Dear Amazigh,

Interesting, very reasonable and relevant essay.

Do you think that Mao Zedong did well in his thought and action?

No opinion from my side, just a question.

I just found an excerpt on Internet.

"

(Bingshen August 21), September 25, 1956, Mao Zedong on the wrong duality.

1956, 25, 2009, Mao Zedong with some Latin American representative of the party's conversation, recalling some of the historical experience of the Communist Party of China. He pointed out: "The Communists do not be afraid to make mistakes. Errors duality. The error on the one hand damage the party, harm the people; on the other hand is a good teacher, a good education to the party, and education of the people, good revolution. Failure is the mother of success. Failure if no good, why is the mother of success? Errors committed too much, we must turn. This is Marxism. 'Extremes meet' errors pile up, the light will come. "

Best wishes,

Michel

    Dear Amazigh,

    You concluded:

    "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

    -We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

    -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe.

    -Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc. "

    Thanks for inviting me to your blog, I agree in general and if I may promote my theory based on this duality in answering your call for a new theory: KQID please comment my essay Child of Qbit in time and hope you give me a raise in ranking if you approve it. If I may introduce KQID with a long summary.

    In summary, quoting my answer to Michel Planat and please forgive me for being respectfully and humbly boastful to counter the doubtful: First, KQID Qbit is (00,1,-1) which is singularity Qbit Multiverse in zeroth dimension at absolute zero temperature that computes and projects Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagoras complex triangles or Fu Xi's gua or Fibonacci numbers) onto the 2D Minkowski Null geodesics and then instantaneously into the 3D in Lm, our Multiverse timeline to allows Existence to move around 360 degree and its arrows of time or ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm). New informations are created and distributed per ≤10^-1000 seconds. No information is ever deleted. KQID is the only theory out there that can calculate the dark energy of our Multiverse ≤10^-153Pm/Pv and the minimum bits as the lower bound ≥ 10^153 bits in our Multiverse. KQID is the only theory that I know here that proves bit = it; KQID calculates Sun lights into Sun bits; calculates electron, proton and neutron in terms of bits; set up equivalent principle of bits with energy and matter. Therefore, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it. Please correct me if I am wrong. And, KQID is the only theory in this universe has the mechanism on how Holographic Principle works. Also answer the mother of all questions, the why, how and what Existence.

    KQID's Origin of Mass:

    Furthermore, KQID is the only theory that can explain the origin of mass as A+S=E=ψI(CTE) that Wilczek said admittedly in 2012 after the discovery of Higgs boson mH ≈ 125 GeV in his tour the force article Origins of Mass arXiv:1206.7114v2 that human beings do not yet know the origins of mass and it is not even in sight. He concluded on page 32/35 and lamented like Einstein 51 years before: "We've passed some milestones, but the end of the road is not in sight." Einstein, after his landmark article 107 years ago on m=E/c^2 showing mass in terms of energy in 1905, "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend on Its Energy Content?" But this equation required us to know what is energy before we can define the origin of mass. Einstein truly like Socrates before him as the wisest man in Athens according to the Oracle simply because Socrates claims that he does not know anything, Einstein the wise similarly stated his own ignorance of energy in 1951: "All these fifty years of pondering have not brought me closer to answering the question, what is light quanta?"

    KQID's origin of mass is simply A + S = E = ψI(CTE) that is Dao's Wuwei (the least action moves) maximizing the flow of A, anti-entropic time-future bits-waves function moving from future to time-present bits-waves function E in optimizing the E flow and minimizing the flow of S, entropic time-past bits-waves function moving from time-past to time-present in terms of both bits and joules SI. That also leads to Pauli's exclusion principle and the lowest amount of energy arrangement required in an atomic system. See KQID Ouroboros Equations of Existence.

    Michel asked the heart of KQID: "Where is the FAPAMA concept coming from in your frame? I mean who is the influencial thinker?"

    First from Fu Xi's gua(trigrams) Ξ ☷ as DIRECT representations of nature, from Pythagoras's all things are numbers, from Jesus's Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Ghost, from Hindu's Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, from Planck's intelligent mind as the matrix of all matter and from Maxwell's infinite being with infinite storage capacity who computes in bits/qbits to create and distributes energy that does works, and from Landauer who teaches us that information is physical and nature can freely create and distribute bits/qbits but to erase/deletes the created bits/qbits must incur entropy cost somewhere else in Multiverse. That is why our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit does not and can not erase any information. The computation of Holographic Principle must be within the one and only Qbit(00,1,-1) showing that Existence origin is from Non-existence and the calculations of Einstein complex coordinates can only be done at absolute zero temperature in which Bose-Einstein superconductivity perfectly happens without resistance or entropy. From Susskind and Hooft, who got the idea from Beckenstein-Hawking black hole entropy, proposed/discovered Holographic Principle and Hooft's quantum entanglements must be from the beginning. Thus FAPAMA Qbit must be there from the beginning (Hooft) and splits freely without cost (Landauer and Guth) to itself and Multiverse infinitely every absolute digital time T≤ 10^-1000 seconds. Moreover, every T-moment, our FAPAMA Qbit escapes extinction from its forever chasing companion Non-existence to be reunited only just barely by rebooting, resynchronizing, refreshing, renewing and reborn itself, so that it is forever just newly born evolved immortal baby. This gives us the arrow of time. Ξ00☷ = < S | E | A > = ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) ⊆ T. Time reemerges every digital T-moment. Every T-moment Qbit resynchronizes all Minkowski events in time-present. This is the KEY in re-entangling everything and keeping things in order and not crashing down. Complementarily, KQID also supports block Multiverse within T-moment in which all time-past-present-futures are forged into the NOW that in turn enabling resynchronization above! Time disappears. Yes, Einstein-KQID relativity rules (8πG/c^4)Tμν - Kqid(ΑΘ-ΘS)gμν = Τμν block Multiverse. Yes, Existence is the founder of creativity, it must invent new ways to escape from the grip of its Non-existence complementarity-companion. Dear Akinbo, KQID answers your immortal question if our founder is it or bit. The Founder Qbit is both bit and it simultaneously. Existence-Non-existence is one Qbit. This Qbit is It as Existence. FAPAMA: FA in Chinese means law like law of gravity that gives Existence order in time, PA from the concept of papa or the Holy Ghost or Brahma or Fu XI heaven Ξ that connects everything with everything else as one meaningful whole that manifests in quantum mechanics as Hooft's physical quantum entanglement. Yes, quantum entanglement phenomena must be instantaneous with infinite speed because it is within that one Qbit, there is no gap, no space, no time, no dimension, no locality but it is everywhere locally in physical forms that are derivative from MA as mama trigram earth ☷ that gives birth to mass and structure of Existence in ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) relativistic Multiverse in which time contracts, thus length contracts and mass/energy increases. So you see KQID gives picture of Existence as fantastically magical Disney's world, a holographic but physically relativistic fiction but real Multiverse. We are active game changers in our Wheeler's participatory magical kingdom, the Leibniz's happiest Multiverse possible. Because we are limited, we have choices to make including mistakes that lead to man/nature made miseries; so that we have free will to enjoy this wonderful make-believe holographic world. Let us sing and praise Xuan Yuan's Da Tong song and dance.

    Amazigh, we do have similar idea not only as co-passenger on timeship earth but also co-mind sharing adventurers.

    Best wishes,

    LeoKoGuan

      Hi Amazigh,

      I have read your elegant Essay, as I promised you in my Essay page. Here are my comments/questions.

      1) I find that your Essay is quite poetical, and, in turn, very particular.

      2) I like that you emphasize the importance of duality and your statement that "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality" is intriguing and could be really correct.

      3) What do you think on my statement concerning the duality between it and bit, i.e. "Information tells physics how to work. Physics tells information how to flow"?

      In any case, your Essay is very peculiar, beautiful and enjoyable, thus, I will give you a high rate.

      Cheers,

      Ch.

        Dear Amazigh: In his essay makes an interesting collection of the emergence of the principle of duality as you define it.

        Do you make this definition: "-The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe."

        I totally agree with the importance of the principle of duality. But we need a description of the same physical and mathematical.

        In principle one could start with a definition of duality at the level of mathematical functions. For example, a mathematical function and / or algorithm has duality, with a sense applicable to the physical world, if you meet certain conditions or axioms.

        1) must be multivalued. 2) adopts the dual and complementary values ​​0 and 1. Ie represent truth values ​​of logical functions.

        One of these functions, within the core of the quantum theory is: EXP (i2Pin) = 1 = cos (2Pin) ix sin (2Pin) (= 0)

        This function is implicit main duality of all: truth function 1, 0. 1.0 etc probability. I Rate your essay days ago with a high punctuation. Thank you for your comments on my essay. And I wish you the best of luck. Angel Garces Doz

          Dear Amazigh H.,

          Thank you for posting in my essay where I characterize "information" as the substance of fields, and consequently as a substantial element of nature.

          I read your essay and APPRECIATE your interesting ideas and the way you express them.

          Antoine.

            Dear Michel Planat,

            No comment about Mao Zedong.

            I do not know his work.

            His people will judge him.

            In every man, in every action there is some bad, some good.

            I know by eDuality, error is experience, what not to do. In some cases, extreme cases, unfortunately like the war, like confrontations, push people to excel.

            Back to the duality of which I speak.

            eDuality is Science, is qualitative science, is hard and deep physics.

            eDuality is deep thought.

            eDuality is the First and Primary Principle that drives eUniverse.

            eDuality explains all things and phenomenon.

            Newton : each action-reaction.

            Quantum mecanics : wave-particle.

            Relativity : Space-time.

            Dirac : matter-antimatter.

            Big Bang : Gravity-Expansion of space.

            All mathematics, philosophy, and in every domain or field.

            And so on...

            eDuality is wherever you look smarter, unless you do not want to see. It's like saying I do not see motion.

            I still do not say anything special about eDuality. I only show what is remarkable.

            But the surprise is coming, in my next book.

            Best wishes,

            Amazigh H.

            Dear Amazigh,

            interesting essay. I agree that duality is important and for me it is a cornerstone in philosophy too.

            Thats the reason why I rated you rather high.

            Best

            Torsten

              Dear Angel Garces Doz,

              I totally agree with you.

              I still do not say anything special about eDuality. I only show what is remarkable.

              But the surprise is coming, in my next book.

              Best wishes,

              Amazigh H.

              Dear Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga,

              Yes, philosophy is confrontation of two viewpoints : the 0 and 1.

              Best wishes,

              Amazigh H.

              Dear Antoine Acke,

              You can characterize "information" as the substance of fields, in the sens of it is 0 or 1.

              Best wishes,

              Amazigh H.

              Thanks Amazigh,

              your essay is quite reasonable and I rated it accordingly.

              All the best.

              Michel

              Dear Amazigh,

              Thank you for your visit.

              Some your observations :

              '... the duality was obvious to the Egyptians, Greeks, etc.. , And especially the Chinese...

              For me the question is quite different : why we do not have yet flushed the irrefutable arguments that prove that the universe is binary, dualistic...

              Today, Einstein's relativity is well understood in the physical domain. It explains very well the two points of view of two people moving relative to each other...

              Finally, I would like to conjecture that:

              -The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

              -We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

              -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe '

              may suggest some analogies with field findings of structural anthropologists. In particular,French anthropologist Levi-Strauss made reference to 353 duality based different myths in order to prove that the human brain does have a tendency to operate with binary oppositions in all sorts of situations. This result is foundation of structural anthropology and semantic algebra of myths today. However, the sceptics were right as well, because human brain can operate in other ways also. Thus, a fully satisfactory model of the human mind would contain many unknown features which do not occur merely in digital computers. I suppose you can improve your structural linguistic analysis of oppositions by Jakobson's technique based on conjecture that ' in all the languages of the world the complex systems of oppositions between the phonemes are no more than a multi-directional elaboration of a more complex system which is common to all, namely the contrast between consonant and vowel, which through the working of double opposition between compact and diffuse, acute and grave...'

              with the best wishes

              Michael

                Dear Amazigh,

                Agree that -Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers...

                Good luck

                Regards Koorosh

                  "Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Universe and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc."

                  Do you think such a theory is actually possible? I enjoyed your thoughts though I feel the essay could benefit from some organizational work. Cheers and thanks for rating my essay!!

                    Dear Amazigh,

                    I liked your essay, it was right at the heart of the question, and right at the heart of physics. Wheeler was hopping on Descarte's thesis "I think therefore I am". Thinking is informational, and thus information comes first, producing it from bit. But as you indicate thinking is only possible via the duality of opposites and thus "It from dualities". I hope I captured your thoughts correctly.

                    I am essentially a non dualist, yes dualism is the hard reality, however there is a level above dualism that is not very amenable to conversation. You are, not much to be said about it.

                    Now, if you are going to do physics, dualism is the reality. And your conclusion is quite appropriate: -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe.

                    I hope that was not too confusing? Bottom line: I like your work and give it a high mark.

                    Don L.

                      Yes, the theory exists. I am writing the book.

                      If somebody ask me to speak about it, I am ready.

                      This is not an essay for having the best ranking. I just wanted to draw attention to the subject of duality and see what scientists think about this important subject.

                      I'm glad I participated. And I had a favorable response. Some refuse to see any track to be the theory of everything. But the truth is that it is the first theory that explains everything.

                      Quantum mechanics and also relativity, mathematics, philosophy and our reasoning, and so on ...

                      Best wishes,

                      Amazigh

                      All things in the universe are information. Then, what information is ? It is the organized energy.

                      Ok, what is the energy then?

                      We know how it manifests itself, but we do not know what it is. This is the first reality, impossible to fundamentally explain.

                      Amazigh

                      Thank you very much for your encouragement.

                      This theory exists, it is called eDuality.

                      Thank you for rating my essay Amazigh,

                      I shall try to read yours promptly and rate it before the deadline. I'll also comment if I have thoughts or questions to share.

                      Jonathan

                        Dear Michael,

                        Thank you very much for this information and your comments.

                        I did not know this work.

                        As I said, duality is everywhere. The elders also said.

                        What changes now, today we can explain things with the best of science.

                        It is like the motion. Aristotle advanced things, but it was necessary to wait for Galilee, with the experimental science to know more about it.

                        About your essay that is very relevant. I think duality is the basis of symmetry, what is your opinion ?

                        Best wishes,

                        Amazigh H.