Essay Abstract

The present document starts from the relative existence of the electromagnetic field, reaching through mental experiments to its connection with the gravitational field, without the necessity to resort to other space - time dimensions or supplementary "exotic" particles. The final conclusion is that the field "electro-gravitational" and electromagnetic field with accelerated source are two different manifestations of the same single field dynamic. While demonstrating why there are light sources with "flee" towards the red or blue of the light spectrum and explain why we have accelerate expansion of the universe without the necessity of dark matter.

Author Bio

My name is Mavriche Adrian and my e-mail is mavricheadrian@gmail.com and I propose you a theory that seems simple, but with major implications in physics and does not contradict with any "standard theory" on the contrary, it is based on two standard theories ("General Theory of Relativity" and "Electromagnetic Field Theory"). I introduced and confirmation,which says that it's like expected my theory (see "Reference" headings 8, 9 -arXiv, 10).My theory "explain why we have accelerate expansion of the universe without the necessity of dark matter." (This dark matter with controversial properties - exert gravitational attraction, but (strangely) not interact

Download Essay PDF File

Mavriche,

Interesting mental experiments you have presented in your essay. You have touched upon findings that I have obtained which unify gravity with the electromagnetic field. However, the findings I have obtained go much further to unify gravity with the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces as one super-deterministc force. I invite you to rate my essay when you get the chance:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1809

Good luck with your entry of which I have rated highly for its originality.

Regards,

Manuel

Adrian, welcome to the contest. These are interesting thought experiments but it would be useful to explain more about how these relate to the topic of "It from Bit"

    Dear Hoang,

    I do not know what information you got, but please see the link.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_universe

    Adrian.

    Dear Philip,

    Yes. Please excuse me.I think I posted in the wrong place.

    Please change the posting, if you are able.

    Adrian

    Dear Adrian,

    Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon.

    So you can produce material from your thinking. . . .

    I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

    I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

    Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

    Best

    =snp

    snp.gupta@gmail.com

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

    Pdf download:

    http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

    Part of abstract:

    - -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

    Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

    A

    Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

    ....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

    Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

    . . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

    B.

    Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

    Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

    C

    Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

    "Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

    Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

    1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

    2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

    3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

    4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

    D

    Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

    It from bit - where are bit come from?

    Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

    ....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

    Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

    E

    Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

    .....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

    I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

    6 days later

    Mavriche,

    If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

    Jim

    22 days later

    Dear Adrian,

    I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

    Regards and good luck in the contest,

    Sreenath BN.

    http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

    Dear Mavriche,

    The theme behind your essay aroused my interest because I am too, like you, working on the theory of quantum-gravity (QG) by combining both gravitational and electro-magnetic fields. In fact in the previous essay contest of fqxi (2012), I dealt with the same subject and you can see there my paper. The two fields you are talking of, namely, electro-gravitational and electromagnetic field with accelerated source, as you have rightly pointed out, are two manifestations of the same field called the QG field. I appreciate your idea of bringing both fields on the same platform through your imaginative thinking made me wonder about the psychic abilities you possess. Your idea of explaining 'the acceleration expansion of the universe' without the necessity of dark matter is really worth considering. You have clearly given the unification formula as "gravitational field electric field = electromagnetic field with the accelerated source" and expressed it as U.T.E.F.G. When you say that "When introducing an electric field in a gravitational field (acceleration field), an electromagnetic field with accelerated source always appears, or, There is no method to distinguish between an electric field combined with a gravitational field (electro-gravitational field) and an electromagnetic field with accelerated source" it is simply revelation of your dream of combining both fields. This is also reminiscent of Einstein's thoughts on his theories of relativity. The figures you have displayed help one in understanding your ideas behind them. So for all these reasons and also because of similarities to my thoughts with that of yours, I have given you maximum possible rating. Please go through my essay also (http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827) and express your comments on it in my thread.

    I look forward to hear from you in the earnest and all the best.

    Sreenath

    8 days later

    Dear Adrian,

    We are at the end of this essay contest.

    In conclusion, at the question to know if Information is more fundamental than Matter, there is a good reason to answer that Matter is made of an amazing mixture of eInfo and eEnergy, at the same time.

    Matter is thus eInfo made with eEnergy rather than answer it is made with eEnergy and eInfo ; because eInfo is eEnergy, and the one does not go without the other one.

    eEnergy and eInfo are the two basic Principles of the eUniverse. Nothing can exist if it is not eEnergy, and any object is eInfo, and therefore eEnergy.

    And consequently our eReality is eInfo made with eEnergy. And the final verdict is : eReality is virtual, and virtuality is our fundamental eReality.

    Good luck to the winners,

    And see you soon, with good news on this topic, and the Theory of Everything.

    Amazigh H.

    I rated your essay.

    Please visit My essay.

    Dear Mavriche,

    I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

    I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

    You can find the latest version of my essay here:

    http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

    (sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

    May the best essays win!

    Kind regards,

    Paul Borrill

    paul at borrill dot com

    Write a Reply...