Dear Jayakar,

Thank you for an Very good essay. The information continuum is a nice introduction.

So you think that matter can be formed just by bits of information from nothing...?

Mean while.....

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

.....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

    Thank you dear Gupta,

    In particle scenario, information is energy transfer; whereas in string-matter continuum of eternal universe, information is the transfer of string-matter segment with its rotational energy.

    As the observational information by bit unit of information is probabilistic rather than realistic, the observational information of experimentations itself is probabilistic and not realistic.

    With best wishes

    Jayakar

    Thank you dear Hai,

    In a set of multiple Relational questions, the absoluteness of answers for each question element is within interval limits of an integral that maps in continuum with another. Thus unitarity rather than quantization is more pragmatic with information continuum, whereas quantisation is imperative to measure information.

    In this aspect, 'It from Bit or Bit from It?' is Relational questions, in that the absoluteness of answers for both questions, are true within the interval limits of the integrals indicating the answer in entirety is also true, that is '1' in binary.

    With best wishes, Jayakar

    Hello Jayakar,

    A very important essay, the direction of research and conclusion: «Information continuum is not observational exclusively with bit contraction of base-2 Binary numeral system and thus Ternary numeral system to be inclusive of defining an information unit on quantizing the incident time in probability density matrices for the detection of information in near reality. Thus it is concluded that string-matter continuum is imperative for the information continuum to observe the realistic information of nature and to resolve the paradoxes in particle scenario. This indicates a profound inconsistency that exists between Information science and Information technology. »

    I think that our essays are very close on the philosophical grounds and areas of research. In addition, You know all the intricacies of physics and mathematics. I continue to read your other research. Good luck and best wishes, Vladimir

      Thank you dear Vladimir for your kind appreciation.

      With best regards and wishes,

      Jayakar

      Dear Dr. Jayakar

      I read with great interest your essay and looked at your research website. Your work reveals an original and well developed way of thinking about the fundamentals of physics. You propose tetrahedral units of electromagnetic energy and the way they interact is by the rotation of these units. As such I agree with you because my own Beautiful Universe Theory also found here posits that everything is made up of dielectric lattice of nodes transmitting rotational energy, that is, angular momentum. These nodes are arranged in a Face-Centered Cubic arrangement like a crystal so that tetrahedral arrangements are embedded naturally within the system. fqxi contributors and others also proposed tetrahedral building blocks, but not in the way you have done.

      You are more knowledgeable than me about particle physics, Feynman diagrams, etc. and I have no doubt that within the logic of your theory you are right. What I find a bit confusing is that you express your original ideas with the vocabulary of the 'other' physics - strings, probability, etc. This gives them some credibility but does not add to their understanding. I wish I able to comment on the many technical points your theory raises, but your ideas are certainly an original way to answer the It Bit question. I wish you the best of luck.

      Vladimir

      Thank you Dear Vladimir,

      I have gone through your article describing your discovery of BU theory. I think your work is on Space charge continuum in that you have defined building blocks for the universe. In that the concept of 'node' ascribed in your theory is well descriptive with eigen-rotational string-matter segments, in that the dynamics of the junction of two segments may represent the formation of a virtual node. If you are interested we shall have regular interactions to integrate both works, in that I think we may emerge with solutions for the unification of fundamental forces, in particularly gravity with electromagnetism.

      With best wishes

      Jayakar

        7 days later

        Dear Jayakar,

        Very interesting essay. It seems to me as part of a larger research program. I agree with many parts of what you said, in particular with the idea that "Information continuum that is observational in particle scenario is only a probabilistic detection rather than observational information continuum that is realistic". I wish you good luck with this contest, your research, and the experiment concerning the string nature of partons.

        Best regards,

        Cristi

          Dear Jayakar

          Thank you for your interesting comments about BU theory and your kind offer. This theory emerged from research starting decades ago and I wrote it in 2005 - and over the decades I have developed an opus operandi of working on very small sections of the theory at a time. I am honored by your offer to integrate our works, but I think that will be difficult for me with my small capacity for learning new things (at my age) and the need to drastically adapt my theory to your well-developed system. I sincerely wish you the best of luck.

          BTW if you did not rate my essay The Cloud of Unknowing please consider doing so.

          Vladimir

          Hello Jayakar,

          Nice essay with new insights. From your essay, does it mean existence/non-existence is a binary information? If you think so, check my essay and rate if it is okay.

          Best regards,

          Akinbo

            Thank you dear Akinbo,

            Information in particle scenario is the transfer of energy, whereas in string-matter continuum it is transfer of matter with energy. Binary is the abstraction to define unit of information in that there is mathematical constrains on observations. Without existence there is no non-existence and thus the continuum in infinity is the existence.

            I shall go through your essay and express my perceptions soon.

            With best regards,

            Jayakar

            Dear Jayakar,

            I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

            Regards and good luck in the contest,

            Sreenath BN.

            http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

              Hi Jayakar,

              As promised in my Essay page, I have read your Essay. I think it is beautiful and a bit provocative. On the other hand, I appreciate people who "thinks outside the box". In particular, I find extremely important your statement "Information continuum that is observational in particle scenario is only a probabilistic detection rather than observational information continuum that is realistic". As I wrote in my Essay page in reply to your comments, I agree with you on the issue that in particle scenario the observational information is not observational in continuum is exactly the core of the information paradox. In my opinion your statement is completely in agreement with the famous aphorism by Einstein that you cited: "God does not play dice with the Universe". In other words, I agree with you deterministic vision of the Universe. I also took a look to your research website, I encourage you to further go on with your research fields. In general, your Essay gave me lots of fun. Thus, I will give you an high score.

              Cheers,

              Ch.

                Thank you, dear Corda for your kind encouragement.

                With best regards

                Jayakar

                Thank you, dear Sreenath,

                I shall go through your essay and submit my perceptions on that, soon.

                With best regards

                Jayakar

                Dear Jayakar,

                I like your essay and it seems our work may overlap. I've formulated a geometric theory which partly unifies the four forces and resolves the three paradoxes of cosmogony. It relates the masses of the proton, neutron and electron to 99.999988% of theory and the results improve with more data out of Cern.

                The theory is based on simplex geometry and I noticed your tetrahedral branes - so looks compatible!

                My essay her doesn't explain my ToE geometry, except it also utilises simplex geometry to explain entropy around Black Holes, the arrow of time and results in Fibonacci sequence.

                I hope we can exchange ideas in the future?

                Best wishes for the contest and congratulations on an excellent essay - I rate it highly!

                Antony

                  Dear Jayakar,

                  Thanks for your response to my posting in your thread. I have downloaded your essay and post my comments on it shortly in your thread.

                  Best wishes,

                  Sreenath

                  Thank you dear Antony,

                  I am much interested with simplex geometry on restructuring the atomic analogy and building up molecular modelling in this scenario. Surely I shall go through your essay and shall have discussions with you soon.

                  With best regards,

                  Jayakar