John, As regards your comment:
"It is a quantity of energy and it is evident that when it passes through the slits, it is more of a field and in fact it seems possible the wave effects are due to this quantity passing through the slits, rather than integral to the light, just as the point effect is likely due to how it is absorbed by the mass of the detector. "
The solution to the double slit conundrum is as follows:
With respect to the double slit experiment, if the photon/electron, etc., being in its collapsed state (i.e. black hole-like) prior to departure from
its originating aperature, then proceeds to it becoming more spatial (MT=S in accordance with Coney Island Green), manifesting into amuch much larger three dimensional spatial state, could it then not go through both slits? For
instance, without the need for the current quantumn conundrum of splitting into two particles and having one particle go through both slits, like some sort of quantum magic? Current thought requires the particle to split and go through both slits, to be in two places at once, like magic. CIG theory allows some of the the particle, now in its spatial state, to go through one
slit, and some of the particle to go through the remaining slit. No magic necessary. Much more believable.
The introduction of MT=S allows for the particle to go through both slits without the need for quantumn confusion. Then, the spatial field faces interference and diffraction, according to normal wave theory. It collapses accordingly when it "hits the wall", adhering to probabilities
of wave function collapse (the probabilities may actually follow the 4th Law of Motion & the desire to reach time equilibrium). The collapse of the spatial field (S/T=M), reintroduces not the particle, but a new particle, only different from the first via its transmutations through its
field interractions during its journey from the originating aperature, through both slits, subsequent wave interference, and final collapse.
What started as a massive particle lost that mass and became spatial, and could then travel closer to the speed of light. Matter loses mass as it travels fatser and faster, it does not, as Einstein offers, gain mass.
The mass turns into Space ( the spacetime continuum). MTS combines E = mc2 and spacetime through a reinterpretation of time dilation as space creation.
Put a cold balloon in the refrigerator. Take it out and watch the space increase inside the balloon. Do we agree that there is new spatial volume inside the balloon? If yes, where did that space come from? MTS
If not, then we do not agree on our definitions.
CIG conserves energy. How is energy otherwise conserved in the expanding universe if CIG is not correct?
Were this an isolated solution to the double slit offered by the MTS equation/philosophy, it might be cause for doubt. However, MTS has now been applied to many other aspects of physics (my latest was quantum tunneling) and cosmology (dark matter, horizon problem, etc.).
And the sky I see at night is filled with Big Bangs.
And the atoms I can't see are Big Bangs.
I have been waiting for years and yearss for a comment on the validity of my theory.
I recognize some of its implications to physics. And what it displaces (i.e. inflationary theory).
I have offered about all can with my limited knowledge.
More syrup please.