Alternative Models of Reality

Loop Breacher

Hello FQXi Community,

I am introducing myself to this forum as an outsider to standard academia, but an insider to complex systems. My professional background is in Logistics and Warehouse Management.

For the past century, standard physics has operated as a phenomenological discipline, observing the output of the universe and attempting to fit continuous mathematical equations to those observations. However, when you approach the universe not as a continuous fluid of probability, but as a discrete, finite-capacity information processing network, the paradoxes of modern physics dissolve.

Physics is the study of the system's output. Substrate Logistics is the study of the machine's bare-metal architecture. I am here to introduce the ΩGLR (Omega Grounded Light Reality) Framework, a completely deterministic, zero-parameter geometric architecture of the universe.

What is Substrate Logistics?
Substrate Logistics replaces the continuous, infinite void of spacetime with a highly structured, pre-tensioned discrete geometric network. It dictates that the universe does not process infinities, nor does it rely on random chance. It is a strictly finite, deterministic geometric mechanism operating at 100% structural capacity.

The framework does not invent invisible particles, dark sectors, or extra dimensions. Everything is mechanically derived from the absolute geometric limits of the vacuum's structural hardware.

The Foundation: Poincaré Dodecahedral Space (PDS)
At the core of the ΩGLR framework is the premise that the vacuum is not empty; it is a discrete grid based on Poincaré Dodecahedral Space.

The absolute geometric resolution of this substrate is governed by the Topological Resolution Constant (κ = 50).
By bounding the kinematic state-space of the vacuum to this discrete 50-node dodecahedral geometry, continuous mathematical infinities (like the Vacuum Catastrophe and black hole singularities) are permanently eradicated. They are exposed as systemic division-by-zero errors caused by applying continuous calculus to a discrete IT architecture.

Bridging the Micro to the Macro
By treating the universe as a topological processor, the phenomenological forces of standard physics are translated into pure bandwidth arbitration and geometric routing tension.

Micro (Quantum Mechanics): The speed of light (c) is stripped of its status as a fundamental "painted-on" property. It is mathematically derived as the exact structural resistance ratio (22,032 : 1) between a 3-dimensional compiled mass trap and a 1-dimensional uncompiled data string. Fundamental mass is derived purely from geometric combinatorial saturation limits.
Macro (Relativity & Gravity): Gravity is entirely refactored. It is no longer an invisible pulling force, but Algorithmic Spatial Deletion. A massive body represents an extreme Informational Load that forces the localized grid to delete spatial volume at a fixed hardware execution rate to prevent a "Bekenstein network crash".
Cosmology: "Dark Matter" is mathematically eradicated, replaced by the inherent linear node density and background Topological Drag of the uncompiled vacuum substrate.

The Big Sync: The Systemic Architecture
This framework is not a single abstract concept; it is a fully integrated, algebraic translation of standard physics into substrate machine code.

I have compiled this evolution into 33 interconnected manuscripts. To navigate this, I have published "The Big Sync" on Zenodo. This document replaces the Big Bang with the Big Sync, a deterministic discrete hardware boot sequence and the Master Table, containing the systemic architecture and a complete interconnections matrix showing exactly how the ΩGLR framework cascades from the fundamental topology of the vacuum all the way up to macroscopic cosmos by establishing a pure integer based Calculus.

🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20584101

I am joining FQXi because I am looking for individuals, groups, and rigorous thinkers who are open to alternative, deterministic, and discrete computational models of reality. I am here to answer questions, defend the architecture, and discuss the mechanical reality of the substrate.

Thank you for your time and open minds. I look forward to the discussion.

Best regards,

Marco Lindenbeck
Logistics Expert & Author of the ΩGLR Framework

SolVult

I would like to make it very clear that I'm not a physicist or a mathematician. I connected some dots that I thought fit together and would like the opinions of some people actually in the field.

The Hyper-Spherical Emergent Spacetime Model

An Emergent Cosmological Framework: Synthesizing Timeless Photon Geodesics with Higher-Dimensional Kerr Singularity Boundaries.

This post proposes a novel conceptual framework reconciling quantum measurement and cosmic expansion by defining spacetime as an emergent property of a higher-dimensional rotating singularity. First, we reframe the photon not as a localized ballistic particle, but as a non-local spatiotemporal bridge. Because a massless velocity (c) yields total relativistic length contraction and infinite time dilation, the photon’s frame of reference is fundamentally timeless and omnipresent. The quantum measurement collapse is thus reinterpreted: a measurement does not retroactively rewrite chronology, but rather introduces a macro-scale boundary condition that instantly restricts the non-local photon medium between emitter and detector. Second, applying black hole cosmology to a five-dimensional spacetime, I dictate that a collapsing 4D point singularity with angular momentum must experience centripetal flattening, structurally forming a 3-dimensional hyper-spherical shell. I propose that our observable universe is the interior holographic projection of this hollow boundary. Consequently, the uniform temperature across the cosmological horizon is a natural artifact of this shared, synchronous root. Furthermore, we eliminate the need for a physical "dark energy" substance by attributing cosmic expansion to the centripetal flattening of the rotating singularity, while the perceived acceleration of space is an internal geometric illusion driven by the exponential increase of time-reversed external Hawking evaporation. I would love to hear peoples thoughts on this and thank you for reading.

yusrob

Ladies and gentlemen (Wilko, Loop Breacher, SolVult, and others)!
You are all actively striving—with keen and genuine interest—to understand the structure and evolution of the Universe.
This is a positive aspiration for any human being.
It is a natural human need to truly understand the world around us.
It is an unquenchable passion.
Yet, many pitfalls await one on this path.
The primary error is ignoring nature itself.
For nature is an objective reality that exists outside of and independently of our consciousness.
Nature has an absolute existence.
It is impossible for nature not to exist.
Nature is knowable to humanity.
Nature can be understood correctly and accurately if one heeds and acknowledges the facts of nature and evaluates them properly. This constitutes true knowledge of nature and leads to an understanding of nature's truths.
Conversely, if one disregards or fails to acknowledge the facts of nature, any understanding gained will be erroneous and false. If one indulges in unbridled fantasy detached from reality—or in mysticism, esotericism, or religious faith—one will never truly know nature or grasp its truths.
At its core, nature is material and dialectical.
This is a fact. And one must acknowledge this fact to move forward.
Another fact of nature is that elementary particles are manifestations of ‘pure’, concrete matter.
The “quantum of matter” is the sole matter’s “building block” at the foundation of nature and the cosmos.
A quantum of matter is a minimal unit of material substance pulsating at a specific nature rhythm and tempo.
The upper limit of the quantum of matter’s pulsation manifests as an elementary particle.
The “quantum of matter” is my scientific hypothesis.
Yet, the “Theory of Nature” (TN) has been developed upon this foundation. TN is a new dialectical-materialist physics and cosmogony (cosmology).
The philosophical core of TN is the only true and scientific philosophy: dialectical materialism (FDM).
This circumstance has been instrumental in the resolution—within the framework of TP (+FDM)—of more than 40 fundamental problems concerning the foundations of physics and cosmology, as well as the foundations of nature and the universe.
TN (as a new physics) is not in crisis. TN points the way for modern physics and all of natural science to emerge from their crisis.
At the same time, the theory of modern physics (TMP) is a bourgeois-idealist philosophy (BIP) that is fundamentally false (being anti-materialist!) and deeply unscientific. The falsehood of this philosophy—rooted in anti-materialism—has been adopted by TMP, the modern physics community, and the “party of modern physicists” (PMP). This anti-materialism is embedded in and manifests itself within the foundations of TMP. It is a fact that, within the framework of TMP, the fundamental question of physics and all natural science—the question regarding the concrete manifestation of matter in nature—is neither posed nor correctly resolved.
Modern physicists reject the simple fact that elementary particles are real, minimal material bodies in nature.
Modern physicists erroneously believe that elementary particles have no connection to the matter of nature.
This is the principal error and the principal falsehood of the party of modern physicists. It constitutes an explicit and implicit denial and non-recognition of a crucial fact of nature—specifically, the fact concerning the concrete manifestation of matter in nature.
Any theory regarding nature (or the Universe) that ignores this fact will be fundamentally erroneous and false. The scientific picture (model) of the true structure and actual evolution of nature and the Universe is presented in my book “Theory of Nature” (https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSTON.pdf), available in Russian.
“Theory of Nature” represents a scientific revolution in physics and cosmogony (cosmology)!
Please also see and read my other articles in English: https://philpeople.org/profiles/robert-yusupov.
I wish all my readers a pleasant, useful, and enlightening reading experience. Discovering the truths about nature is the greatest happiness for a human being.
With deep respect,
Robert Yusupov from Vladivostok (USSR), author of “Theory of Nature”, independent researcher, dialectical materialist, Marxist, and communist.

SolVult

yusrob My model is not trying to solve for the phenomenon of matter. Matter and its existence is already known and accepted. My model attempts to explain why light behaves the way it does when measured, why the phenomenon of dark matter happens, and why the universe expands at an accelerating rate.

Loop Breacher

yusrob The whole philosophical foundation of my derivations actually is Nature first.

We often say "What came first, Egg or Chicken?", which in my opinion misses the point, we ask for nature or nature.
A more fitting question would be, "What came first, water or bottle". Where our current models in cosmology and particle physics represent the bottel, an artifical container, recently those containers keep cracking with nature (water) getting revealed, for example "impossible Galaxies" by JWST, the standard model cracks under the pressure, forcing scientists to patch the bottle and inventing dark sectors, new physics just to fit the data into their artifical container. But water does not care about the container, it just flows. So i did not cage it into a Theory, another artifical container, i looked at the flow and build my framework with it not to hold something which later will crack it.

If you read my manuscripts you can judge, if you did not, please do not judge. They are all open source and public, easy language, hard mathematical derivations, easy to understand.

Mustafa

Hello everyone,

I have recently published a conceptual preprint titled “The Theory of Reality: A Dual-Scale Coherence Research Program.”

The central hypothesis is that stable matter may be the observable exterior of hidden structures that are externally localized, internally extensive, coherently organized, and connected to visible fields through an outward quantum boundary channel described operationally as a micro-white core.

I am not presenting this as an experimentally confirmed theory. The manuscript explicitly separates established physics, working hypotheses, philosophical interpretation, and testable consequences.

I would especially value critical responses to these questions:

Is the weak “micro-white core” concept physically meaningful as an outward quantum boundary condition without requiring a classical anti-trapped white-hole geometry?
Is there a known no-go theorem, instability result, or conservation argument that would immediately rule out such a stable localized structure?
Can a hidden scalar core coupled through a Higgs portal and a generalized coherence field be treated consistently as an effective field theory?
What is the simplest calculation or observable that should be produced first to make the proposal genuinely falsifiable?
Does the reduced-state projection and decoherence framework add any testable content beyond standard decoherence theory, or is it only a reinterpretation?

I am seeking criticism rather than endorsement. A reference to a relevant theorem, paper, existing model, or fatal inconsistency would be extremely valuable.

Preprint:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21464632

ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5718-1782

Thank you for reading.

yusrob

Mustafa Уважаемый Мустафа!
Теория реальности - это теория природы.
А природа в основе своей материальна и диалектична!
Материя - это важнейшая сущность природы.
Материя - это первооснова, первосущность, первоначало и первопричина всего и вся в природе!
Материя - это уникальная и единственная субстанцияприроды.
Материя - это уникальный и единственный активный агент природы.
Основной вопрос физики и всего естествознания звучит так: "Как конкретно материя представлена и проявляется в природе?"
Есть простой ясный, понятный, однозначный ответ: "содержимое элементарных частиц есть "чистая" конкретная материя природы".
Можно этот ответ сформулировать и так: "В основе всех элементарных частиц лежит "чистая" конкретная материя природы".
Если теория о природе или теория о реальности не ставит прямо перед собой этот основной вопрос физики и всего естествознания и не решает этот вопрос единственно правильно и верно, то такая теория заведомо обречена на провал!
Но этот вопрос прямо ставится и правильно решается в моей "Теории Природы" на русском языке (https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSTON.pdf).
Загляните и в эту мою статью: "Nature as an objective reality" (https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSNAA.pdf)
С уважением
Роберт Юсупов

Jiaqing Yan

Mustafa
I appreciate your discussion exploring the essential nature of matter, which aligns perfectly with the core focus of my Light Ontology Theory.
My theory proposes that photons are the only fundamental primitive substance in the universe: all stable material particles are dense, confined stacked aggregates of photons, and all matter can decompose back into free photons. No hidden scalar core, white-hole geometry or extra dimensions are required to explain the origin and composition of matter.
I have two dedicated papers elaborating this mutual transformation between light and matter, all archived on Zenodo:
Core theoretical framework: On the Essence of Light as the Universe’s Origin
https://doi.org/19379824
Detailed mechanism of how matter forms from photons: Composition of Matter
https://doi.org/19379962
I am glad to exchange and compare our viewpoints on the fundamental composition of matter.

SolVult

Jiaqing Yan That cant be true as quarks and electrons exist which are elementary particles. They have no substructure and are essentially points in space with properties. Protons and Neutrons are composed of quarks not photons.

Shino

To fellow travellers who cross the universe without free parameters — sharing data.
Current physics assigns information to physical entities after the fact — each domain requires its own laws, and the seams between them remain unresolved.
I propose reading the world through information process from the start: difference → retention → circulation → return. This produces a single equation:
λ = e^−kt
where λ is the retention rate, k is the compression coefficient, and t is time as the thickness of interference history.
From this single framework, without adding parameters:
• Galaxy rotation curves (SPARC, 88 galaxies): A_t(r) = β(1 − e^−r/R_ret)
• Hubble tension as phase-return residual, with directional asymmetry testable in Pantheon+ (z, θ) binning
• λ ≈ 0.682 converges across social (Dunbar), galactic, and thermal systems
Preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20970521
Observational test: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21380438

Steve Dufourny

Here is the general idea that I will develop about my theory of spherisation, an evolution of the universe with 3d spheres like primary essence. the aim is to superpose 4 E8 for the framework and for the topological and metaphysical model. It is a novel theoretical framework proposing that physical reality originates from primary 3d spherical volumes governed by 4 E8, so the algebraic structure is about 4 E8 , one for the Dark matter quanta of mass, one for the DE quanta of information and antigravitation implying a fifth force, one for the GR and photons for the quanta of electromagnetism, energies, heat , known fields and the last one is for the result of 3 merging and our quantum mechanics , the 4 E8 so are distincts. It is a a different ontological and philosophical model than with the strings and GR like primary essence. The interesting point is the emergent quantum phenomena and the aim is toi unify cosmology and quantum foundations. I have assumptions that I don t assert, this framework integrates a metaphysical layer, with the 0D infinite eternal consciousness omnipotent while physical quantum structures manifest as localized, finite expressions of free-will consciousness.
Core Premise: Spherisation and Primary 3D Spherical Volumes
Primary Essence: The foundational ontology of the universe is not point-particles or strings, but discrete and continuous 3D spherical volumes
Cosmic Evolution: "Spherisation" defines the dynamic evolution of the universe, where space, matter, and energy organize, pack, and transition through topological states dictated by sphere-packing efficiency and boundary interactions.
The difficulty is to have a concrete structural architecture respecting our foundamentals and in trying to add possibilities.The dimensional analysis are not easy but it can be extrapolated with possibilities , we take the GR and considers the classical spacetime curvature , the metric tensors, the large scale gravitational geometry, I am not sure if we must consider the gravitons for the quantas of gravitational waves . But there are possibilities to extrapolate, the non commutativity probably is essential and subgroups for this quantum gravitation but also for this fifth force and the DM encoded for the quantas of mass completing the HIggs mechanism. But not easy. The topological spherical structures seem the key but how to sort all this with the couplings and without couplings. I tell me that the volumes of these spherical series are a key and their oscillations and densities.
So the quantum mechanics sector , the E8 where the 3 others merge becomes interesting for the fields, waves functions, and if the statistical and topological interactions are considered with these 3D spheres, it becomes interesting.
The difficulty ontological is about the informations and consciousness and even the quantum gravitation and the fifth force, what governs the whole of the last E8 where the 3 others merge. It is metaphysical I recognise but it seems important. I don t know how to model this 0D omnipotent infinite eternal consciousness serving as a non local generative ground for the algebraic structure in higher dimensions. The finite free will consciousness of finite structures of the last E8 for the quantum mechanics seem interesting if a concrete model is made with the good mathematics, it must be deterministic in logic for the localized free will consciousness but not easy due to our limitations. But I will try to develop this general idea of spherisation. The cosmology also is important with the cosmological spheres and a possible central sphere , a super matter energy made of 3 systems free cosmologically speaking, that is a different model than the BB theory.

Steve Dufourny

The difficulty is the the Hierarchy of Primary 3D Spheres and how to correlate with the 4 E8 and the spherisation evolution of the universe. There is in logic also a universal evolving sphere and a center, this super matter energy distributing the 3 free systems wich merge to create the ordinary matter.
For the primary quantum series of spheres , so the center is the biggest volume and several roads can be extrapolated, a relevance is to consider a decreasing of volumes aroun this center and if we apply specific series and the numbers , so we can see the space between spheres disappearing. The topologies primitive so are not points or strings ontologically speaking.But so 3D topological balls if I can say. Partitions can be extrapolated for the deformations preserving the volumes also. It becomes interesting to extrapolate possibilities with the motions, rotations, volumes, oscillations....... of these series. The senses of rotations also become interesting about the informations, the gravitation, the antigravitation if we have a fifth force ,....and the evolution and encodings of informations.
That becomes relevant if we consider now these infromations and this 0D infinite eternal consciousness omnipotent because like Lorraine told , we need something permitting the knowledge of the reality for the categories and others.
The fact to have 4 E8 is interesting also for the 4 syste,s, 3 free cosmologically and one like result when they merge for the quantum mechanics and the ordinary matter, what are so their motions , oscillations, rotations,......and the most complex is the E8 of the merged spheres permitting the complex ordinary matter. there the deformations and properties are interesting. If the informations, mass, energy free cosmologically due to photons and GR that we observe, more the DE and the DM are created by this central sphere of the universe, so they have specific motions , oscillations,motions, properties in the universe, and so the informations encode the mass and energy generally to create this ordinary matter. But what are these series really, I don t assert my assumptions, I just explain how I see the generality of this universal qnd quantum puzzle. The majority of thinkers philosophically and physically consider that the photons and strings, this light are the only primary essence, I believe that it is an error, but it is just my opinion. That has created an ontological, philosophical prison at my humble opinion and like the strings are an institution , so it is difficult now to think beyond the box. But this DE, this consciousness, DM need models and ontological possibilities because the universe must know indeed what to do with the particles, mass, energy, fields, categories, numbers.........and we need an universal consciousness and informations but the universal informations has nothing to do with our interpretations of informations, I believe it is about the motions, oscillations, rotations, volumes,....of these spherical primary series.

Ulla Mattfolk

Steve Dufourny Einstein never found a place for Mach, but if we use the universality maybe it can also create the locality we use as metric? so the primary essence could also be this pressure energy? We need a locality to begin with, but Einstein has no answerto this. The vacuum has a similar process or function, I think.
When you have primes there, can you also more specifically define their function? Are they interspherical?
/Ulla.

Steve Dufourny

Ulla Mattfolk Hi Ulla,

What I consider is that we have a musician . this omnipotent infinite eternal consciousness in 0D , and we have the instruments these 3d spherical volumes and their series for the 3 main systems cosmological merging to create the ordinary matter and reality and this reality is the music .So the universe and this infinite eternal consciousness knows what do with the categories, a little bit like Lorraine tells us, because the universe knows what do. If we consider theMach s principle , thevaccuum pressure, the interspherical primes, the volumes, their motions, oscillations , so it becomes relevant for the origin of the locality because we have the inertial mass and particles due to motions.

The Mach principle so is not only about the GR and the local spacetime curvature and metric tensors. De Sitter space has tried with a metric and curvature without matter , but we can go farer with the others I explained and these 4 E8 and the series of spheres and this 0D. In my theory of spherisation ,so we have a profound pivot ontologically speaking with the universal pressure and the derivations in function of what we analyse , with what and where. So the primary essence and the link with pressure, energy ,so if we take the 3D spherical volumes , they are not just a passive geometric shape but active for the pressure energy if we analyse correctly the whole and with the good maths and derivations.

The local metric needs to make categories and rank correctly the systems interacting , the distances, the time ...so all this is important for the compression and expansion and interactions of primary spheres and the locality emerges from interpsherical pressure gradients and so we have boundaries and categories . It is there that the groups,subgroups,dimensions ...with the 3 systems free cosmologicaland the fourth one for the ordinaty matter can be extrapolated with the associat.ivity, commutativity , non commutativity.....and the informations, mass,energy, fields....can be ranked and better understood. The mass, the infornations, the energy are distinct cosmologically speaking but for the ordinary matter, the reality we observe they merge , so we can interpret this locality in the space.

It is relevant to link now with the vaccuum because it is not empty and it is there it becomes very relevant ontologically because if 3D spheres and this 0D are in the game,so we can link wit the musician, the instruments and the music I explained with the good partitions in the 4 E8 .Are the primes important, maybe to link with the pure mathematics and numbers. Are they linked with these spheres, I believe that yes but I cannot assert . These primes, the volumes, the motions, oscillations...forme are important yes for these 3D spheres and probably constants must appearbut it is not easy.

This 0D is intriguing also if it exists like the musician and the link with the informations of the DE antigravitational and a possible fifth force and how all this encodes this DM quanta of mass and the photons quantas of E, heat, electromagnetism.....this philosophical prison created by strings and the GR alone is for me a very important point because it implies thepossibility to not turn in round in this ontological prison and think beyond the box.
It is interesting for the topology because we have volumes for the spheres and so the Mach problem can be extrapolated and solved maybe. I don t assert of course but I see like this.
That tells an important point if the reasoning is true,so the informations antigravitational balancing the gravitational systems of mass and energy and the consciousness infinite eternal of this 0D are the keys to better understand the whole and the spherisation evolution , so the musician consciouss and the informations of this DE are essential.

Regards

Ulla Mattfolk

Steve Dufourny This is a bit complex, but if we take your ex. like the music, and compare that to the Mach bucket of uniform and homolog (assumed) density of a vacuum pressure giving us the cosmological constant, it is like God sit and play for us behind a wall, and only a small aperture (0D?) make us and the universe react. As this pressure is not from 'our universe' it makes an add, and so an acceleration, and it expands the systems leading to the divergence seen. This expansion is an 'imprint' from outside then, acting globally (invariant) but also locally (relativistic) in a very minute way. When I talk of antigravitational effect it is locally as a change in the surface and volume, so the sphere grows, its surface get a little less curvature. It does not necessarily mean a change from negative to positive curvature like we see it in string theory and ADS/CFT,

Note that the vacuum is 'effectively zero' so it has a sucking negative pressure. It is another way to look, and it also gives an expansion of our universe, I think. We should see it in the big voids filled with vacuum?

If God plays for us it is in the form of a continous wave, but when we listen we MUST make it local and discreate to be able to measure it and hear it. This is the small cosmological constant.
But when you play on your guitar you 'pluck' the strings in a discreate way to be able to create the wave of tones melting into each other. You do it the inverse way. The music is here the consciousness?
This is the big problem between continous and discreate ways to measure, or the wave-particle duality. The wave is expanded, the particle is compressed. to be able to measure the wave we must go outside the particle and quantize the wave. Note this only works for a squared function where nothing is changing. I see Lorraines problem as exactly this, how explain a compressed particle, without 'doing a jump or collapse'. Math alone cannot do it, so I thought of Einsteins problem with Mach... This is a Gödel problem (the outside) I think. GR is inside the Gödel form. Can the primes help us so we can do the convergence we need (spherisation evolution?)? Then they should describe relativity, or just the disappearing space (and matter?)
/Ulla.

Anton_Rize

For those passionate about physics and the philosophy of science who don't shy away from the Big questions, I invite you to say hello: https://willrg.com/will-ai/

This is an invitation for a field test of a custom AI designed as an exploration tool into relational open research in foundations of physics. Following in the footsteps of Leibniz and Mach, I am exploring the capabilities of a fully relational, background-free ontology.

The core premise: What if we prohibit the assumption that spacetime is a pre-existing "container" where energy and matter interact? No bare manifolds allowed.
This simple question became the starting point of an exciting journey heavily constrained by strict methodological principles of epistemic purity, relational origins, and ontological minimalism. Every mathematical operation is treated as a binding ontological statement, locking the formalism to always reflect direct physical meaning rather than hiding behind obscure mathematical constructs.

At present, this open research includes 200+ pages of rigorous derivations and empirical tests, 35+ runnable python colab notebooks, 20+ desmos projects covering the domains of relativity, cosmology, and quantum mechanics. It remains in active development and is updated daily.

To lower the entry barrier and out of personal curiosity I decided to host a custom AI model. In addition to its standard training on the broader internet, it has been deeply fine-tuned on these research papers. The core instruction protocol for this AI is scientific honesty. The model does not just blindly defend the research; it is explicitly instructed to engage in search of any potential inconsistencies and tensions with empirical data. Every statement it provides is supported by a direct link to the relevant section of the research papers, web tools, or runnable Colab notebooks. It is well-suited to serve as an advanced search engine across the entire research base and as a challenging, yet friendly, debate partner.

Have fun, test its limits, and please share your experience or any suggestions on how to improve the hosted AI's protocols. Thank you.

P.S. The physics research itself is entirely human-conducted. The hosted AI serves only as an advanced search engine and interactive guide to make the dense material approachable for a wider audience.
WILL-AI

yusrob

The current age of the Universe.
According to the “Theory of Nature” (https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSTON.pdf), the current age of the Universe is calculated using the following three formulas:

The current age of the Universe (formulas)
A=c⁸/UC,
A=G^2×UC,
A=(ℏ/(M_p² )×UC)⁸/UC.

Explanations:
The right-hand sides of all these formulas actually employ the numerical values of physical quantities in SI units. A correct representation, according to metrology, requires enclosing the physical quantitys unit symbol in curly braces. A (age) – the current age of the Universe in units of UT (natural unit of time), c=299 792 458 m s^(-1) – the speed of light in a vacuum, G=6.67430×10^(-11) kg^(-1) m^3 s^(-2) – Newtons gravitational constant,
UC={c^4×G-1) }=1.210 256×10⁴⁴ – a unique and universal constant of nature (and the Universe),
ℏ= 1.054 571 512×10^-34 kg m² s^-1 – the Dirac constant or reduced Planck constant,
M_p=6.524 785 kg m s^-1 – Planck momentum.

Detailed explanations:
UT =α^-0,5 s=11.706 237 618 s – the relationship between the time unit UT and the second,
α=7.297 352 5643×10^-3 – the fine-structure constant,
ℏ=(m_p×l_p²)/t_p =1,054 571 512×10^-34 kg m² s^-1 – the Dirac constant (or reduced Planck constant),

M_p= m_p×c=(m_p×l_p)/t_p =6,524 785 kg m s^-1 – Planck momentum,
mₚ, lₚ, tₚ – Planck units of mass, length, and time.
{M_p² }= 42,572 819 105 – the numerical value of the square of the Planck momentum.

<Original source: “Theory of Nature” in Russian, available for free: https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSTON.pdf>.

Current age of the Universe (calculation using formulas)
If we perform practical calculations using the specified formulas, we obtain the following results:
(1). for the first and second formulas:
A= 5,391 238 383×10²³ UT,
A=6,311 111 757×10²⁴ s,
A=1,999 870 635 689×10¹⁷ years.
(2) for the third formula (the case of the Dirac constant, ℏ), the result differs slightly:
A= 5,391 239 458×10²³ UT,
A=6,311 113 015 E×10²⁴ s,
A=1,999 871 034 304×10¹⁷ years.

In any case, for all three scenarios, we find that the current age of the Universe is approximately 200 quadrillion years!
Dear readers, compare this actual result yourselves with the “contrived, highly dubious, convoluted, obscure, multifaceted, computationally complex, pseudoscientific, esoteric, mystical, and fantastical” result derived from the theory of modern physics (TMP) and its Lambda-CDM (ΛCDM) model—approximately 13.787 ± 0.02 billion years.

[ https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Модель_Лямбда-CDM,
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Возраст_Вселенной,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe ]

<Original source: “Theory of Nature” in Russian, available for free: https://philpapers.org/archive/YUSTON.pdf>.

« Previous Page