.
.
.
.
.
There is no unification of physics, unless every property of observable physics has the potential of simultaneously and inclusively being modeled in a common system to include: instantaneous qualities of quantum entanglement, decoherence, duality, fringe patterns, gravity, electro-magnetism, forces, red shift, subatomic particles, dark energy, alternate dimensional spaces, ... everything.
Here is my stab at an all inclusive model using an alternate method that potentially allows for the separation of time and space; i.e. warping space/time relationships.
Axiom of Choice potentially defines the causal limits of which mathematics can be defined.
Using an extension of Axiom of Choice, proposed is a method to model relativity to define the causal limits of physics; non-relativistic quantum causality.
"Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0041v1.pdf
Sub-atomic particles are formed from causal interactions of adjacency to causal singularities (physics constants) that produce localization of causal influence as discrete aliasing of quantum event interrelated systems. As an inadequate visualization, similar to crystal growth forming in a causal media moderated as a consequence of distributed impurities (singularities).
Proposed is that a quantum entanglement is the result of two similar vast systems of causality that differ by one or a few causal states.
Present quantum computers are relativistic, and therefore operate as similar vast systems of synchronized quantum causality, and NOT the more fundamental form of non-relativistic quantum causality. This fundamentally models an explanation for decoherence.
I've kept my compendium of relationships considered. But realized that if we do learn to manipulate space/time relationships, who is going to have control over those tools? Who will be excluded from having access to these tools? Who will decide what the tools will be used for? Who will decide who lives and dies in the Universe?
Presently, the majority of Americans have significant issues with Common Sense, let alone correlating vast systems to predict consequences for a thousand years. Professors until now have not been able to define nor teach common sense.
Common Sense = Self-esteem(group related skills) Logic Predicting Consequences
Activists until now have not been able to usefully define Corruption.
Corruption = unethical/illegal allocation of resources and/or opportunities
So with these relationships we can now work to eliminate all corruption to support the broad utilization of space/time manipulation.
Bottom/Up method to weaken corruption through the broad Teaching of Common Sense
http://www.UA-KiTS.com
and to build the economic structures to support broad physics research and related experimentation.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0021v1.pdf
We do NOT have a system to monitor for and eliminate ALL corruption.
Top/Down method to detect and eliminate all corruption; simultaneously Maximizing Freedoms AND Maximizing Security, not have one at the expense of the other
http://eliminate-all-corruption.pbworks.com
Everyone should be allowed to own a nuclear weapon (manipulate space/time) if they maintain the proper safety protocols. But with a tool to rip open the fabric of space, we need organized vigilance against human error and lack of broadly considered judgement.
Hoping that the technologies developed will be used peaceably is irrational.
http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/MTO/Programs/Quantum_Entanglement_Science_and_Technology_(QUEST).aspx
The military is making billions of dollars available for research leading to products utilizing quantum entanglement which is a form of space/time manipulation; i.e. instantaneous.
In a causal system, speed is a moderated product of space/time. Anything not related to space, or not related to time, or neither related to space nor time, is instantaneous. Or more accurately, non-relativistic, not of observable physics.
.
.
.
.
.
.