Dear Paul,
Thanks for the comment on my essay. Yes with in the range of our digital (or more precisely quantize) range/limitation of observation time should be quantized and inseparable to non-void space.
In the essay it has tried to propose that every particles including universe in nature (IT) as a whole have two simultaneous mirror imaged parts (BITs) and they are inseparable. If anyway it is tried to make some change in one part of such particle, then simultaneously it's mirror part will go through an instantaneous change. For that, no EPR/entanglement like signalling would be needed to exchane in between, and that is not the question of a signal exchange in between two entangled particles.
Actually, we can logically define through the essay that one can not separate any two entangled particles from each other in both of their space and anti-space. Two such entangled particles could be separated in their respective quantize space and time, but simultaneously both will come closure and closure in their respective but inverse (or mirror imaged) and equally quantized anti-space and anti-time.
I think that EPR or entanglement concept is a very limited view about the particles (or systems), through that process one is not perceiving the whole black and white canvas instead is viewing only either its black or its white part.
Moreover, if time is intrinsically quantize with different scales of particle systems (that's in my essay) and since larger systems (with respective magnitude of quantize time)are always comprised by corresponding smaller sub-particles (with their respective other quantize magnitude of time), then obviously there should be always "subtime", subspace, submass-energy and so on in every larger particle systems in the nature. I am absolutely agree with such concept of 'subtime'.
Regards
Dipak