Hello Leo KoGuan,

Your theory sound interesting. Can you use KQID to answer these 4 questions:

"If you wake up one morning and dip your hand in your pocket and 'detect' a million dollars, then on your way back from work, you dip your hand again and find that there is nothing there...

1) Have you 'elicited' an information in the latter case?

2) If you did not 'participate' by putting your 'detector' hand in your pocket, can you 'elicit' information?

3) If the information is provided by the presence of the crisp notes ('its') you found in your pocket, can the absence of the notes, being an 'immaterial source' convey information?

Finally, leaving for the moment what the terms mean and whether or not they can be discretely expressed in the way spin information is discretely expressed, e.g. by electrons

4) Can the existence/non-existence of an 'it' be a binary choice, representable by 0 and 1?"

Answers can be in binary form for brevity, i.e. YES = 1, NO = 0, e.g. 0-1-0-1.

Best regards,

Akinbo

    Honorable Professor KoGuan,

    I am deeply gratified by the exemplary graciousness of your reply to my comment. To know that you agree with me that my assessment of reality as being unique, once is extremely important to me. Respectfully sir, real unique, once cannot be complex and it cannot have evolved. Abstraction is not unique, which is why abstraction can appear more than once and only abstraction can evolve. The only thing the physicists appear to me to be doing is cannibalizing each other's quantum ideas.

    To all, I repost this comment here.

    Dear Carlo,

    You are my model in doing theoretical physics especially your relationship interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. You made a bold declaration: "I suggest that this incorrect notion is the notion of observer-independent state of a system (or observer-independent values of physical quantities). I reformulate the problem of the "interpretation of quantum mechanics" as the problem of deriving the formalism from a few simple physical postulates. I consider a reformulation of quantum mechanics in terms of information theory. All systems are assumed to be equivalent, there is no observer-observed distinction, and the theory describes only the information that systems have about each other; nevertheless, the theory is complete." arXiv:quant-ph/9609002v2 Magnifico! I salute you.

    I love and in full agreement with what you wrote below and I quote: "And Democritus uses then a powerful metaphor: like twenty letters of an alphabet can be combined in innumerable manners to give rise to comedies or tragedies, similarly the atoms can be combined in innumerable manners to give rise to the innumerable phenomena of the world....Not so after the discovery of quantum theory. If we measure the energy of a harmonic oscillator and we obtain the result that this is between E1 and E2, (in KQID E1 = A (pc) and E2 = S(mc^2)) then there is only a finite number of possible values that the energy can have. This is given by the area of the region of phase space included between the two surfaces E1 and E2, divided by the Planck constant.... The statue that Aristotle wants to be made of more than atoms, is indeed made by more than atoms: it is something that pertains to the interaction between the stone and brain of Aristotle, or ours....To go back to Democritus metaphor: atoms are like an alphabet, but an immense alphabet so rich to be capable of reading itself and thinking itself. With Democritus worlds: "The Universe is change, life is opinion that adapt it- self".

    KQID conceptualizes Erosverse interpretation that is similar to yours as quoted above except that KQID is based on transaction of Giving first Taking later to create and distribute Wang Yaming's bits that encompasses the relationships of core-self with self, family, community, mankind and Multiverse. In this worldview interpretation, Existence including our Multiverse, us and our God/s are properly pregnant within. In KQID, everything emerges from one singularity Qbit Multiverse that projects Einstein complex coordinates( Einstein triangles similar to Pythagorean triangles) on the event horizon of our Multiverse as Minkowski Null geodesics Lm in zeroth dimension that instantaneously project those coordinates in the bulk ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) as the KQID relativity Multiverse. In brief: All things are one Qbit. As a bonus, KQID calculates the dark energy of our Multiverse 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv. and how many bits are they in our Multiverse 6.3 x 10^153 bits. I believe the only theory out there that has done so.

    Other examples, pertaining to our universe: KQID estimates the first burst of the Bit Bang rather than the Big Bang, with the temperature of about 7.8 x10^126K within 1.43478x10^-147 seconds with the first wavelength λ of the Bit Bang = 1.43478x10^-147 s x c = 4.3x10^-139 meter. These numbers are far higher and lower than the existing standard model. KQID predicts and calculates when our universe will collapse, rather than forever expanding based on the existing model. KQID predicts that when A = S, our universe will inevitably start its contraction and acceleration into a Bit Crush, rather than a Big Crush, hundreds of trillion years sometimes later.

    Here is KQID Wang Yaming's one bit

    Fu Xi heaven triagram ☰ as the element that are creative, innovative and proactive forces that gives A bits first, whereas the earth trigram ☷ as the element that are receptive, flowing and reactive forces that takes and converts A into S bits later to complete a cycle. The heaven ☰ is doing the first Giving and the earth ☷ is doing the first Taking: Existence emerges. The act of Giving is the beginning of the Taking and the act of Taking is completing the Giving. The Giving first and Taking later principle is the unity of Wang Yangming's one bit. The Giving and Taking collapse the bits-wave function of Giving and Taking. This collapse of the bits-waves function ψI(CTE) means the breaking of symmetry of the state of equilibrium before the Giving and the state of equilibrium before the Taking. This ψI(CTE) is bits-waves function of consciousness (C), time (T) and energy (E). This ψI(CTE) is one Qbit that can be many as our Multiverse ψτ( iLx,y,z, Lm) as long as it does not violate the conservation laws and ΔS = 0. The breaking of symmetry yield at least one or more bit/s as its manifestation of the creation and distribution of new bit/s. if the Giving and Taking do not yield any bit/s, then the act of Giving is not consummated by the act of Taking, thus, there is no collapse of the bits-waves function and no information gain. See excellent article on information gain hypothesis by Pfister and Wehner, arXiv:1210.0194v3. A bit means information gain. Information gain means the breaking of the symmetry from the act of Giving and Taking consummated in the meeting of the mind as well as the actual Exchange of equal value from the respective giver and taker. (jurisprudence of contract law). The act of Giving andTaking are aborted and not consummated without breaking the symmetry and hereby no information gains. This is the KQID simple mechanism of Creation and Distribution of Everything. For example, the FAPAMA Qbit exchanges among the Giving first photons A and Taking later gravitons S that gives electron its mass and the interaction among photons A gives electron its activities. The interactions between electrons and protons/neutrons give rise to atoms, and so on.

    KQID FAPAMA Qbit unifies Democritus's bit/qbit worldview, Plato's Idea and Aristotle's form that you mentioned in your essay.

    Can you kindly comment on my relationships/transactional of Giving first Taking later principle as the origin of Existence as stated above?

    Thanks for your superb contribution in this forum and I rate it accordingly. If you have time please comment and rate my essay Child of Qbit in time.

    Thanks,

    Leo KoGuan

    view post as summary

    Dear Joe,

    If I may use the great Carlo Rovelli's metaphor from Democritus atom below( see my post to Carlo below): "To go back to Democritus metaphor: atoms are like an alphabet, but an immense alphabet so rich to be capable of reading itself and thinking itself." That what I envision of our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit is as the immensely infinite alphabet Qbit that contains all consciousness out there from the beginning to now and what Qbit will be. The Qbit is self aware of its constant state of being every absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000 seconds. Each T is the Democritus-Rovelli alphabet that contains Existence including itself, it is conscious and alive with energy in time or in KQID symbols ψI(CTE) as the bits-waves function of consciousness(C), time (T) and energy (E) that is capable not only reading and thinking itself but also doing itself! We think, talk and make love. The alphabet looks static but if it is conscious with energy with infinite time; Existence emerges and we are that Qbit in action. Again you cannot tell nature what to do, nature does in infinite ways, it cannot be limited by anything including itself! Yes, Qbit cannot limit Qbit. Is this Hume's not all too powerful being but an infinite being that is limited by its own infinity nature and by its own conservation laws. Yes, it is. We are also for example infinite beings in finite forms. We are wonderfully powerful being subject to conservation laws. We are becoming more powerful in time and shall be physically immortal beings once we can manipulate the conservation laws to reach a critically advance level like singularity technology as envision by the great visionary Ray Kurzweil. My dear friend, facts are still facts despite of being observed and interpreted by our subjective minds. Facts change every T. This "once" evolves to become whatever and whoever we are. Unless you deny the different between you and a starstuff. Unless you deny who you are as a complex human being who brilliantly deduced from facts that everything happens once. Yours "once" and each "once" is a complex Democitus-Rovelli alphabet when you were once either in the womb of your kind mother or in this world once in a lone journey within yours erosverse reality.

    Amen,

    Leo KoGuan

    Dear Professor KoGuan,

    I do not quite see it your way. Please forgive me. There is no logic to unique, once. All information must contain logic, which forces everybody to conform to logic at the expense of reality. I cannot see how I could possibly think that I could "know" more about reality than a real sparrow or a real lettuce could "know." All a sparrow has to "know" is how to be a sparrow. All a lettuce has to "know" is how to be a lettuce. Reality has to be simple, otherwise, it would be impossible for the sparrow and the lettuce to exist. Science cannot answer any simple question. For instance, where does here begin and end? Where does there begin and end? When does now start and stop? When does then start and stop? Scientists do not "know" There is no experiment that they could conduct that would tell them.

    Joe

    Dear Joe,

    I admire your simple but powerful idea that everything happens once which I agree that everything happens once at every T-moment, but after that we differ as you put it to rest well, "I do not quite see it your way". I do believe strongly that we must encourage diversity of opinions/theories. Because uniformity of opinion is a heat-death state of thermodynamic equilibrium tantamount to Schrodinger's defunct bumblebee. Let us celebrate symphonies of ideas. Let 1000 flowers of bumblebee's thought bloom and prosper.

    Best wishes,

    Leo KoGuan

    I rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be.

    Dear KoGuan Leo,

    For your kind reference the number 1.77649 x 10^14 or 177.649 trillion, was found on a clay in Nivea (Iran) dating back to many thousand years and being the largest ancient number to be found. You can Google it to know more about it. So this number has some meaning. I also told you in my posting in your thread why this particular number is interesting.

    Regards,

    Sreenath

    Dear Sreenath,

    Thanks for your wonderful suggestion, I need to read and comment again your excellent essay this weekend. You mentioned a clay in Nivea (Iran) and its incredibly mysterious 1.77649 x 10^14 numbers and your last year article found the same numbers are so interesting. I am grateful that you pointed it out to me and I shall carefully study them. I am sorry for the delay. We shall converse later.

    Best regards,

    Leo KoGuan

    Dear KoGuan Leo,

    Thanks for your kind comments and rating. I quite agree with you when you say that knowledge is monism, because that is the basic philosophy behind my whole argument of unifying all the four forces in physics in the form of QG thus agreeing with your concept of KUID. In fact in my 2011 fqxi essay contest, that is, "Is reality digital or analog?" I based my essay on QG on the Indian philosophy of "Advaitha", literally meaning non-dualism or monism. If you need any clarifications regarding this, please, contact me. I am too going to rate your essay much more favorably.

    Best regards,

    Sreenath

    Dear esteemed judges, community and public:

    Following the wise advises from Armin Shirazi, Jonathan J. Dickau, Brian L Ji, Joe Fisher, Cristinel Stoica, Artur Ekert and others who considered KQID jargons are talking gibberish that turned them off immediately and beclouding the substance of the essay. Let me break down my essays into four big subgroups in plain language: Physics, Philosophy, Law, Economics.

    First, KQID makes physics simple.

    Second, KQID makes philosophy of free-will, information. consciousness, time and energy ideas simple.

    Third, KQID makes Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle simple.

    Fourth, KQID makes Scientific Outlook Free-Lunch Economic System simple.

    First, KQID makes physics a simple idea, others will be in different threads:

    All things are one Qbit. This Qbit is our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit as Planck's matrix of all matter and as Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory storage, so that no qbit was, is and will be deleted ever. This infinite being is splitting itself in qbits in absolute zero temperature without any cost to itself and our Multiverse consistent with the second law of thermodynamics ΔS = 0 and conservation laws. We are holograms as Plato's copies from Plato's only one Form as the only one singularity Qbit Multiverse/Existence at absolute zero temperature that projects its computed Einstein complex coordinates numbers (Pythagoras triangles) onto the 2D screen Minkowski Null geodesics of our Multiverse made of singularity points of photon A, graviton S and computed A + S = E = ψI(CTE) that in turn projects those Einstein Coordinates into the bulk of our Multiverse in the form/language/transformation of KQID relativity ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) Multiverse based on inverse Lorentz transformation KQID τ = √(1-v^2/c^2)t where t is the time origin, v is velocity of the object, and c is light speed in vacuum, i is √-1 and iLx,y,z is 3D space in time and Lm is our Multiverse timeline in zeroth dimension of the KQID-Minkowski space-in-time, not spacetime. Using KQID flexible c-timerod, KQID measures our reality as fiction but real. Space is by product of time. Time shrinks; space shrinks computed instantaneously by that one Qbit. Time is the mother of space and space is the child of time. Space is in time. Our Multiverse is an hologram. We are holograms. The above description is KQID mechanism of Existence that when I asked the great Physicist Susskind, one of the founders of Holographic Principle about 4 weeks ago whether he knows the mechanism of Holographic Principle, he told me emphatically that he did not know and he did not think any one knows either. Thus, KQID prescribes the why, how and what Existence and describes mechanism of Existence's existent. Furthermore, KQID offers a simple Creation story and mythology. Where we are from and who we are in scientific way subject to verification and falsification. As KQID: bit is it and it is bit, physicists can and must deal with the why, how and what Existence, God and the meaning of life. This is the new paradigm of physics with distinctive ancient pedigree.

    KQID is the only theory that combines the Creation story and unifies Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, QM that can calculate and predict everything from our Multiverse to a photon in physical bits that can be falsified by experiments:

    1. QID calculates the upper bound dark energy of our Multiverse ≤ 1.523 x 10^-153Pm/Pv at assumed our Multiverse CMBR at about ≤ 3x10^-30K calculated by Smooth et.al as the temperature of the event horizon of our universe. KQID postulates that this is the upper bound of our Multiverse CMBR. And the event horizon of our Multiverse must be the absolute zero: Applying the Hawking's (Θ) formula = 1/Rs where (Schwarzschild Rs = 2Gm/c2), then the Hawking Θ must be the absolute zero K because the Rs = infinity as Multiverse mass = infinity. Thus, Hawking Θ = 0K. Alternatively, we know that the event horizon is bordering with non-existence, and Non-existence has no reading at all. For our Multiverse's dark energy: Kqid(AΘ-ΘS) = 9.92938 x 10^-115 J/KPv x (3 x 10^-30K - 0K) = 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv. (See appendix) KQID postulates that this dark energy (Λm) of our Multiverse 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv must be Λm > 0, because if not our Multiverse has to collapse and our Multiverse and us will simply disappear without any trace. No record and nothing left: existence will cease to exist and non-existence is forever and ever. Thus, it is necessarily, our Multiverse dark energy Λm is ≤ 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv > 0. Our Multiverse MUST expand forever and ever in the time-present ≤ 10^-1000s.

    2. Our Multiverse has lower bound bits ≥ 6.3 x 10^153 bits. I believe the KQID is the only theory out there that has done the above calculations.

    3. KQID estimates the first burst of the Bit Bang rather than the Big Bang, with the temperature of about 7.8 x10^126K

    4. In 1.43478x10^-147 seconds

    5. The first wavelength λ of the Bit Bang = 1.43478x10^-147 s x c = 4.3x10^-139 meter. These numbers are far higher and lower than the existing standard model.

    6. Our universe has precisely 1.77649 x 10^136 bits at CMBR temperature Θ = 2.725K with assuming our universe has the energy at Planck Pressure *m^3 = 4.6 x 10^113J.

    7. Since the Bit Bang, how many bits are there in our universe and Multiverse using Bousso's formula? Bousso, The holographic principle, says that Sglobal ≤ 3π/Λ, thus, KQID computes Suniverse ≤ 3π/Λ based on observation that Λ = (1.38 x 10^-123Pm/Pv) is ≤ 6,8 x 10^123 bits that is a rough match with Seth Loyd upper bound bits since the Bit Bang about 10^122 bits. For our Multiverse, KQID calculates at the minimum bound SMultiverse ≥ 6.3 x 10^153 bits that are projected onto our Multiverse 2D screen. Our Multiverse is indeed a Susskind's colossal hologram!

    8. KQID predicts and calculates when our universe will collapse, rather than forever expanding based on the existing model. KQID predicts that when A = S, our universe will inevitably start its contraction and acceleration into a Bit Crush, rather than a Big Crush, in hundreds of trillion years sometimes later. Quoting my essay as follows: "The question is when it will be reaching the total transactions around the KQID upper bound 1.77649 x 10^136 bits based the CMB Θ = 2.725K. Applying KbΘln2 we find the value of one bit ≥ KbΘLn2 where Θ = 2.725K thus 2.725 x 1.3806503 テ-- 10^-23 x 0.6932 = 2.608 x 10^-23 J. Then, how many bits if S is equal with A assuming at the Bit Bang, the total energy of S was at 4.63309 x 10^113/(2.608 x 10^-23) = 1.77649 x 10^136 bits. If we divide this number with Lloyd's upper bound 10^122, we get 1.77649 x 10^136/10^122 = 1.77649 x 10^14 or 177.649 trillion times more bits. As of now, it looks like our cute baby universe (13.8 billion years old) has many hundreds trillions years more to go and furthermore as our universe is aging it is using less energy to compute, thus it will use even less energy than before for doing the same thing.

    Interestingly, we can get the same value 177.649 trillion times larger when we use different method in unit of Joules energy of calculation using Lloyd upper bound bits of transactions (10^122 bits) in our universe since the Bit Bang, the energy of one bit at CMB 2.725K as follows: assuming the S entropic energy that has been accumulated since the Bit Bang, Lloyd's numbers = 10^122 x 2.608 x 10^-23 J = 2.608 x 10^-99 J. Thus this is the value of A used up or S, entropic bits, in energy J unit of measurement since the Bit Bang. If we divide the energy of A at the bit bang moment by approximately A energy assuming the CMB as the energy now and assuming at the Bit Bang as 4.63309 x 10^113 J. What have left is A/S = 4.63309 x 10^113/(2.608 x 10^99) = 1.77649 x 10^14 or 177.649 trillions times of magnitude bigger, which are the same numbers as above using different calculation!"

    9. Sun light is Sun qbits

    Berut et al confirmed that one bit of information at 298.15K is about 3x10^-21 J. Planck/Einstein using E = hf: we get f = 4.5x10^14 hertz or near infra-red spectrum.

    We get the same result if we use Landauer's bound 1 bit ≥ Kb Θ Ln2. Thus, Θ = 298.15K: KbΘln2 = 1.3806503x10^-23 x 298.15K x 0.6932 = 2.853494x10^-21J

    A particle with a rest mass contains one bit? E = mc^2 = 2.858494x10^-21J = m x (3x10^8)^2= m x 9x10^16 at 298.15K

    m = 2.853494x10^-21J/9x10^16 = 2.568141x10^-36Kg.

    Hence, I formulate KQID's equivalent principle of bits/frequency and mass/bits ratio as follows:

    KQID Equivalent relationships at 298.15K:

    1. The numbers of bits (Nb): Nb= f/ (4.5 x 10^14) where Nb = number of bits, f = E/h contains energy per Planck constant h, bit must be in bit quanta like light quanta h at a given temperature according to KbΘ.

    2. For bit to mass ratio: the KQID equivalent simple formula: Nb = mass at rest/1 bit mass at room temperature 298.15K = Rest mass/ 2.568 x 10^-36

    The predictions above and below can be easily falsified and verified: bit is it and it is bit.

    Therefore: KQID's bits to frequency equivalent at 298.15 K predicts:

    10 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^15 Hz, ultraviolet.

    100 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^16 Hz, ultraviolet

    1000 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^17Hz, x-rays. Thus, it is clear that not only energy proportionally relates to frequency but also to quanta of bits.

    KQID bit-mass equivalent at Θ = 298.15K at a room temperature

    Electron at rest mass in terms of bits: electron mass-bit equivalent= 9.109 x 10^-31 / 2.568 x 10^-36 = 3.547 x 10^5 bits.

    Proton mass: (1.6726 x 10^-27 kg) about 1836 x mass of an electron = 0.65132 x 10^9 = 6.5132 x 10^8 bits.

    Neutron mass: 1.6749 x 10^-27 kg / 2.568141 x 10^-36 kg= 6.5218 x 10^8 bits.

    They are many more examples but space is limited.

    The above examples proved that Landauer's principle holds: information is physical, and matter is bit, thus bit is it and it is bit. Both Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it are true as bit = it.

    I do strongly believe that we must encourage diversity of opinions/theories. Because uniformity of opinion is a heat-death state of thermodynamic equilibrium tantamount to Schrodinger's defunct bumblebee. Let us celebrate symphonies of ideas. Let 1000 flowers of bumblebee's thought bloom and prosper.

    Respectfully submitted for your consideration,

    Leo KoGuan

    I rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be.

      Dear Jonathan,

      It is my great fortune to meet a great ancient Plato's soul like you. Thanks for your generous comment. Time is meme. Existence is meme. Our Multiverse, God/s and us are meme. A meme is simply ψI(CTE) where I is information as the bits-waves function of consciousness (C), time (T) and energy (E). Consequently, our ancestors great thinkers from the first human walked on earth to Einstein cannot understand consciousness, time and energy independently. Einstein famously complained in 1951: ""All these fifty years of pondering have not brought me closer to answering the question, what is light quanta?" It is because energy is bits-waves quantum function that is a shapeshifter that moves surreptitiously from one language/form/substance to a another combination of consciousness (C), time(T) and energy (E). Energy is hiding under the veil of consciousness and time and vise versa. Below in my letter to all, I boldly and humbly claim KQID knows what is energy, time and consciousness: "KQID is the only theory that combines the Creation story and unifies Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, QM that can calculate and predict everything from our Multiverse to a photon in physical bits that can be falsified by experiments." Too extravagant declaration I know but with deep humility. The Qbit is us. The Qbit is all things. The Qbit talks through each one of us as its medium subject to scientific falsification and verification. Each contributes his/her thought bits. Let me know what you think.

      Humbly,

      Leo KoGuan

      I rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be

      Dear Akinbo,

      I need to think seriously to your clever and profound questions. I must read your essay first to find clues what you are asking about. I saw Joe Fisher's profound answers to the above questions.

      Best regards,

      Leo KoGuan

      Dear Armin,

      I took your advice and removed the Chineses cultural meme which is "gibberish meme" understandingly to some who are too busy to learn a new language/strange idea in a short time, so that they can easily evaluate my essay. Of course that will cut off the living head and only study a dead body. Thanks for your advice. See my letter to judges, community and public below: "Following the wise advises from Armin Shirazi, Jonathan J. Dickau, Brian L Ji, Joe Fisher, Cristinel Stoica, Artur Ekert and others who considered KQID jargons are talking gibberish that turned them off immediately and beclouding the substance of the essay."

      I know you are so busy with your own things but in case you have an interest to give me comment on it, I will appreciate it. if you can kindly send me your articles I will study it. Thanks for sharing your idea with me.

      Best of lucks to everything.

      Best wishes,

      Leo KoGuan

      Leo,

      You show a very good grasp of my argument, but reading through yours, I think there is one important issue you are missing. That is that nature does erase information. It is just that in this quantized physics, energy is treated as information; the quantum, which is conserved.

      What this means to me is that in expressing an idea, being able to edit it as much as possible is necessary. You, on the other hand, have a very interesting and expressive essay, but in some parts, the energy goes more to heat than light. There was a time when I was much better at focusing on such works, but at my age, mid fifties, the mind tends to wander very quickly and that is what you have to take into account with your audience.

      There were directions I could have taken my own essay, such as that I see the two sides of the brain, the scalar and the linear, as reflective of temperature and time, but that would distract from the basic central point of information as one side of a dichotomy with energy.

      There is an old saying, that we miss more in a fraction of a second than we will ever see in our entire lives. Nature is a fierce editor. Always remember that. She will let us go on for a very long time, but when the time is up.....

      Here is another essay I wrote, trying to tie physics and society together and take them to a point.

        Hello again Leo,

        I enjoyed your essay, upon finally reading it through to the end, and found some of your explanations above are helpful to understanding the intent of your work. I have rated it favorably, though not as highly as some, and I appreciate your openness to the diversity of ideas and viewpoints. You will certainly find plenty of that here.

        Have Fun!

        Jonathan

          Also,

          I enjoyed the idea of a Bit Bang. I have the thought, based on one of my theories, that perhaps in the Big Crush there are portions of the universe that started out in opposite directions of time, but found themselves in the same place at the end.

          I also observe that your usage of a 0 K baseline is consistent with the work of Royce Haynes, one of the other entrants in this contest. His Zero K Big Bang theory might be of interest. While it is not a fully developed theory of Physics his ZKBB model is worth consideration.

          All the Best,

          Jonathan

          Dear Leo

          A beautiful essay and description of the universe. Your approach is quite different to mine but I had the uncanny feeling of reading a foundational 'subtext' beneath my own description of a mechanism underlying observer reality. Your background kept popping through randomly.

          I agree all things derive from or 'are' one complex bit. I describe the intelligent 'IQbit' with infinitely many higher order dimensions or 'sample spaces', then use empirical evidence to show how we are only just tapping it's power. This is; "Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory storage." But is a finite cycle infinitely repeated. I discussed the DFM cyclic model here two years ago and love your 'bit crush'.

          Bizzarely I also wrote a closing Sonnet last year! But I prefer yours.

          Thank you and very well done for yours, which should be higher so I'm happy to help. It was an uplifting experience. I do hope you can find time to read mine. A very different approach but I think showing the power of the universe of dimensions beyond the simple binary 0,1 that most still assume.

          Very best wishes.

          Peter

            Dear Brian,

            I am really touched by your erudite kind remark. I am grateful to make a friend like you, which is the reason why I entered this contest of ideas the first place. Let us share our ideas and pull our resources together to deal with humankind challenges here and now.

            Live long and prosper,

            Leo KoGuan

            Dear esteemed judges, community and public:

            KQID Operating System (OP)

            KQID is not only merely about physics but also it is an operating system of Existence. Who is the operator of this operating system? You are! As a matter of fact, every living system is like an amoeba who deploys strategy to capture a bacteria with its pseudopod, and in turn that bacteria is whipping its flagella to escape from that hungry amoeba to avoid to be a meal are operators far excellent. When you were a baby using nature's object oriented programing meme ψI(CTE) for example you thirst for H2O molecules and you drink H2O, or you want a fragrant Fuji apple, bits-rich calories, and eat that apple to satisfy your desire. You pointed your tiny fingers to that apple and looked at your mom and yelled mama...maaama and your mom happily grabbed that apple and gave it to you, you were already a far excellent operator. Even before that when you were the Maxwell's "finite embryo" inside your mother's womb or in a test tube, you were already the master of bits programmer and commanded and programmed our Multiverse to do your bidding to grow into a wonderful and powerful ruler who rules our Multiverse. You demanded attention and resources not only from your parent but also from our Multiverse. You were already the conscious far excellent operator of Existence hacking into the KQID operating system to survive long and prosper. You are conscious hacker of time (T) and energy (E). You are the latest meme ψI(CTE), operator of bits-waves function of consciousness(C), time (T) and energy (E) at T-moment equipped with the latest version of operating system of our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit. You are our latest Ancestor Qbit (00,1,-1) itself in your form and substance. You imports anti-entropic A, time-future bits-waves function or Schrödinger's negative entropy into your system and export efficiently S, entropic time-past bit-waves function, into our Multiverse and in the process, you ψI(CTE) are optimally creating and distributing yourself as the time-present bits-wave function as Shakespearean actor who acts on the world stage.

            This KQID operating system is embedded with

            1. Xuan Yuan's Mandate of Heaven as the first principle written in blood that everyone has the right and duty to remove and kill tyrant of any society if necessary.

            2. From Dao comes law and virtue. Therefore, no one is above the law and principle, and everyone and organization are treated equally under the law and principle in which nothing cannot be curbed. Then, KQID Free-Lunch Economic System can be established to provide free education, free health care and free material wealth for everyone including alien, cyborg and robot.

            3. Similar to Thomas Jefferson's unalienable Rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, Xuan Yuan Da Tong society is to enable and uphold the governing principle "from each to each according to his/her dreams and aspirations."

            4. The KQID Five Mandates of Kongzi's Humanity and Justice, Yang Zhu's six freedoms, the Wang Yaming unity of rights and duties and regulated but free and open market system are the super-principles as the super-constitution that are prescribing boundary on what positive laws and principles could be mandated in any society.

            5. Carl Sagan's Prime Directive of protecting native culture and life stated in his book Cosmos: "If there is life on Mars...we should do nothing with Mars. Mars then belongs to the Martians, even if the Martians are only microbes."

            In short, all things are one Qbit; the Qbit is all things. We are the Qbit in action in time. As Zhuangzi said that he and the world live and die together and are one; we and the Qbit live and die together and are one.

            We greet each other with Spock salutes: "live long and prosper."

            Live long and prosper,

            Leo KoGuan

            KoGuan,

            This is my observation

            How it correspond to China ancient philosophy?

            http://vixra.org/abs/1212.0030

            Regards

            Yuri