Hi Jayakar,

As promised in my Essay page, I have read your Essay. I think it is beautiful and a bit provocative. On the other hand, I appreciate people who "thinks outside the box". In particular, I find extremely important your statement "Information continuum that is observational in particle scenario is only a probabilistic detection rather than observational information continuum that is realistic". As I wrote in my Essay page in reply to your comments, I agree with you on the issue that in particle scenario the observational information is not observational in continuum is exactly the core of the information paradox. In my opinion your statement is completely in agreement with the famous aphorism by Einstein that you cited: "God does not play dice with the Universe". In other words, I agree with you deterministic vision of the Universe. I also took a look to your research website, I encourage you to further go on with your research fields. In general, your Essay gave me lots of fun. Thus, I will give you an high score.

Cheers,

Ch.

    Thank you, dear Corda for your kind encouragement.

    With best regards

    Jayakar

    Thank you, dear Sreenath,

    I shall go through your essay and submit my perceptions on that, soon.

    With best regards

    Jayakar

    Dear Jayakar,

    I like your essay and it seems our work may overlap. I've formulated a geometric theory which partly unifies the four forces and resolves the three paradoxes of cosmogony. It relates the masses of the proton, neutron and electron to 99.999988% of theory and the results improve with more data out of Cern.

    The theory is based on simplex geometry and I noticed your tetrahedral branes - so looks compatible!

    My essay her doesn't explain my ToE geometry, except it also utilises simplex geometry to explain entropy around Black Holes, the arrow of time and results in Fibonacci sequence.

    I hope we can exchange ideas in the future?

    Best wishes for the contest and congratulations on an excellent essay - I rate it highly!

    Antony

      Dear Jayakar,

      Thanks for your response to my posting in your thread. I have downloaded your essay and post my comments on it shortly in your thread.

      Best wishes,

      Sreenath

      Thank you dear Antony,

      I am much interested with simplex geometry on restructuring the atomic analogy and building up molecular modelling in this scenario. Surely I shall go through your essay and shall have discussions with you soon.

      With best regards,

      Jayakar

      Thank you Jayakar

      For your nice writing. You are correct in the particle scenario. "Information is energy transfer ...... observational information by bit unit of information is probabilistic rather than realistic, the observational information of experimentations.... "

      Best

      =snp

      Dear Sreenath,

      Hope you might have seen my perceptions on your essay.

      With best regards,

      Jayakar

      Dear Jayakar,

      Your treatment of the concept of 'information' is highly innovative and since it is based on string theory it is highly technical from the point of view of general audience. But I commend your effort to solve the problem of information paradox on the basis of string theory's mathematics and you have treated it from different perspectives like Language and Numerical systems, Feynman diagrams and string-matter continuum scenario. In Particle scenario Vs String-matter continuum, you have clearly distinguished how the information is transferred in them; it is being discrete in particle scenario and in String-matter continuum the information transfer from source to the observer is by spiral rotations of string-segment. Here I am curious to know, spiral rotations represent which spiral, is it log spiral or Archimedean spiral or some other spiral, because according to my theory of QG the spiral described in QG field is log spiral. So can you, please, clarify this point to me? In fact in the previous fqxi essay contest (2012), my subject was QG. Ultimately, in the contest between It and Bit you have naturally sided with Bit as it is to be expected. Thank you for writing a highly articulate article and I appreciate the effort you have put behind it. For this I am going to rate your essay highly.

      Best of luck,

      Sreenath

      Thank you dear Sreenath,

      I have gone through your essay on 2012 again and refreshed my perceptions with your work on QG with Torsion tensor in log-spiral.

      In string-matter continuum the spring constant on wave-front is inversely proportional to the Torsion tensor of the receding string and thus the gravitation between the observer and the source is a measurable function in space. Thus your work may be well integrated on this to quantize gravity in this scenario. Hence I seek long term collaborations with you for further developments on this.

      With best wishes,

      Jayakar

        Thank you Dear Vladimir,

        I think I have to be more elaborative on the integration aspect that I have perceived on your work. Anyhow I may contact you latter to exchange our ideas.

        With best regards,

        Jayakar

        Dear Jayakar,

        Thanks for your comments over on my page. I am keen to explain more, as I think we can find good overlap. I've left a reply, but will elaborate early in the coming week.

        Best wishes and thanks for presenting your interesting work,

        Antony

        Dear Jayakar,

        I want to have long time collaborations with you regarding this. When ever you are free try to contact me to develop this view further.

        Thank you dear Sreenath,

        We will have discussions after some time, on this view.

        With best regards,

        Jayakar

        Dr. Jayakar,

        I thought that your essay was exceptionally well written. I do hope that you do not think me impertinent. I am a crusty old realist and as I have carefully explained in my essay BITTERS, everything in the real Universe is unique, once.

        As you know, each snowflake is unique, once, and that means that each real molecule of each real snowflake must be unique, once. The whole real Universe is unique, once.

        Which brings me to the consideration of your essay's graphics. They are not unique. They are computer generated perfect squares and perfect circle and perfect yellow lightning bolts and while they are pretty to look at, they are unusual, unrealistic, and unnecessary for explaining reality.

        I wish you well in the competition,

        Joe

          Thank you dear Joe,

          You are right, only 'continuum' is in reality that is not quantifiable, while without quantisation 'continuum' is not descriptive and emerges with digitalisation in real numbers that are unique. As the universe is continuum it is realistic rather than probabilistic.

          I would like to go through your essay and submit my perceptions soon.

          With best regards,

          Jayakar

          Dear Jayakar,

          As you indicated above, "In particle scenario, information is energy transfer; whereas in string-matter continuum of eternal universe, information is the transfer of string-matter segment with its rotational energy."

          I believe that this particle view of information is that with which you expressed agreement on my essay page. I will study your essay to try to appreciate the alternate string-matter continuum perspective.

          With best regards,

          Edwin Eugene Klingman

            I thought I'd replied here - may be the system bug again, but thanks for the link!

            Antony