THE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCE by Wilhelmus de Wilde

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you Jim, I am awaiting your valuation.In the meantime I will read and rate yours, we need to support each other.

Wilhelmus

James Hoover

Wilhelmus,

Quite an interesting read, utilizing unique phraseology along the way. You cover a lot of territory and "conscious creality" as you go. I have always been intrigued with the biblical concept,especially after reading Joyce's Ulysses, "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God." The poetic phrasing and the deep meaning perhaps represent the concepts we are struggling with, more in support of your thinking -- I might say.

Jim

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you Jim,

It seems that the essence of most religions is compatible with my "thinking", which gives me a good feeling.

You can eventually read extensive articles that I wrote on the subject in "THE SCIENTIFIC GOD JOURNAL" http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/article/view/115 and

http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/article/view/232

Wilhelmus

M. Vasilyeva

Dear Wilhelmus,

thank you for commenting on my entry and for invitation to read your beautiful, thoughtful, philosophical essay. It reminded me of the old time alchemists forever searching the perfection at its finest in all aspects of life (and beyond :).

"The infinity of the now moment is not only the past or the future, our consciousness is creating out of all the shades of grey in the Primal Sequence a Creality , so the appearance of a materialistic universe." -- beautiful:)

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thanks Marina,

The thoughts of all participants in this contest give a good rainbow that announces good weather...

KoGuan Leo

Dear Wilhelmus, I read your essay with great interest. Your concept of the the "Primal Sequence" as "the origin of origins" is very similar with my concept of our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit as Planck's matrix of all matter and also as Maxwell's infinite being, but not his finite being. i also shares your concept of the NOW within the absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000sevonds. Please comment and rank my essay. Best wishes, Leo KoGuan

George Kirakosyan

Dear Wilhelmus,

I have read your nice work and I find there many for my valuable points that I will take in attention in my future works. I think we going to the same direction despite some difrence of our approaches. I hope my work may be interstig for you.

I will thankfull for your opinion on it. http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1804

Best wishes,

George

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear George,

I answered on your thread.

Wilhelmus

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Leo KoGuan,

"All things are one qubit" touches the "eternal Now" I describe.

"Each T-moment a new qbit emerges" Your T moment is relative shorter as the Planck time that i used, but I also mentioned that this moment wher there is no longer causality may be shorter (as in the latest results from ESA's INTEGRAL gamma ray observatory which have shown that this "graininess" of space is much lesser as the Planck length : 10^-48cm), but in my perception I have to take a certain length which of course is also realtive to our awareness. I lose you with the formula's Leo, this is just abracadraba for me, but I believe that your perceptions are touching your OWN reality.

In my perception the Total Simultaneity, where ALL T-moments are available for our non causal consciousness touches very much your perception of the "creation" of a reality what I call CREALITY.

I just think my dear Leo that we are both on the same path of discovering the Origin of Origins and the Reference of Reference.

I have great admiration for your causal consciousness that has established a deeper contact with Total Simultaneity.

I will rate your essay with respect and honor, as I hope you will do with mineand hope that we can in the future assembling of T-moments deepen our thoughts.

Wilhelmus

Don Limuti

Hi Wilhelmus,

I like your essay and rate it highly. You are to be praised for aiming high with clarity.

Of course I can nitpick a little, I find that the use of the concept of infinity objectionable when applied to physical systems. Just because an equation seems to indicate an infinity is possible does not mean that it is true physically. This is why we both like Planck Units of space and time and consider them fundamental.

Wishing you the best of everything.

Don Limuti

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you Don,

As a response to my last essay you mentioned to have a "very good idea" when I read your essay of this contest , indeed it is opening new thinking, the duality of a personality that is created by becoming someone else is also a way of a critical mind to find new ideas.

best of luck, I rated you highly

Wilhelmus

KoGuan Leo

Dear Wilhelmus, Again your essay is so wonderful, I am really touched by it. We share somehow some waht similar thought. We are the seekers of the truth no matter what this truth will lead us. Here my reply to your post on my column but I just want you to know here: "Dear Wilhelmus, I read at least 5 times to make sure i understand your terms and rated highly of your fascinating essay. FQXI receipt: "You rated this essay on Jul 10, 2013i." You wrote A "bit" (digital) can be any physical entity or a mathematical concept (zero or one) that serves to make calculations. Quantification of the bit or trying to find the Primal BIT of the Primal Sequence of all sequences cannot be realized easily because every emerging state, every layer of reality, has its own specific form of information quanta that are constituting combined with others to form "new" information/knowledge sequence." Wonderful! Your Primal BIt is our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit and the Primal Sequence is the KQID Ouroboros Equation of Existence: Ξ00☷ = ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) = KbΘln2 = hf = pc mc^2 = p^2/2m U(iLx,y,z) = 4πGρ- Kqid(ΑΘ-ΘS)gμν = (8πG/c^4)Tμν - Kqid(ΑΘ-ΘS)gμν = Τμν = E = A S ⊆ T that contains QM, KQID relativity, Landauer's bound, Planck, Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Poisson, Einstein GR with KQID dark energy equation and KQID Third Law of Multiverse as the equation of everything from physics to chemistry, law, employment, monetary and full employment. In physics as shown in my essay, this equation explains the Bit Bang, not Big Bang, plus its partner the Bit Crush and we can estimate the temperature about 7.8 x10^126K in the first burst at 1.43478x10^-147 seconds with the wavelength λ = 4.3x10^-139 meter, moreover when A = S our universe will inevitably start its contraction and acceleration to a Big Crush sometime hundreds of trillions years later thatI also calculated in two different ways. As you can see I made specific predictions with specific numbers that can easily be falsified later by experiments. We are the seekers of the truth and paraphrasing the great Carl Sagan, we are the Qbit's way to know itself and to evolve as the Primal Sequense as you brilliantly put it. We are brothers and sisters literally in our human senses but actually we are one in our Ancestor Qbit reality or in your terms Primal Bit realm. Blood and tears of Wang Yangming's red pearls, I sing and praise Xuan Yuan's Da Tong, Leo KoGuan "

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Leo KoGuan thank you very much for your warm reaction.

I am thinking of organising with people like you a little group to share ideas and perhaps together form a new perception of our reality, representants like you from China and Georg from Russia, i also know an emiritus professor in India etc, together we can DO something, waiting for your ideas

Wilhelmus

john selye

Dear Wilhelmus,

I am intrigued by how you essentially describe our physics' parameters as flexible borders, centered in the Human Mind. It is refreshing to see this view expressed, not only in terms of physics (your treatment of Qubits was most intriguing), but with references to metaphysical concepts.

This shows confidence in the fact that what is at one time metaphysical becomes in time 'physical'.

I myself describe a cosmic paradigm of correlated energy vortices that includes the evolving observer - a participant in the field of reality who makes decisions at every moment, and over a very long period of time, during which his relation to the physical world - his own biological configuration, if you will - is continuously altered.

You might be interested to see how I treat this evolutionary argument as a realist interpretation of the field of reality, thus expanding the definitions of It and Bit far beyond those signified by Wheeler, and concluding that their interaction is one of continuous and simultaneous shifts - or more precisely, correlation.

I believe my perspective provides a structure you might find useful.

I have rated your essay, of course, and hope you will soon visit my page.

All the Best!

John.

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Thank you John,

I gave my reactions on your thread.

Wilhelmus

Sreenath N

Dear Wilhelmus,

I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

Regards and good luck in the contest,

Sreenath BN.

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

Sreenath N

Dear Wilhelmus,

Thanks for your kind comments on my essay and also for rating it. I will soon go through your essay and post my comments on it and rate it too.

Regards,

Sreenath

Sreenath N

Dear Wilhelmus,

Yours is the only essay I have come so far across in the essay contest that answers what Wheelar expected when he put forth the question "IT FROM BIT OR BIT FROM IT". Because when Wheelar put forth the question he wanted the total review of our whole epistemological considerations philosophically and you have rightly grasped his intensions and accordingly treated the problem. Your discovery of the concepts Crealities and Primal Sequence have guided you in this endeavor. You have clearly stated how quantum mechanics can be explained from the neurological functions of the brain which implies mind, consciousness and sub consciousness. The problems of time and space are dealt with satisfactorily from your above considerations. Your conclusion that "REAL FREE WILL is residing not in our causal Creality of the universe but in the non-causal infinity" seems fantastic. The role played by mind and consciousness in grasping the reality in its various forms through information is simply imaginative and so is your concept of "qubit consciousness". We both have similar approach in seeking answer to the question raised by Wheelar through the role played by mind.

As a result, I have rated your essay with maximum honors possible and wish you best of luck in the essay contest.

Sreenath

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Sreenath,

I am very glad to meet someone who is in line with my thoughts.

Of course these are only thoughts based on the knowledge that is acquired until now, and that time "until now" is only a causal recreation of a time line, so the "eternal now moment" that is the origin of its creality (creation of history), so my perceptions are now valid for me but in the future and I hope that mankind will have a long future nothing is secure, only our thoughts of today can help to improve the possible futures.

I really thank you for your rating.

Wilhelmus

Manuel Morales

BTW - I have rated your essay highly and was wondering if you found my essay worthy of the same consideration?

Manuel

« Previous Page Next Page »