Alternative Models of Reality

James Putnam

"Hopefully, our James A. Putnam will also at least flexibilize his opinion concerning allegedly proven time dilution."

You are not reading what I write. I did not say that Time dilation was proven. Time does not dilate. What I say is that the effect called time-dilation is real. The effect does not involve anything other than changes in the rates of object activity. There has never been any experimentation upon either space or time. There has never been empirical evidence for space or time causing effects or suffering effects. The 't' in physics equations has never represented time. It has always represented a measure of object activity. The unit for 'time', the second, is not a unit of time. It is what it is designed to be, a unit of object activity.

Steve Dufourny

QUANTUM COMPUTE............... Sphères of Bloch ....spherical volumes..........qubits........superimposings ,sortings, synchronisations................

kurt stocklmeir

Around 1990 I said time particles and space particles are spin 1 tachyons. The negative energy of time and space decrease mass of positive energy particles. Time and space have negative energy - time and space around mass makes particles move away from mass it helps to create inertia it fights against gravity. Gravitons create gravity. Gravitons are not gravity waves. I said all forces are spin 1 tachyons. They slow down as they go through time space and the vacuum all forces get more strong as they travel. Gravity gets more strong as it travels there is not any dark matter. I said gravity and quantum mechanics work together - this can stop attraction created by gravity - big tidal forces make particles have a big wave length - because of quantum mechanics particles slow down as wave length increases - there are stars a lot like a black hole - they are the most cold parts of the universe - particles almost do not move - if star spins this makes star more cold - particles can move away from star a lot like super fluid going up surface - magnetic fields can help this - make jets. There are not any black holes. For years I have talked about this - kill cancer - give photoactive dye to person - send particles like protons and ions through person - particles hit photoactive dye excited state kill cancer - it could be true this can save almost any person who gets cancer.

Kurt Stocklmeir

Steve Dufourny

Hello Mr Stocklmeir,

I iked your line of resoning.That said if I can,gravitons and tachyons are bosons.So they are relativistic.If gravitation is speeder than c ,so this force cannot be an emergent electromagnetic force.Of course it is just my opinion,but in logic it is important.This standard model is not complete and we search this quantum weakest force.I beleive strongly that this force must be considered differently.In logic dark matter not baryonic could answer and the Black holes also.If the waves of gravitation are speeder,so we can consider a different logic than our thermo and electromagnetism.You spoke about the cold, could you enroll please a little about this cold.I beleive that probably this gravitation and this zeo absolue could answer but Iam not sure of course for the thermodynamical equilibrium.This gravitation seems encircling the standard model at all scales.

Best Regards

kurt stocklmeir

Steve

I said stars a lot like a black hole are the most cold parts of the universe. Gravity and quantum mechanics can work together to make gravity stop working. Using quantum mechanics as wave length increases of a particle the speed of a particle decreases. Big tidal forces around a star a lot like a black hole will make particles have a big wave length and particles will have a decrease of speed - particles almost will not move. Particles will not get to the center of the star. There are not any black holes. The particles around the center of the star will have a low temperature because temperature is associated with speed of particles. The particles around the center of the star will be a lot like an Einstein Bose condensate and a super fluid - these particles can do a lot of things. It could be true magnetic fields of the star can make the particles move away from the star a lot like a super fluid goes up a glass - this could make jets around a big star but this star is not a black hole.

Kurt Stocklmeir

Steve Dufourny

You can continue on the same thread with "reply"

I am understanding your ideas.We know few still about the BHS.I consider them not baryonic also like the dark matter.Of course we say that they are Black but it is just due to the fact tat all light is absorbed.I beleive that BH are cosmological sphères of matter not baryonic having several properties,they balance the galaxies, they produce probably particles not baryonic.They recycle the informations probably,they embark galaxies in the rotation around the central BH the biggest BH.Imagine that the cold, the zero absolute is the answer and thAt themro is not sufficient to understand what is gravitation, BH,Dark matter.In a philosophical point of vue, I am doubting that this infinite entropy has created a system with only photons like main informations of evolution and encodings.The puzzle is more complex in fact.I like your idea of superstars,perhaps you could insert this matter not baryonic with a bridge forthis weakest quantum force which is paradoxally the strogest in the same time.This force cannot be bosonic it seems to me.Best Regards

kurt stocklmeir

Steve - I do not like reply because a lot of times I do not go back to old things that I say - I do not want to keep going back to things I say for a long time. If there were black holes think about tidal forces around them - think about quantum mechanics and thermodynamics around them.

Kurt Stocklmeir

Steve Dufourny

It is the problem ,our standard model seems not complete.Quantum mechanics are not complete.Thermo and heat with electromagnetic forces due to photons encoded are not complete.This gravitation seems to be a new kind of force.That said I like the cold in your reasoning.I discussed about this zero absolute on LinkedIn with some friends.But perhaps that the cold is not the answer also.We know so few still about this dark matter and BHs.It seems a new physics but in logic the quantum mechanic is proportional wih many paramters and many constants appear also.Perhaos that simply the 3 motions of 3D sphères can answer for the proportions more the spherical volumes and the mass.It is not easy to find the method to check this matter not baryonic.

kurt stocklmeir

Around 1990 using sci physics I said time and space are negative energy tachyons. Time and space around mass create a force away from mass it helps to create inertia. All forces are spin 1 tachyons. All forces travel a certain distance and disappear - because of this there is not conservation of energy. After gravity disappears time and space around mass creates a small force away from mass. Tidal forces associated with gravity and quantum mechanics make things fall at a different speed - big tidal forces change wave length of particles and this influences speed of particles.

Kurt Stocklmeir

Georgina Woodward

Re. Reality in the context of physics: New simplified and extended diagram showing Object and Image reality and the relations of two futures; unwritten and pre-written, present Now, material past and history/records.Attachment #1: RICP_plus_and_minus_Flat_New_2016.png

Georgina Woodward

This diagram makes clearer the way in which we encounter time. The material events occurring across the sequence of uni-temporal Nows are encoded in emitted/reflected EM potential sensory data (the potential pre-written future). The information, when received and processed becomes the present-now and is then stored as records and or memories called history. The material future (unwritten future) does not exist and nor dues the material past. A non existent material future allows the possibility of true randomness and free will. Persisting configurations of matter are subsumed by the youngest Object universal configuration so are part of uni-temporal Now and not the past. Non existent material past and future prevent time travel. This organisation dispels the paradoxes of relativity. I have written potential pre-written future as it is only after receipt of the information that it can be said it was a pre-written future. Not all information will be received and so pre-written future is a subset of the data pool.Perhaps I should have drawn it so. It will include the subset of information shown as received within the data pool.

Georgina Woodward

Though, I don't think it is quite right to have a set of as yet uncertain contents. There isn't a way to divide up the data into that which will,'at some time', be received and that which will not, as those future events don't already exist as certainties in a space-time. So it may be best just to leave all of the potential sensory data as potential pre-written future even though some of it is far more unlikely to be received than other parts.

Georgina Woodward

With the arrangement shown, it can be seen that the source of the present now is not a material future. The world is not revealed by moving along a world line through space-time, into new pre-existent spatial configurations. Without a geometric time dimension observers do not have world lines through space-time and are not 4 dimensional objects. A historical representation can be made that could show the path through the sequence of former configurations. However it is only a representation not a physical object, as only the youngest configuration exists.

kurt stocklmeir

I said gravity gets stronger as it travels there is not any dark matter. All forces get stronger as they travel. Because all forces get stronger as they travel second law of thermodynamics does not work.

Kurt Stocklmeir

kurt stocklmeir

for years I have talked about this - gravity gets stronger as it travels gravitons get more energy as they travel - because of this things fall at different speeds

Kurt Stocklmeir

Steve Dufourny

Dear FQXI,Zeeya,Mr Aguirre ,Mr Tegmark, please if you can like you live at New York and that Professor Neil Degrasse Tyson also.In fact my LinkedIn ishacked.I cannot even publish now,it is crazzy even.I was honored to be endorsed by him on linkedin and that the Professor Tyson liked my posts and works.I love so much his cosmos television and works.I am sorry but like my net was hacked I have deleted contacts.But In fact I am sorry because I respect him very much and now he thinks probably that no.It is just due to my net hacked.If you see him , please explain him my apologies.Best Regards

Friendly

Georgina Woodward

I have put a new collection of ideas about time on viXra. It can be found here Uni-Temporalism, the Relation of Human Beings to Time and the 'future' of Time in Physics A lot of the ideas have already been presented and discussed within the FQXi community pages. This writing is concentrating on the ideas about time I have presented and relevant issues, and gives some other ideas about time for comparison.

Any comments on that would be much appreciated either on the viXra page or here. If you find it interesting please share it.

sherman jenkins

"Uni-temporal" or "now time" fits for the great bulk of the so called empty universe (the vacuum) but does not fully cover distortions in the pace of change caused by mass and motion. And "Uni-temporal" does not show the origin of "now time"

Your paper has a good starting argument for the underlying structure of the Universe in the "Appendix: Evidence for another component of Object reality and member of the set representation:"

I posted in this Forum Category and Topic on Oct. 31, 2016 a very brief description of the origin of time and matter. Also my entry in the first FQXI contest describes the nature of mass, energy and time. We could call this variation from "Uni-temporal" time something like (here and there now time).

I hope to enter the present contest, "Wandering Towards a Goal," and tell how I achieved enlightenment re: time, matter and the goal. Time, energy and matter are all parts of one puzzle that can only be seen as the whole assembly of the Universe.

Georgina Woodward

Hi Sherman Loran,

Yes uni-temporal Now is the continually changing configuration of the material Object universe, not 'the whole story'. later on you will see there is also emergent time that is derived from received information. Mass causes alteration of the paths of light rays and hence EM information distribution, affecting receipt. Motion causes alteration of information received and hence the product.

I put the "Evidence for another component of Object reality and member of the set representation"in the appendix as it is not essential to the description of time.

I look forward to reading your essay.

Georgina Woodward

Hi Sherman Loran,

Did you read the difference between uni-temporal (-Now)time and Newtonian time? Uni-temporal-Now is not now. Uni-temporal Now (-Now) is the configuration of the Object universe, not an absolute time irrespective of the contents of space nor the experienced present. The present now is emergent from information processing.

« Previous Page Next Page »