Dear Jayakar

Thank you for your interesting comments about BU theory and your kind offer. This theory emerged from research starting decades ago and I wrote it in 2005 - and over the decades I have developed an opus operandi of working on very small sections of the theory at a time. I am honored by your offer to integrate our works, but I think that will be difficult for me with my small capacity for learning new things (at my age) and the need to drastically adapt my theory to your well-developed system. I sincerely wish you the best of luck.

BTW if you did not rate my essay The Cloud of Unknowing please consider doing so.

Vladimir

Hello Jayakar,

Nice essay with new insights. From your essay, does it mean existence/non-existence is a binary information? If you think so, check my essay and rate if it is okay.

Best regards,

Akinbo

    Thank you dear Akinbo,

    Information in particle scenario is the transfer of energy, whereas in string-matter continuum it is transfer of matter with energy. Binary is the abstraction to define unit of information in that there is mathematical constrains on observations. Without existence there is no non-existence and thus the continuum in infinity is the existence.

    I shall go through your essay and express my perceptions soon.

    With best regards,

    Jayakar

    Dear Jayakar,

    I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

    Regards and good luck in the contest,

    Sreenath BN.

    http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

      Hi Jayakar,

      As promised in my Essay page, I have read your Essay. I think it is beautiful and a bit provocative. On the other hand, I appreciate people who "thinks outside the box". In particular, I find extremely important your statement "Information continuum that is observational in particle scenario is only a probabilistic detection rather than observational information continuum that is realistic". As I wrote in my Essay page in reply to your comments, I agree with you on the issue that in particle scenario the observational information is not observational in continuum is exactly the core of the information paradox. In my opinion your statement is completely in agreement with the famous aphorism by Einstein that you cited: "God does not play dice with the Universe". In other words, I agree with you deterministic vision of the Universe. I also took a look to your research website, I encourage you to further go on with your research fields. In general, your Essay gave me lots of fun. Thus, I will give you an high score.

      Cheers,

      Ch.

        Thank you, dear Corda for your kind encouragement.

        With best regards

        Jayakar

        Thank you, dear Sreenath,

        I shall go through your essay and submit my perceptions on that, soon.

        With best regards

        Jayakar

        Dear Jayakar,

        I like your essay and it seems our work may overlap. I've formulated a geometric theory which partly unifies the four forces and resolves the three paradoxes of cosmogony. It relates the masses of the proton, neutron and electron to 99.999988% of theory and the results improve with more data out of Cern.

        The theory is based on simplex geometry and I noticed your tetrahedral branes - so looks compatible!

        My essay her doesn't explain my ToE geometry, except it also utilises simplex geometry to explain entropy around Black Holes, the arrow of time and results in Fibonacci sequence.

        I hope we can exchange ideas in the future?

        Best wishes for the contest and congratulations on an excellent essay - I rate it highly!

        Antony

          Dear Jayakar,

          Thanks for your response to my posting in your thread. I have downloaded your essay and post my comments on it shortly in your thread.

          Best wishes,

          Sreenath

          Thank you dear Antony,

          I am much interested with simplex geometry on restructuring the atomic analogy and building up molecular modelling in this scenario. Surely I shall go through your essay and shall have discussions with you soon.

          With best regards,

          Jayakar

          Thank you Jayakar

          For your nice writing. You are correct in the particle scenario. "Information is energy transfer ...... observational information by bit unit of information is probabilistic rather than realistic, the observational information of experimentations.... "

          Best

          =snp

          Dear Sreenath,

          Hope you might have seen my perceptions on your essay.

          With best regards,

          Jayakar

          Dear Jayakar,

          Your treatment of the concept of 'information' is highly innovative and since it is based on string theory it is highly technical from the point of view of general audience. But I commend your effort to solve the problem of information paradox on the basis of string theory's mathematics and you have treated it from different perspectives like Language and Numerical systems, Feynman diagrams and string-matter continuum scenario. In Particle scenario Vs String-matter continuum, you have clearly distinguished how the information is transferred in them; it is being discrete in particle scenario and in String-matter continuum the information transfer from source to the observer is by spiral rotations of string-segment. Here I am curious to know, spiral rotations represent which spiral, is it log spiral or Archimedean spiral or some other spiral, because according to my theory of QG the spiral described in QG field is log spiral. So can you, please, clarify this point to me? In fact in the previous fqxi essay contest (2012), my subject was QG. Ultimately, in the contest between It and Bit you have naturally sided with Bit as it is to be expected. Thank you for writing a highly articulate article and I appreciate the effort you have put behind it. For this I am going to rate your essay highly.

          Best of luck,

          Sreenath

          Thank you dear Sreenath,

          I have gone through your essay on 2012 again and refreshed my perceptions with your work on QG with Torsion tensor in log-spiral.

          In string-matter continuum the spring constant on wave-front is inversely proportional to the Torsion tensor of the receding string and thus the gravitation between the observer and the source is a measurable function in space. Thus your work may be well integrated on this to quantize gravity in this scenario. Hence I seek long term collaborations with you for further developments on this.

          With best wishes,

          Jayakar

            Thank you Dear Vladimir,

            I think I have to be more elaborative on the integration aspect that I have perceived on your work. Anyhow I may contact you latter to exchange our ideas.

            With best regards,

            Jayakar

            Dear Jayakar,

            Thanks for your comments over on my page. I am keen to explain more, as I think we can find good overlap. I've left a reply, but will elaborate early in the coming week.

            Best wishes and thanks for presenting your interesting work,

            Antony

            Dear Jayakar,

            I want to have long time collaborations with you regarding this. When ever you are free try to contact me to develop this view further.

            Thank you dear Sreenath,

            We will have discussions after some time, on this view.

            With best regards,

            Jayakar

            Dr. Jayakar,

            I thought that your essay was exceptionally well written. I do hope that you do not think me impertinent. I am a crusty old realist and as I have carefully explained in my essay BITTERS, everything in the real Universe is unique, once.

            As you know, each snowflake is unique, once, and that means that each real molecule of each real snowflake must be unique, once. The whole real Universe is unique, once.

            Which brings me to the consideration of your essay's graphics. They are not unique. They are computer generated perfect squares and perfect circle and perfect yellow lightning bolts and while they are pretty to look at, they are unusual, unrealistic, and unnecessary for explaining reality.

            I wish you well in the competition,

            Joe