Dear Wang,
You develop the far reaching idea that information is created by symmetry breaking.
I found at least one relevant paper for this issue "Information Originates in Symmetry Breaking"
by John Collier, Symmetry: Science and Culture 7 (1996): 247-256, available on line.
At first sight, this "bit from it" perspective seems to contradict Wheeler's observer participancy
when symmetry breaking ideas are implemented in the quantum domain. This aspect is developed
at length in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/
Pierre Curie (the father of piezoelectricity and thus of modern quartz cristal clocks) explained to us
that "symmetry breaking has the following role: for the occurrence of a phenomenon in a medium, the original
symmetry group of the medium must be lowered (broken, in today's terminology) to the symmetry group of the
phenomenon (or to a subgroup of the phenomenon's symmetry group) by the action of some cause."
I still plagiarize the encyclopedia
"Goldstone theorem. In the case of a global continuous symmetry, massless bosons (known as "Goldstone bosons")
appear with the spontaneous breakdown of the symmetry according to a theorem first stated by J. Goldstone in 1960.
The presence of these massless bosons, first seen as a serious problem since no particles of the sort had been
observed in the context considered, was in fact the basis for the solution -- by means of the so-called Higgs mechanism"
Now I switch to my own essay which claims that contextuality has to do with Grothendieck's drawings: they correspond to
subgroups of the free group on two generators. Thus your approach does not contradict mine and the "it from bit"
perspective. I am happy of that.
Thank you and best wishes.
Michel