Dear Michel Planat,

No comment about Mao Zedong.

I do not know his work.

His people will judge him.

In every man, in every action there is some bad, some good.

I know by eDuality, error is experience, what not to do. In some cases, extreme cases, unfortunately like the war, like confrontations, push people to excel.

Back to the duality of which I speak.

eDuality is Science, is qualitative science, is hard and deep physics.

eDuality is deep thought.

eDuality is the First and Primary Principle that drives eUniverse.

eDuality explains all things and phenomenon.

Newton : each action-reaction.

Quantum mecanics : wave-particle.

Relativity : Space-time.

Dirac : matter-antimatter.

Big Bang : Gravity-Expansion of space.

All mathematics, philosophy, and in every domain or field.

And so on...

eDuality is wherever you look smarter, unless you do not want to see. It's like saying I do not see motion.

I still do not say anything special about eDuality. I only show what is remarkable.

But the surprise is coming, in my next book.

Best wishes,

Amazigh H.

Dear Amazigh,

interesting essay. I agree that duality is important and for me it is a cornerstone in philosophy too.

Thats the reason why I rated you rather high.

Best

Torsten

    Dear Angel Garces Doz,

    I totally agree with you.

    I still do not say anything special about eDuality. I only show what is remarkable.

    But the surprise is coming, in my next book.

    Best wishes,

    Amazigh H.

    Dear Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga,

    Yes, philosophy is confrontation of two viewpoints : the 0 and 1.

    Best wishes,

    Amazigh H.

    Dear Antoine Acke,

    You can characterize "information" as the substance of fields, in the sens of it is 0 or 1.

    Best wishes,

    Amazigh H.

    Thanks Amazigh,

    your essay is quite reasonable and I rated it accordingly.

    All the best.

    Michel

    Dear Amazigh,

    Thank you for your visit.

    Some your observations :

    '... the duality was obvious to the Egyptians, Greeks, etc.. , And especially the Chinese...

    For me the question is quite different : why we do not have yet flushed the irrefutable arguments that prove that the universe is binary, dualistic...

    Today, Einstein's relativity is well understood in the physical domain. It explains very well the two points of view of two people moving relative to each other...

    Finally, I would like to conjecture that:

    -The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

    -We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

    -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe '

    may suggest some analogies with field findings of structural anthropologists. In particular,French anthropologist Levi-Strauss made reference to 353 duality based different myths in order to prove that the human brain does have a tendency to operate with binary oppositions in all sorts of situations. This result is foundation of structural anthropology and semantic algebra of myths today. However, the sceptics were right as well, because human brain can operate in other ways also. Thus, a fully satisfactory model of the human mind would contain many unknown features which do not occur merely in digital computers. I suppose you can improve your structural linguistic analysis of oppositions by Jakobson's technique based on conjecture that ' in all the languages of the world the complex systems of oppositions between the phonemes are no more than a multi-directional elaboration of a more complex system which is common to all, namely the contrast between consonant and vowel, which through the working of double opposition between compact and diffuse, acute and grave...'

    with the best wishes

    Michael

      Dear Amazigh,

      Agree that -Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers...

      Good luck

      Regards Koorosh

        "Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Universe and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc."

        Do you think such a theory is actually possible? I enjoyed your thoughts though I feel the essay could benefit from some organizational work. Cheers and thanks for rating my essay!!

          Dear Amazigh,

          I liked your essay, it was right at the heart of the question, and right at the heart of physics. Wheeler was hopping on Descarte's thesis "I think therefore I am". Thinking is informational, and thus information comes first, producing it from bit. But as you indicate thinking is only possible via the duality of opposites and thus "It from dualities". I hope I captured your thoughts correctly.

          I am essentially a non dualist, yes dualism is the hard reality, however there is a level above dualism that is not very amenable to conversation. You are, not much to be said about it.

          Now, if you are going to do physics, dualism is the reality. And your conclusion is quite appropriate: -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe.

          I hope that was not too confusing? Bottom line: I like your work and give it a high mark.

          Don L.

            Yes, the theory exists. I am writing the book.

            If somebody ask me to speak about it, I am ready.

            This is not an essay for having the best ranking. I just wanted to draw attention to the subject of duality and see what scientists think about this important subject.

            I'm glad I participated. And I had a favorable response. Some refuse to see any track to be the theory of everything. But the truth is that it is the first theory that explains everything.

            Quantum mechanics and also relativity, mathematics, philosophy and our reasoning, and so on ...

            Best wishes,

            Amazigh

            All things in the universe are information. Then, what information is ? It is the organized energy.

            Ok, what is the energy then?

            We know how it manifests itself, but we do not know what it is. This is the first reality, impossible to fundamentally explain.

            Amazigh

            Thank you very much for your encouragement.

            This theory exists, it is called eDuality.

            Thank you for rating my essay Amazigh,

            I shall try to read yours promptly and rate it before the deadline. I'll also comment if I have thoughts or questions to share.

            Jonathan

              Dear Michael,

              Thank you very much for this information and your comments.

              I did not know this work.

              As I said, duality is everywhere. The elders also said.

              What changes now, today we can explain things with the best of science.

              It is like the motion. Aristotle advanced things, but it was necessary to wait for Galilee, with the experimental science to know more about it.

              About your essay that is very relevant. I think duality is the basis of symmetry, what is your opinion ?

              Best wishes,

              Amazigh H.

              Amazigh,

              Thank you for a very succinct and direct essay.

              I agree with you about the Yin and Yang of duality. It is the reciprocity between the Bit and It that generates the phenomenal universe (re: my essay "A Complex Conjugate Bit and It", which you have reviewed.)

              Best wishes,

              Richard

                Dear Christian,

                Thank you very much for your encouragement.

                You saw very fair.

                Actually I insist, as I know now, the first principle of all is duality.

                You'll find out, hopefully in a few months.

                Regarding the third point:

                « 3) What do you think on my Statement Regarding the duality betweens and bit it, ie" Information physics tells how to work. Physics tells how to information flow "? »

                If you permit, there is what I think:

                « Information tells Energy how to flow. Energy carries Information. »

                Here's how I see it, but not exactly. : Energy is the horse, the rider is Information.

                Because Information is organised Energy.

                In other words. All things in the Universe are information, even the space. Then, what information is ? It is the organized Energy.

                Ok, what is the Energy then?

                We know how it manifests itself, but we do not know what it is. This is the first reality, impossible to fundamentally explain or define.

                Good luck and best wishes,

                Amazigh H.