• [deleted]

Dreams are quantum gravity. I already proved this. Mathematics involves detached and narrow thought/thinking ability. However, the integrated extensiveness of description is required to unify physics fundamentally.

There is (and can be) no direct, actual/real/true, and full experience (seen, felt, and touched) of outer space. Outer space destroys and precludes our thought and experience (including vision). The understanding of outer space is inherently and significantly limited.

There is (and can be) no true/real and fundamentally unified quantum gravitational description involving outer space.

Natural experience naturally and fundamentally unifies physics.

  • [deleted]

1) E = mc2

2) E = hf

3) mt = s (cig equation - mass multiplies by time = space)(using lower case letters)

4) m = s/t ( cig normalized to mass(matter) = space divided by time)

5) E = s/t c2 (substitution of eq. 4 into eq. 1)

6) f = 1/t (frequency equation)

7) s/t c2 = hf (equivalent substitution of eq. 5 into eq. 2)

8) Note in eq. 7 that both sides (f & s/t) are time consistent with the concept of frequency (i.e. 1/t)

9) h = s/t c2 all divided by f (solving for h)

10) does equation 9 suggest that h = rate of spatial expansion ???

11) Does equation 7 also represnt that, s c2 = h (i.e. does the /t & 1/t (for frequency) cancel out ?? (bad at math)

12) If s c2 = h, what does this conceptually mean ?

13) c2 = h/s

14) c = sq. rt. of h/s (what does this conceptually represent)

14) The equivalency of mass to space can be found at: www.cigtheory.com

PS - I thought that there were other postings on this site, prior to mine?

THX

doug

    • [deleted]

    Clarification of Intent

    1) E = mc2

    2) E = hf

    3) mt = s (cig equation - mass multiplies by time = space)(using lower case letters)

    4) m = s/t ( cig normalized to mass(matter) = space divided by time)

    5) E = s/t c2 (substitution of eq. 4 into eq. 1)

    6) f = 1/t (frequency equation)

    7) s/t c2 = hf (equivalent substitution of eq. 5 into eq. 2)

    8) Note in eq. 7 that both sides (f & s/t) are time consistent with the concept of frequency (i.e. 1/t)

    9) h = s/t c2 all divided by f (solving for h)

    clarification ( all divided by f = all meaning left hand side of equation (i.e. h = s/t c2 /f)

    9a) so, h = s/t c2 / 1/t (since f - 1/t)

    9b) cancel out time : h = s c2 (end clarification) (don't ever trust my math)

    10) does equation 9 suggest that h = rate of spatial expansion ???

    11) Does equation 7 also represnt that, s c2 = h (i.e. does the /t & 1/t (for frequency) cancel out ?? (bad at math)

    12) If s c2 = h, what does this conceptually mean ?

    13) c2 = h/s

    14) c = sq. rt. of h/s (what does this conceptually represent)

    14) The equivalency of mass to space can be found at: www.cigtheory.com

    THX

    doug

    • [deleted]

    Idiot

    RIGHT HAND SIDE OF EQUATION !

    Hi Doug,

    We may have lost the earlier posts in this thread due to site issues. We'll try and get them back. (But if anyone's posts appears to be missing for no apparent reason, please re-post.)

    13 days later
    • [deleted]

    Slightly off topic but :

    terrible math below...

    OK - so Dark Energy & Dark Matter should not just be looked at on the cosmological scale but the standard model as well.

    Spatial density of Bohr orbitals. Electron field = Dark Matter proceeding to Dark Energy, etc. i.e. anytime mass travels)

    Density of Magnetic fields as new spatial dark energies & volumes of new space

    Black hole = nucleus, etc.

    All taken in context of cig theory & it's offering that it is the matter (mass) that turns into this space (dark matter/dark energy & the in-betweens)

    Turns into this space via the use of time (%"c") The MTS equation

    All based on the theory's offering that it is the spacetime itself that turns into (is a manifestation of) the matter. [matter to space/space to matter]

    That the raisins in the expanding loaf analogy become the space.

    And so my night sky sees the space around the stars coming from the stars.

    Look up and at least try to see what I am seeing.

    Or, look down at the quantum and see the same thing.

    CIG Theory - now an explanation of quantum tunneling (the classical particle becomes spatial enough to overcome the classical barrier) Vibrate quickly enough and turn spatial, then find yourself caught between the decks of the ship on the Philadelphia experiment.

    Also now a quantum gravity theory - equates the two (the spacetime turns into the quantum/classical piece matter) All through %"c"

    Thank you for understanding.

    The insanity of being the only one to see a different night sky is troubling.

    THX

    9 days later
    • [deleted]

    Charles Law and Boyles Law & the balloon experiment (see www.cigtheory.com), the MTS equation & cig theory all offer that it is "New Space" that is being created, not simply a re-positioning of existing space. That new space is created at the expense of mass and it is this aspect of cig theory that mantains the Conservation of Energy Laws.

    Can the mathematicians play with the CUPI and confirm anything?

    Reccommended:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yJBhzMWJCc

    off to work.

    thx for allowing me to post here.

    doug

    6 days later
    • [deleted]

    Hello Again,

    I am attempting to resolve the Cosmological Constant Problem (CCP) where the theoretical value versus the observed value is some 120 orders of magnitude apart. First I need to understand how the values were obtained (I've been trying). Can someone direct me to the simplest site where a layperson can learn this, and if in an equation, where each variable is explicitly explained?

    Knowing nothing just yet, I will approach the solution using CIG Theory and perhaps perhaps, if the current energy associated with mass (E=mc2)is part of those 120 orders of magnitude, recognize that that mass will diminish as the mass' rate of travel increases. It is the mass that turns into the space (vacuum energy) and in a manner whereby the so called Cosmological Constant is in reality the Cosmological Non-Constant, offering itself up as varying degrees of the vacuum, and based on rate of travel (CIG Theory in a nut shell).

    The black hole (mass) becomes the vacuum energy (spacetime) as it reaches "c" [know the MTS equation]. Recall that CIG combines the mass-energy equation with spacetime. It states that the gravitational field, or different density field(s) of spacetime, become(s) the particle(s). In this manner, CIG offers itself up as a solution to Quantum Gravity (on top of its other wild and outlandish predictions/claims).

    So, in my lack of understanding how the CCP values became to be, can someone who knows this stuff forwards and backwards apply CIG Theory (by now someone should understand CIG), and see if this resolves the "worst prediction ever made"? Or, please direct me to a simple (if there is one) explanation of CCP so I can look at the variables and their conceptual real world realities, and attempt to apply CIG myself.

    120 orders of magnitude is a lot of maple syrup!

    THX and why is it I appear to be talking to myself again?

    Does anyone believe in my night sky? Does anyone see the sky I see, I saw last night?

    With little more than a hunch, I am on record that CIG Theory resolves the CCP (Galileo's scientific method meticulously applied!). Hunch to scientific fact in a sentence.

    www.CIGTheory.com: Also great with French Toast

    But not too toasted...

    doug

    HW: Learn the MTS equation and post here a brief (one or two sentence) summary as to your understanding. Extra credit: apply CIG to CCP

    • [deleted]

    Hello There,

    OK then:

    CIG Theory predicts that if there is an electrical discharge the likes of lightening, the mass of the costituent photons (before they became photons) has turned into space, since mass at high rates turns spatial (CIG in a nutshell).

    Then there should be an increase of a new spatial volume, which displaces the surrounding environment, at a very high speed.

    That is thunder!

    doug

      The Reason for a Discrepancy Cosmological Constants (An Observation Vs. Theory)

      http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0191

      • [deleted]

      Thank you.

      2 months later
      • [deleted]

      BAEZ' VERY INTERESTING CATIGORIFICATION OF PHYICS SEEMS TO FOLLOW ON EDWARD MACKINNON'S CALL FOR AND JACK AND IAN STEWART'S[THE COLLAPSE OF CHAOS: DISCOVERING SIMPLICITY IN A "COMPLEX" WORLD, PENGUIN(1994)] CALL FOR WITHOUT IMPLIMENTATION OF "COMPLI-CITY"(BOTTOM UP MANY TO FEW INDUCTION) AND "SIMPLE-XITY"(TOP-DOWM FEW TO MANY DEDUCTION) BOTH SIMULTANEOUSLY AUTOMATICALLY VIA EDWARD SIEGEL'S[SYMPOSIUM ON FRACTALS..., MRS FALL MEETING, BOSTON(1989)-5-SEMINAL-PAPERS!!!-ATTACHED HEREIN] FUZZYICS=CATEGORYICS=PRAGMATYICS("Son of 'TRIZ'")/CATEGORY-SEMANTICS COGNITION(AKA SYNERGETICS PARADIGM AND DICHOTOMY) ANALYTICS DISCOVERY, IN AND UNIFYING PHYSICS TO "PURE"-MATHEMATICS, OF ARISTOTLE'S "SQUARE-OF-OPPOSITION" WITH PLATO'S "FORMS" AND HEGEL'S "BECOMING" BY A SYNTHESIS OF WILLIAM LAWVERE CATEGORY-THEORY/TOPOI WITH KARL MENGER[DIMENSIONTHEORIE, TEUBNER (1929] WITH WIERZBICKA-LANGACKER-LAKOFF COGNITIVE-SEMANTICS WITH PAWLAK-ZIARKO-SLOWINSKI ROUGH-SETS THEORY.

      SIEGEL'S RESULT IS A (2+1)-DIMENSIONAL MATRIX(LOOKING LIKE A TIC-TAC-TOE DIAGRAM) OF SYNONYMS/FUNCTORS VERSUS ANTONYMS/MORPHISMS VERSUS ANALOGY/METAPHOR.

      AMAZINGLY NEUROIMAGING SCIENTIST JAN WEDEEN(HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL) RECENTLY DISCOVERED THIS EXACT STRUCTURE IN HUMAN BRAIN IMAGING!!!

      SIEGEL'S FUZZYICS=CATEGORYICS=PRAGMATYICS("Son of 'TRIZ'")/CATEGORY-SEMANTICS COGNITION(AKA SYNERGETICS PARADIGM AND DICHOTOMY)ANALYTICS, BY PARSIMONY ELIMINATION VIA DISAMBIGUATION OF JARGONIAL-OBFUSCATION("LOTSS FANCY SHMANCY LINGO TO SNOW THE RUBES")THUS PROGRESSES UP THE STIKELEATHER "HIERARCHY-OF-THINKING"(HoT)WHERE EACH LOGIC-LEVEL IS META VIA "MINING" THE NEXT-LOWEST LOGIC-LEVEL:

      DATA -> INFORMATION -> KNOWLEDGE -> UNDERSTANDING -> MEANING -> WISDOM -> INSPIRATION -> "SPIRITUALITY" -> UNIVERSALITY -> SIMPLICITY ->??? EVOLVING TO VIA PHILOSOPHY OF PARSIMONY TO "K.I.S.S.(KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPIDS)!!!Attachment #1: GENERIC_ONLY_S.P.D.FUZZYICSCATEGORYICSCATEGORY-SEMANTICS_COGNITION.docx

      • [deleted]

      BAEZ' VERY INTERESTING CATIGORIFICATION OF PHYSICS SEEMS TO FOLLOW ON EDWARD MACKINNON'S CALL FOR AND JACK AND IAN STEWART'S[THE COLLAPSE OF CHAOS: DISCOVERING SIMPLICITY IN A "COMPLEX" WORLD, PENGUIN(1994)] CALL FOR WITHOUT IMPLIMENTATION OF "COMPLI-CITY"(BOTTOM UP MANY TO FEW INDUCTION) AND "SIMPLE-XITY"(TOP-DOWM FEW TO MANY DEDUCTION) BOTH SIMULTANEOUSLY AUTOMATICALLY VIA EDWARD SIEGEL'S[SYMPOSIUM ON FRACTALS..., MRS FALL MEETING, BOSTON(1989)-5-SEMINAL-PAPERS!!!-ATTACHED HEREIN] FUZZYICS=CATEGORYICS=PRAGMATYICS("Son of 'TRIZ'")/CATEGORY-SEMANTICS COGNITION(AKA SYNERGETICS PARADIGM AND DICHOTOMY) ANALYTICS DISCOVERY, IN AND UNIFYING PHYSICS TO "PURE"-MATHEMATICS, OF ARISTOTLE'S "SQUARE-OF-OPPOSITION" WITH PLATO'S "FORMS" AND HEGEL'S "BECOMING" BY A SYNTHESIS OF WILLIAM LAWVERE CATEGORY-THEORY/TOPOI WITH KARL MENGER[DIMENSIONTHEORIE, TEUBNER (1929] WITH WIERZBICKA-LANGACKER-LAKOFF COGNITIVE-SEMANTICS WITH PAWLAK-ZIARKO-SLOWINSKI ROUGH-SETS THEORY.

      SIEGEL'S RESULT IS A (2+1)-DIMENSIONAL MATRIX(LOOKING LIKE A TIC-TAC-TOE DIAGRAM) OF SYNONYMS/FUNCTORS VERSUS ANTONYMS/MORPHISMS VERSUS ANALOGY/METAPHOR.

      AMAZINGLY NEUROIMAGING SCIENTIST JAN WEDEEN(HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL) RECENTLY DISCOVERED THIS EXACT STRUCTURE IN HUMAN BRAIN IMAGING!!!

      SIEGEL'S FUZZYICS=CATEGORYICS=PRAGMATYICS("Son of 'TRIZ'")/CATEGORY-SEMANTICS COGNITION(AKA SYNERGETICS PARADIGM AND DICHOTOMY)ANALYTICS, BY PARSIMONY ELIMINATION VIA DISAMBIGUATION OF JARGONIAL-OBFUSCATION("LOTSS FANCY SHMANCY LINGO TO SNOW THE RUBES")THUS PROGRESSES UP THE STIKELEATHER "HIERARCHY-OF-THINKING"(HoT)WHERE EACH LOGIC-LEVEL IS META VIA "MINING" THE NEXT-LOWEST LOGIC-LEVEL:

      DATA -> INFORMATION -> KNOWLEDGE -> UNDERSTANDING -> MEANING -> WISDOM -> INSPIRATION -> "SPIRITUALITY" -> UNIVERSALITY -> SIMPLICITY ->??? EVOLVING TO VIA PHILOSOPHY OF PARSIMONY TO "K.I.S.S.(KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPIDS)!!!Attachment #1: 2_GENERIC_ONLY_S.P.D.FUZZYICSCATEGORYICSCATEGORY-SEMANTICS_COGNITION.docxAttachment #2: P_NOTNP_SIEGEL-CLAY-MENGER-ROTA-EUCLID_PROOF_IN_IEEE_2-COLUMN_FORMAT.pdf

      Write a Reply...