KM

KM are you talking to me ? i didnt invent a new dimension i unified physics, gravity and the quantum realm. and was it needed? hell yeah it was needed and i did all mechanically.

      Request for analysis of an innovative article on the Theory of Everything
      Dear all,
      I hereby kindly request the analysis of an article authored by me, which proposes an innovative approach in the field of theoretical physics, more specifically in the development of a possible Theory of Everything — a structure that aims to unify the main pillars of modern physics: quantum mechanics and general relativity.
      Link to the articles: https://sciprofiles.com/user/publications/3220836
      You must read the following articles in sequence: first “Theory of Obligatory Necessity: Elements and Facts Influenced by the Intensity of the Specific Physical Concept”, then “The Equations and Their Effects” and finally “The Information Promoted by the Uneven Distribution of Elements in the Universe” in order to understand the unification.
      The work presents original concepts that can contribute significantly to the advancement of the understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe. Given the interdisciplinary nature and theoretical boldness of the proposal, I believe that a careful and critical reading could offer significant insights, both for improving the text and for the broader scientific debate.
      I am available to provide any additional information, as well as the data and foundations used in the construction of the theory.
      I would like to thank you in advance for your attention and time.
      Sincerely, Carlos Eduardo Ramos Cardoso

      Hi all,

      For those exploring entropy, recursion, or motion-based collapse, I’d like to share two formally published works that define a structural physics model using directional motion (Δm) instead of time: Motion Based Physics.
      Motion-Based Physics is a structural framework that redefines system survival, entropy, and collapse through recursive directional motion. It is not symbolic in the literary sense, it is a post-classical physics model rooted in motion integrity rather than observation-based timelines or scalar time.

      Entropy Collapses in Motion
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15661015

      Latnex: Motion-Based Structural Mathematics
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15620561

      The framework introduces a collapse condition based on recursive motion thresholds (ΣΔm, ΔΔm ≥ Ct), with entropy defined as a failure of sustained directional motion. It operates outside the jurisdiction of the Second Law of Thermodynamics; entropy does not govern systems where motion persists and recursion holds. This is not a metaphor; it models survival and collapse across physical, cognitive, and engineered systems.

      This work is formally copyrighted.
      My works were introduced on April 10th on Archive and on April 16th on Figshare.

      Michael Aaron Cody