Dear Sir,
You description of "Inorganic, Organic, and Sensory-Cognitive realms", reminds us of the ancient treatise "Kanaada Sootras", which describes these as "Vishaya" - meaning "object", "Sharira" or body, and "Indriya" or instruments of sensory perception respectively. This, he applies to each (5) type of perception. Unfortunately, it is very precise and its detailed commentaries by Atri and Ravan that explained the science are lost. We will describe our understanding of those.
In the mechanism of perception, each sense organ perceives different kind of impulses related to the fundamental forces of Nature. Eyes see form by measuring (comparing) the electromagnetic field set up by the object with that of the electrons in our cornea, which is the unit. Thus, we cannot see in total darkness because there is nothing comparable to this unit. Tongue perceives the chemical composition when the object is dissolved in the mouth, which is macro equivalent of the weak nuclear interaction that leads to changing chemistry. Nose perceives the distinguishing characteristics of the mass of the object, when the finer parts of an object are brought in close contact with the smell buds, which is macro equivalent of the strong nuclear interaction. Skin perceives heat and cold when they are in motion leaving the body that is macro equivalent of the radioactive disintegration. Ears hear sound waves that come near or recede from us or stay at a fixed distance (all signifying the relation between two bodies) that is macro equivalent of the gravitational interaction (see our comment in our thread).
Individually the perception has no meaning. For example, what we see is the radiation emanating from out of the body and not the body proper. What we touch is the state of the mass that emits radiation and not the radiation it emits. Since eyes cannot touch or hand cannot see, individually they cannot describe the body fully. They become information and acquire meaning only when they are pooled and stable in our memory. In the lower animals, all the sense organs are not fully developed. Hence their capacity to function in tandem is limited. Thus, they only respond to situations based on memory. In human beings, the sense organs are fully developed. Hence they not only respond to situations, but also plan future strategies. This is the difference between them.
Since all these sensory perceptions are nothing but measurement of the objects in space in time, they are not ghostly, but real. Measurement implies the existence of the Conscious Agent who does the measurement of an object in space in time using an apparatus (of sensory perception). The result of measurement is information about the "physical Cosmos of Atoms and organic matter" stored for future use. Thus, they are related. All perceptions require energy to reveal the object and take the reading. In fact, energy connects both. But information or perception is not energy, but stored stable data.
The Cosmos appears to be a single field for two reasons: First, as the background structure (a General Field of Cosmae), it is common to all. Secondly, perception of information is common to all. The content of all perceptions is: "I know.....". This part is common in all perceptions, though the object of perception change. Without this commonality, there cannot be communication. What we express must be understood by others exactly as the same. The gaps are not in the field, but in the non-linear distribution of mass and energy that seem to violate the integrity of the common description (density) and not that of the single field.
We hold that mind (Information-Assumption), which is also an instrument of perception, functions mechanically and thought is the inertia of mind. Once we receive an external impulse, our mind compares it with all stored similar or related impulses due to inertia that we call as the train of thought. Like inertia of motion is destroyed due to air friction, gravitational attraction or impact with other bodies, thought is destroyed by evaluating the impulse with all stored memory (knowing whatever is possible), getting the object of desire or pain that distracts our attention.
The states of matter are described by their dimension, which differentiate the "internal structural space" - bare mass, from the "external relational space" - the radiative mass. It is perceived through electromagnetic radiation (ocular perception), where an electric field and a magnetic field, move perpendicular to each other and also to the direction of their motion. Thus, we have three mutually perpendicular dimensions. For this reason, we classify the states of matter as solid, fluid or gaseous, depending upon whether the dimension is fixed, unfixed but bound or unbound. Plasma belongs to a different state altogether.
The curvature of Cosmos can be viewed in two ways: As we have explained, equilibrium of a body ends and motion begins when one of the forces stabilizing it is overpowered or removed. This application or removal of force has a direction. On motion, the body interacts with the field or other bodies and its inertia of motion gets affected making it behave like a projective tracing out a curved path. Reaction of the field to this curved path creates a bow-shock effect, creating a wave pattern. Thus, all bodies or energy flows move in wave like trajectories. Since the space, which provides the background structure, is interval between bodies, it can not be described as a physical object perceived through our sense organs. Thus, we use alternative symbolism to describe it by the curvature of the objects. Thus, instead of Principal Vortices, it will be better to state the Inorganic, Organic, and Sensory-Cognitive realms as representing the tripod of the Cosmos.
Your concept of gravito-magnetic force is very important. Black holes, which are macro examples of neutrons in atoms, are more a magnetic phenomenon than a gravitational phenomenon. Thus, we find the strongest magnetic fields at neutron stars and black holes. Protons are macro equivalents of Jupiter like planets. We have shown their similarities elsewhere. Just like n-p cycle creates the energy that binds the atom, the interaction of mini black-holes and big Jupiter like planets flare up as stars and galaxies. The resultant force acts upon the system as a whole. We hold that unless the five fundamental forces of Nature (including radioactive disintegration) are present, no structure would be stable. Earlier, we have shown how the five forces are different representations of the same force. Hence, you views are correct.
Regards,
basudeba