Essay Abstract

Most religious cosmologies consider the Universe static and eternal, while Gods were embedded and acted on it, in order to make the world we live in. Cosmology is considered as a science only recently and bears notions of cosmological myths; like the universe came out of nothing. New physics, new tools and new experiments are needed in order to study this preexisting nothingness and answer what happened before Big Bang. Multiverse is the most favorite explanation among physicists. That is isolated regions in an inflationary background. These regions evolve and give rise to universes with their own parameters. The mechanism that creates each island universe remains unknown.

Author Bio

Electrical Engineer of National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) , Master in Energy Technology of Ecole Polythecnique Federal de Lausanne (EPFL), Cybernetic research (Brunel University ,London UK). Diploma in Physics of National & Kapodistrian University of Athens. PhD student in Physics. Physics research.

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Grispos

Thank you for presenting a nice essay. You are correct , static universe is not the solution. And we are not able to solve the problems and observations in one universe, why are you proposing a "multiverse"?

........

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

.....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

Mr. Grispos,

Your essay was utterly absorbing. It was beautifully constructed, and the writing was exceptionally masterfully executed.

I am a decrepit old realist. The real Universe is not complex. As I have pointed out in my essay BITTERS, the real Universe is unique, once.

Let us Wheeler our two conflicting views of the Universe.

Is one real unique Universe simple? Yes

Is abstract universe complex? Yes

Why is abstract universe complex? It is not unique, once. A real light, once, is a real light, once, is a real light, once. It is not made up of untold invisible numbers of identical abstract photons that might be abstractly identically placed besides each other and may identically rest upon each other "all the way down."

Did you not notice as you were writing it, that all of the complexity you mentioned was man-made?

9 days later

Basileios,

The theme for this round of essays is broad and your essay is even broader. I like how you span from the bible to quantum mechanics. You have a nice survey of science history and show how in the past has been very right and very wrong. I had trouble finding your overall theme or thesis. You seem to show that the universe is very complex and we are just starting to understand it. If "the universe is complex at many levels" is what you are telling us, I agree.

Hope you do well,

Jeff

Basileios,

What a jewel of an essay! On one hand I am confounded as to why it has not been rated higher, yet on the other, I can understand if others who have only scanned your abstract and saw the 'GOD' word most likely would have continued on... I am glad to not have been so quick to form an opinion.

On that note, I would like to ask you some questions via email and was wondering if you would be kind enough to provide your email address or just send an email to me at: msm@physicsofdestiny.com

I look forward to hearing from you.

Manuel

9 days later

Dear Basileios,

just to let you know I have read through your essay. I like the informative history at the beginning but agree with Manuel that it may have deterred others from reading to the end where the essay becomes more physics oriented. The 'bit of a story' was a surprise and maintained my interest in reading further as I did not know what to expect next. Its an interesting collection of diverse ideas that I have enjoyed dipping into. Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Regards Georgina

12 days later

Dear Basileios,

I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

You can find the latest version of my essay here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

May the best essays win!

Kind regards,

Paul Borrill

paul at borrill dot com