Dear Wilhelmus,

Thank you for appreciating my essay.

If I suppose that the Universe is information. And if I also suppose that the Universe is built from simple to more complex. Which system, to choose, a simple binary, or complex decimal ?

I rated your essay.

And good luck.

Please visit My essay.

    Thank you Amazigh,

    Two times "suppose",

    is binary "simple" ? No it is just the possibility of two choices.

    Which does not mean that other choices cannot be made.

    Even decimal is only 10 choices.

    I think that choices and free will are infinite.

    Wilhelmus

    Dear Wilhelmus,

    I want to let you know that I have read your very interesting essay. I found myself in agreement with your discussion of 'Crealtity' formation, (which I have been calling Image reality) but a bit lost when you got to the primal sequence. I'm not quite sure why, in your opinion, all times should be available to the subconscious mind. (You may have explained in the essay but it has slipped my mind, as I read it some time ago).

    Having said that, looking out into space there is potential sensory data that can be received from near present to light years back in time.It just depends what data is received in what order, to form the observer's 'Creality' including the subjective passage of time. But in everyday life the time span is limited by the distance of objects in the environment from the observer and so the time it takes for data to travel from source to observer. (Tell me if I'm not thinking about it in the correct way). By the way, you may find Ken Wharton's essay very interesting, I did.

    Anyway an enjoyable, thought provoking essay. Good luck ,Georgina

    dear Georgina,

    I waited a long time for your visit, (polished the house, made tea etc) but here you are . Thanks for the rating.

    Now about "sub-consciousness". I think that there is a difference between the so called sub-consciousness and the non-causal part of our consciousness. You could align them as follows :

    non-causal consciousness in Total Simultaneity : has "contact", this is not the good expression, it is embedded in all available pasts and futures should be a better description.

    sub-consciousness : in relation with the non-causal part and the causal part of consciousness, but closer to the non-causal part in TS, but then again how close is entanglement ? We just are failing to express these perceptions.

    causal part of consciousness that is imprisoned in the what we are calling "dimensions", causality and space. The causal part is existing only during our "lives" but is also entangled with its non-causal part. Only we have no control (yet) of whole UNIT, so we cannot influence the "choices" of our non-causal part. If that would be so (perhaps in a future) we would be able to realise the best past without all the misery that we are experiencing "now".

    so ALL pasts are in principle available , but we are only living one life-line. This is not the same as parallel worlds as I explained in my earlier essays, because availability has nothing to do with so called other "existing" universes.

    You see that our present life-line is telling us about light, black holes and so on, it is our mutual life line that is created through decoherence. It is only one the infinite amount of histories "available".

    The "observer" is its consciousness (singularity) surrounded by its Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS), the incoming data are treated by our senses (only 5 for us, there are more , see dark force and so on) so our partial experienced reality is once processed by our senses and system already history once we are aware of it. It is our consciousness that is ligning up the for the individual by its SSS collected data that creates the causal reality.

    I know it is difficult to understand, but I am still trying to find the appropriate words.

    Good luck to you also Georgina, and perhaps you will visit me again, I await you.

    Wilhelmus

      Dear

      I gave you rating *.

      Thank you for presenting your nice essay. So you can produce matter from your thinking or from information description of that matter. . . . ?

      I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

      I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

      Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

      Best

      =snp

      snp.gupta@gmail.com

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

      Pdf download:

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

      Part of abstract:

      - -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

      Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

      A

      Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

      ....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

      Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

      . . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

      B.

      Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

      Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

      C

      Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

      "Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

      Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

      1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

      2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

      3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

      4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

      D

      Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

      It from bit - where are bit come from?

      Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

      ....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

      Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

      E

      Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

      .....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

      I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

      ===============

      Please try Dynamic Universe Model with some numerical values, give initial values of velocities, take gravitation into consideration( because you can not experiment in ISOLATION). complete your numerical experiment.

      later try changing values of masses and initial values of velocities....

      Calculate with different setups and compare your results, if you have done a physical experiment.

      I sincerely feel it is better to do experiment physically, or numerically instead of breaking your head on just logic. This way you will solve your problem faster.....

      Best

      =snp

        Thanks Wilhelmus,

        I will need to think about it. I am torn between thinking I understand what you mean and thinking I really haven't understood you correctly.

        It makes sense to me that there are far more potential life lines than the one selected. The one line selected is making that observer's past. Being able to select a different past doesn't quite make sense to me, unless I think about re-writing the story stored in the memory, selecting a better one, to account for the stored facts. But I'm also quite sure that's not what you mean.

        Do you just mean that there is potential data in the environment that had the potential to be a different past? I might say the sense organs are bathed in the data pool, if I was to refer to my own explanatory framework. If so, I do understand what you are saying. However you say, Quote-" non-causal consciousness in Total Simultaneity : has "contact", this is not the good expression, it is embedded in all available pasts and futures should be a better description".Which makes me wonder, how?; and why do you propose this? Does it overcome some kind of problem or fit particularly well with some facts?

        Your paragraph starting "The "observer" is its consciousness...does make perfect sense to me, as I am familiar with your concept of the subjective simultaneity sphere from last years essay.

        I do like that you have separated the observer, who sees, from the causal and non causal mind. Which I think is a useful thing to consider.Some of the FQXi lectures from the Time conference brought out how the mind controls the synchronization of data and the perception of when in time stimuli have occurred. It isn't just a passive receiver.I am thinking this might be what you mean by the causal mind. The non causal mind would then be the receiver and not involved in processing into an ordered experience.

        As you can see from all that I'm still a bit puzzled. Georgina

        Dear Georgina;

        About once perhaps being able to choose your history:

        Indeed it is not necessary to clean up the memory you have on the life-line you are now aware of, each life line has his own history and future , you just "jump" to another one with a "better" past, the one you were on is becoming one of the infinite availabilities. You can say that when this happens you will not be aware of this "improvement", that is true for the state of mind we have just now, there are I think however pasts and futures where mankind will have the possibility to make a choice , making a choice means also that you can compare life-lines, so the histories compared are becoming a part of your "real" awareness.

        These life-lines can be compared (because we have to make a causal comparison)with the lines on a cone , the NOW is the centre , a point with no dimensions, a non-causal singularity, a scale invariant entity that represents the "Eternal Now". This singularity can represent the absolute nothing or the infinite ALL, because it is not imprisoned in dimensions. ALL possible and impossible life lines are passing through, so at every Eternal Now moment consciousness (if it ware able to) has the possibility to choose which way to go or which way it went.

        In the life line that we are experiencing now, so only on the Eternal Now moment there is the possibility to change, in the history of your "present" life-line there are no such moments. However the Eternal Now moments are the RYTHM of reality, the Planck time.

        This is in concordance with my perception that behind the Planck length and time there is another dimensionless non causal indescribable universe which is the singularity that is both ALL and Nothing, Total Simultaneity.

        This thought is becoming now more accepted as the top-minds in theoretical physics and philosophy, among them Leonard Susskind posed the idea that in the center of a black hole there is not a material singularity but at the Planck length a wormhole that gives admittance to other universes. What I propose is that once you are passing the Planck length you enter Total Simultaneity, but not only in the centre of a black hole but at every point in our universe, so TS can be "reached" everywhere, the wormhole not only gives entrance to another space but also to pasts and futures.

        see for this NEW SCIENTIST of 27th july 2013 page 10 : The great Quantum Space-Time tangle.

        Our non-causal part of consciousness "resides" in TS, the Eternal Now, the dimensionless entity and is through entanglement connected with the causal part that is captured in dimensions.

        I hope this explains a little, I know it is difficult to grab, it is just one perception and I am still working on the complete OEUVRE.

        best regards, and do not hesitate to ask me if you have more questions, it is also me when I answer them that is learning.

        Wilhelmus

        Dear Wilhelmus,

        As I told you in my Essay page, I have read your pretty Essay. Here are my comments/questions.

        1) I find interesting your decomposing information as far as PB and PS and the duality between these "building blocks of reality" and the Block Universe.

        2) Why did you state that each Primal Sequence has the length of a Planck-time?

        3) In your statement "Our causal consciousness can be imagined as an emerged singularity from the total constitution of the materialistic created reality (Creality) of body and brain" has the word "singularity" the usual mathematical meaning?

        4) I like that the duality between possible states of a single qubit and Bloch Sphere is connected with the Holographic Principle.

        5) Although in your physical world there is more uncertainty than in quantum mechanics, you claim that "we may achieve a whole new form of "knowledge" that can become WISDOM". This looks a bit contradictory. Don't you think that there is also a potential negative alternative, a complete breakdown of causality that could generate a complete CHAOS?

        In any case, your Essay is beautiful and I enjoyed in reading it. Thus, I will give you a high rate.

        Cheers,

        Ch.

          Dear Christian,

          Thank you very much for your valued attention

          ref 2. I choose the Planck length because at that length there is longer before or after possible, you could regard it as the limit of causality, the same is done in string theory and Loop Quantum Gravity. However I am also aware that this can be only a limit that comes with the actual knowledge of physics. For example in Physorg.com (http://www.physorg.com/print/228653869) from 04/07/2011 is a report from ESA's Integral Gamma ray observatory, that the "graininess" may be 10^-48 instead of the 10^-33. This however does not "destroy" my perception because I think that for a real limit to reality and causality we will have to accept the fact "limit" wherever it may be.

          ref 3. A Singularity has no dimensions, it is dimensionless, this means that it is not imprisoned in waves or "matter", it is scale independent. Consciousness is not a wave nor has a material appearance you can imagine it also as dimensionless, the mathematical meaning can be applied but not ad-infinitum I think.

          ref 5. We are living in a complete chaos and trying to find our way through all kind of troubles and fighting entropy. The inborn duality of our present creality gives us love at one side and war at the other, we seek the right path in between like finding our way in the infinite amount of tones of grey that I mention in my essay. (the wave particle duality is not a duality but there are all kind of states in-between). The complete breakdown of causality has the possibility to enter a non-causal universe , freedom of time, dimensionless, so become a singularity that is because it is dimensionless both the absolute Zero and the absolute Everything, Total Simultaneity, where the non-causal consciousness "resides" (wrong word , but we have no expression for that state) and maybe is like GOD. (perhaps we can "experience" (again an expression of a state we cannot describe) this state when our causal consciousness is liberated from the dimensions). I am however optimistic about the future evolvement of consciousness, as humanity (that is just one tool for being conscious) is still very young and has hopefully a long way to go and become more and more able to straighten and understand the entanglement between its non-causal part of consciousness.

          I thank for the rating you gave me, it gave one of moments of happiness in the struggle for getting heard.

          best regards

          Wilhelmus

          thank you Satyavarapu for your extensive answer and your positive rating.

          I visited your website and you are really giving a message, although I may not be of the same opinion, I am always interested in different perceptions, it is ALL the colours together that constitute the rainbow.

          best regards

          Wilhelmus

          Hi Wilhelmus,

          thank you very much for your reply. Lots to think about.One puzzlement for now; If I hop to a different better life line does the former one erase itself from memory, (the neural systems allowing recall)?, how? Or is there awareness of the old and the new history? How does the new history that wasn't, but now is, write itself into memory? I can imagine such a thing being done artificially by implanting false memories but I can't imagine the natural process of change that accompanies the hop.

          Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde:

          I am an old physician and I don't know nothing of mathematics and almost nothing of physics. maybe you would be interested in my essay over a subject which after the common people, physic discipline is the one that uses more than any other, the so called "time".

          I am sending you a practical summary, so you can easy decide if you read or not my essay "The deep nature of reality".

          I am convince you would be interested in reading it. ( most people don't understand it, and is not just because of my bad English).

          Hawking in "A brief history of time" where he said , "Which is the nature of time?" yes he don't know what time is, and also continue saying............Some day this answer could seem to us "obvious", as much than that the earth rotate around the sun....." In fact the answer is "obvious", but how he could say that, if he didn't know what's time? In fact he is predicting that is going to be an answer, and that this one will be "obvious", I think that with this adjective, he is implying: simple and easy to understand. Maybe he felt it and couldn't explain it with words. We have anthropologic proves that man measure "time" since more than 30.000 years ago, much, much later came science, mathematics and physics that learn to measure "time" from primitive men, adopted the idea and the systems of measurement, but also acquired the incognita of the experimental "time" meaning. Out of common use physics is the science that needs and use more the measurement of what everybody calls "time" and the discipline came to believe it as their own. I always said that to understand the "time" experimental meaning there is not need to know mathematics or physics, as the "time" creators and users didn't. Instead of my opinion I would give Einstein's "Ideas and Opinions" pg. 354 "Space, time, and event, are free creations of human intelligence, tools of thought" he use to call them pre-scientific concepts from which mankind forgot its meanings, he never wrote a whole page about "time" he also use to evade the use of the word, in general relativity when he refer how gravitational force and speed affect "time", he does not use the word "time" instead he would say, speed and gravitational force slows clock movement or "motion", instead of saying that slows "time". FQXi member Andreas Albrecht said that. When asked the question, "What is time?", Einstein gave a pragmatic response: "Time," he said, "is what clocks measure and nothing more." He knew that "time" was a man creation, but he didn't know what man is measuring with the clock.

          I insist, that for "measuring motion" we should always and only use a unique: "constant" or "uniform" "motion" to measure "no constant motions" "which integrates and form part of every change and transformation in every physical thing. Why? because is the only kind of "motion" whose characteristics allow it, to be divided in equal parts as Egyptians and Sumerians did it, giving born to "motion fractions", which I call "motion units" as hours, minutes and seconds. "Motion" which is the real thing, was always hide behind time, and covert by its shadow, it was hide in front everybody eyes, during at least two millenniums at hand of almost everybody. Which is the difference in physics between using the so-called time or using "motion"?, time just has been used to measure the "duration" of different phenomena, why only for that? Because it was impossible for physicists to relate a mysterious time with the rest of the physical elements of known characteristics, without knowing what time is and which its physical characteristics were. On the other hand "motion" is not something mysterious, it is a quality or physical property of all things, and can be related with all of them, this is a huge difference especially for theoretical physics I believe. I as a physician with this find I was able to do quite a few things. I imagine a physicist with this can make marvelous things.

          With my best whishes

          Héctor

            Dear Dr Gianni,

            Thank you for your extensive and interesting post.

            I read your essay, and posted an answer there.

            best regards

            Wilhelmus

            Dear Wilhelmus,

            I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

            I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

            You can find the latest version of my essay here:

            http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

            (sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

            May the best essays win!

            Kind regards,

            Paul Borrill

            paul at borrill dot com

              dear Paul,

              The photon as a time carrier is quite a new and fascinating idea, my perception however is that also a photon is only ONE way to explain our reality through observation. The photon is both wave and "particle" and ALL in between these two extremities (I think). So it is one of the infinite possibilities to explain what we are experiencing as reality.

              The reversals as you indicate are "available" at every "moment" every "eternal now" that is at the cross-point of what we experience as the past and the future, the experienced past however is only one of an infinite amount of available pasts.

              best regards

              and hoping for your reply

              Wilhelmus

              4 days later

              Hi Wilhelmus,

              sorry if it is an awkward question. I'm popping by occasionally to see if there is a reply as I am interested in how it could work.

              I understand that for trauma victims, such as soldiers returning from active duty, revisiting past memories can allow rewriting of the events and responses.As memories are not fixed but plastic. The participant can come to feel in control being mentally back in that traumatic situation. It is thought to be therapeutic as long as it is not conducted too soon after the traumatic incident. It leads to present changes in brain structure and function, allowing recovery from post traumatic stress.

              Reliving and altering memories is not the same as swapping world line in your model though, or is it?

              Dear Georgina,

              First I am sorry that I did not reply to your post of august 1, it is because of the fact that in the morning it was there, and I always answer in the evening but then in the evening it was no longer there, I understand it had to do with the server and not me changing a life-line :-).

              Well it is my perception (point of view) that changing life-lines is a process that happens every Planck time. The past belonging to every new NOW (which is already in the past when you become aware of it, and that NOW being part of the Eternal NOW that is comparable with the block universe of that Planck moment)is also one of the infinite so called "pasts" (that we are aware of because of the causality and the dimensions that create the "CREALITY), belonging to a Creality of that specific causal time-life-line. The so called material entity that is your BODY is also a Creality of Consciousness to interpret the this life line in for our five senses comprehensible data.

              Your memory that is belonging to the MIND of that material (see dematerialisation part in my essay)is so a causal part of that specific causal life-line (at that moment you could call it the ZERO line because it is in the centre of causal consciousness and its Eternal Now.

              Your causal part of consciousness is like travelling around between a myrad of yourselves, and each change of line does not affect the old memory that will however being kept available in Total Simultaneity.

              Some people can sense other life-lines, see in the future and talk languages they never learned, this can be explained in this way of thinking.

              Humanity and its senses are just at the beginning of the development of their until now 5 senses, there is hope...

              Wilhelmus

              Thanks Wilhelmus,

              I think I have a better understanding of what you mean now. I will have to think about it some more though.

              2 months later