) where 0, 1 and infy are the only singular points on a Riemann surface (genus 0 -> the Riemann sphere). I suspect you need to look at this work to better establish your deep feelings.

http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1789

Best regards,

Michel

Dear Sridattadev,

Thanks for a precise but a very short essay. I think your "I" somehow linked with the VEDANTA's concepts of ANTMA and PARAMATMA, where at fundamental level that "I" may consider as "0", "infinity" or anyother numbers, that does not make any difference.

But in digital-sphere of present process of scientific understanding, which has huge obligations to pass through the regular experimental tests, that kind of VEDANTIC concepts of "0" & "infinity" seems to be far from any of such experimentation, even if that is true in reality. That is why a kind of 'digital limitations' in our current scientific observations come into play. But who can say now that will be not be possible in future? Science rolls itself simply with experiments with the ages.

I invite you kindly to read my submitted essay in contest. I think in spite of some disagreements what you have said in your essay you must see lot of agreements. It all covers your concepts of "time", quantize concepts of absolute (but relative)"observers" and so many; you may even deduce there your concepts of "0" and "infinity" from Eqs.(23)and other Eqs. as well. You can also consider K as your "I".

Again my thanks for presenting such a deep thinking.

How ever can we mutually rate our essays?

Regards

Dipak

http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1855

Dear Sridattadev,

I believe we say the same thing in different languages. Please look at Child of Qbit in time. The Qbit is the mother and the Qbit is the child, because KQID believes that Qbit is all things and all things are Qbit. The Qbits creates and distributes itself through KQID Ouroboros Equations of Existence.

The math is like yours but differed in expression that 00 = 1 = infinity. The Existence is simply 1 that splits to infinity one by one. Thus 1+1+1...= infinity but it is still 1 and this one is Qbit(00,1,-1).

"Consciousness is a sphere of universal Schwarzschild radius (ranging from zero to infinity) with a central cosmological constant of the conscience or the singularity or the soul or the absolute (i), Universe is an iSphere. This simple universal truth can also be mathematically expressed as, zero = i = infinity, which I have detailed in the essay Conscience is the cosmological constant...

Relative reality springs forth from the absolute state of i via the mechanism of desire (bits) and manifestation (it)."

I like your respond to Michel above:

"If 0 x 0 = 0 is true, then 0 / 0 = 0 is also true

If 0 x 1 = 0 is true, then 0 / 0 = 1 is also true

If 0 x 2 = 0 is true, then 0 / 0 = 2 is also true

If 0 x i = 0 is true, then 0 / 0 = i is also true

If 0 x ~ = 0 is true, then 0 / 0 = ~ is also true

It seems that mathematics, the universal language, is also pointing to the absolute truth that 0 = 1 = 2 = i = ~, where "i" can be any number from zero to infinity. Any number on its own means absolutely nothing (zero) or itself (infinite or undefined). Only when compared to numbers before it or after it does it have a relative meaning. Theory of everything is that there is absolutely nothing but the self or i."

Again KQID put it in a different light if I understand your thought correctly we are saying the same thing in different form and substance.: 00 = 1 = infinity. That we are that Qbit ψI(CTE) in action in our relative Multiverse ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm).

I do need my rating to be higher, if you like my essay please help to raise the score, so that it can be reviewed by distinguished judges. I don't need the prize but I do need recognition to promote KQID.

If I am not mistaken, KQId is the only theory not only support you hypothesis but also calculates the dark energy of our Multiverse and computes many bits are they in the minimum in our Multiverse.

KQID is the only theory that I knows here that proves bit = it, and KQID calculates Sun lights into Sun bits; calculates electron, proton and neutron in terms of bits; set up equivalent principle of bits with energy and matter. Therefore, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it. Correct me if I am wrong.

Your essay is succinct but the idea is powerful. I shall rate it accordingly.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Great thinking Sridattadev!

Dear Sridattadev,

I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

You can find the latest version of my essay here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

May the best essays win!

Kind regards,

Paul Borrill

paul at borrill dot com