Essay Abstract

The universe has always been a mystery to the human mind,It has proven to be a multi-faceted enterprise diverse as what it embodies.The Cosmological universe also has its basis too in philosophy,information on the universe is sought in modern ways using the physical theory.The universe displays reality at the deepest level.A Physical universe must also exist in maths,of which the fundamentals are digits/numbers.The universe is herein taken as a physical computer,I reveal The fundamentals that are most likely to make M-theory work-Using it to define the computational parameters that make the universe qualify to be a supercomputer easily capable of Quantum Computing. I take a historical walk from the past to the present displaying the mans quest for Truth about the universe and eventually reality.

Author Bio

aged only 25 years,living in Nyeri,Kenya.I study Superstring theory at home and currently working on formulating the complete M-theory in a simple understandable manner.i generally publish my findings on viXra the open e-print journal in Quantum gravity and string theory.I farm during my free time.

Download Essay PDF File

Hello Michael,

I'm curious about your closing statement around Black Holes. I too think they are key to information and reality, plus the fact they are centered on a size-less point makes them all the more fascinating. Hopefully our essays have common ground to discuss these foundational questions further?

Best wishes,

Antony

    Mr. muteru,

    I found reading your very well crafted essay absorbing.

    As an old feeble realist, will you allow me to make a comment about it?

    You wrote, "Our universe is just a mirror truth written in just 3 Dimensions." But right after that sentence came the heading, "Uniqueness and Appeal." You never subsequently mentioned what you thought was appealing about uniqueness.

    In my essay Bitters, I have stressed the fact that one real unique Universe can only be eternally occurring in one real here and now travelling in one real infinite dimension, once. Could you please explain your idea of unique?

    Incidentally, I think that the reason a perpetual motion machine cannot be built is because everything in the real Universe is already perpetually traveling at the default "speed" of light.

    Joe

      Michael,

      What did pi have to do with the universe? Interesting closure to a very insightful essay. I appreciated your inquiry and analysis of this very involved topic and have rated your essay accordingly.

      When you get the chance, I hope you will take the time to review and rate my essay. I believe you will find it provocative and relevant to your efforts:

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1809

      Good luck with your entry.

      Regards,

      Manuel

      Hello Michael,

      I love your inquiring mind. But do not get carried away with 11-dimensions, strings, etc. I would advise you stick with the usual 3-dimensions, like I do in my essay, where I also touch on geometry like you also tried to do.

      Best of luck,

      Akinbo

        Dear Michael,

        Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon. Can the information in any computer produce material?

        I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

        I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

        Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

        Best

        =snp

        snp.gupta@gmail.com

        http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

        Pdf download:

        http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

        Part of abstract:

        - -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

        Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

        A

        Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

        ....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

        Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

        . . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

        B.

        Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

        Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

        C

        Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

        "Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

        Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

        1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

        2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

        3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

        4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

        D

        Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

        It from bit - where are bit come from?

        Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

        ....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

        Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

        E

        Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

        .....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

        I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

          Joe, I agree that everything is perpetually travelling at the speed of light. Even particles of mass propagate their gravity at c.

          Great point - well made.

          4 days later

          The universe is complex simplicity,simplicity at the most complex scales while at the same time complexity at the simplest scales.Thanks alot for all who have rated my essay ITS FROM BITS, BITS FROM IT- NATURE THE UNIVERSE AND M-THEORY-The physical theory as a source of information.

          I greatly appreciate your kind words,Live quite far away from an internet cafe.Must surely take the time to read and rate your essays soonest.I appreciate you alot,sorry today the connections is quite slow.Thanks in advance

          Hi Anthony,thanks for your review,have also looked through yours its a nice read.just rated it.information in itself is so wide a subject.using physics to describe it is much easier.I propose that information too follows the fundamental law of energy.that is energy cannot be created or destroyed but can only be transformed into one form or another.

          hello joe

          Thanks alot for the encouraging review,the notion of building anything in the universe including the universe itself is a sheer violation of a fundamental rule -that of energy.If the universe can be expressed physically in terms of matter and energy then too this holds.I work mainly on M-theory the top-down approach,maybe you can observe how the story unfolds via this link http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/paralleluni.shtml.With superconductivity i meant matter that makes up the cosmological constant -Cold Dark matter/dark energy .The photon is placed in this as the background on its worldsheet Thank you. hope you vote and rate my essay too

          hi Akinbo.I HAVE RATED YOUR ESSAY ACCORDINGLY.To have the best view of the valley climb a hill.To have the best view of the hill go down into the valley.I reckon sticking to the three dimensions would be a serious mistake,putting all your eggs in one basket.M-theory has been around since 1995,string theory since the 60 s.Bosonic string theorists conjured the quarks,hadron theories,in fact string theory then aided to a great extent in discovery of new particles due to its immense predictive power.M-theory has been a long story but not only a true one but real .watch http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/paralleluni.shtml .fora bit of the insight.hope you continue the discourse.All the best thanks

          thanks Gupta i reckon that the quest for reality is not for the easy hearted,New paths have to be crafted with forever unwavering eagerness.The theory called M-theory is largely ignored,yet its the pet subject of the best minds around,i propose you read from the superstring theory website www.superstringtheory.com,or watch these videos http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/paralleluni.shtml.

          I think that reality is singular.See how, many eventually met as one.Thanks in advance.Kindly take your time to vote /rate my essay .

          Hallo Cao

          thanks for your inquisitive mind its only a matter of time.With M- theory .it is only a matter of time.String theory largely worked in development of QCD,QED theories later proved in [particle colliders in the 80s to even the Higgs Boson.String theory was once described as 21st century physics that fallen by chance into 20th century physics.With the advencement in technology.the entire enterprise will be so easy to prove.for a bit of insight into the long story watch http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/paralleluni.shtml.hope you take a bit of your precious time to rate my essay thanks.

          kindly take a bit of your precious time to review/vote my essy

          7 days later

          Michael,

          Thanks for a very enjoyable and interesting read. You wrote a lovely review running smoothly into your thesis. I found your writing style excellent, and gained a fascinating fresh viewpoint on M-theory.

          I'm not so dismissive of additional dimensions as many, in fact I've chanced across an insight into additional dimensions from my own work, ostensibly nothing to do with strings but seemingly consistent with early Kaluza conceptions. In my case they'd be higher order or smaller 'sample spaces', re-occurring fractally. I agree we should address 0, and indeed look at the whole complex distribution between 0 and 1. I'd greatly appreciate your own thoughts on whether there could be any analogy.

          I think your score and place are entirely inappropriate and am happy to aid them. I also need good scores so I hope you also like mine. Very well done, and best wishes.

          Peter

          12 days later

          Dear Michael,

          I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments. Like you I too used to do farming but not now.

          Regards and good luck in the contest,

          Sreenath BN.

          http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

          Dear Michael

          I didn't know of HD 140283, and went looking. It seems that it does not actually conflict with the age of the universe, but one wonders: if this star is so close, there must be a very great number of others in the universe. Fascinating! Consequently, I'm sure there will be others that push the bounds of the age of the universe out there.

          I liked your consideration of strings, and our fear of zero. It was an interesting read. I admire your determination to work in this area, especially given the need to fit it into such a radically different life background.

          Good luck

          Stephen Anastasi

          Dear Michael,

          You have written a highly imaginative essay in which you have thought the whole universe itself as a huge super computer capable of Quantum Computing. For this you have made use of the mathematics of M string theory. This is a highly complicated task and you have succeeded in doing it. I hope, you continue your work on this and improve up on it. For this work of yours I am going to give you maximum possible rating.

          Best regards,

          Sreenath